Started By
Message
re: Would the SEC consider targeting Cincinnatti?
Posted on 12/13/12 at 6:56 pm to Cheese Grits
Posted on 12/13/12 at 6:56 pm to Cheese Grits
This post was edited on 2/17/13 at 6:03 pm
1
Posted on 12/13/12 at 6:58 pm to JDM1992
Not unless we approved it. Which we wouldn't.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 6:58 pm to Crompdaddy8
quote:
frick the expansion. I'm for exactly the opposite. we need to kick SC, Arky, atm, miz out and go back to 10 team conference. seriously
I loved the SEC at 10 teams. Very powerful core teams of my youth
Alabama
Auburn
Georgia
Florida
LSU
Kentucky
Tennessee
MSU
Ole Miss
Vandy
Posted on 12/13/12 at 6:59 pm to Gradual_Stroke
One school's major concerns don't mean anything. It wouldn't for any school unless it is the special category of schools trying to keep the state to themselves.
But aTm could do absolutely nothing
But aTm could do absolutely nothing
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:01 pm to Swoopin
Slive made an investment in A&M. If A&M thinks adding those parasites is bad for business, he will respect our request. Obviously, he isn't obligated to do as we say, but he is smart enough to know you don't go pissing off one of your biggest business partners.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:03 pm to Gradual_Stroke
This post was edited on 2/17/13 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:07 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
Slive made an investment in A&M. If A&M thinks adding those parasites is bad for business, he will respect our request. Obviously, he isn't obligated to do as we say, but he is smart enough to know you don't go pissing off one of your biggest business partners.
It's not ultimately Slive's decision... and no, we are not worried about what you think. What are you going to do? Leave? It's free and there's the door. There's a reason there isn't a buyout in the SEC...
You keep thinking this is a monarchy like the one you just left - where you were a peasant, yet now you think you are king. If the SEC decided that Oklahoma would be good for the SEC(it would), they would be added. Wouldn't make a damn bit of difference if A&M liked it or not.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:07 pm to JDM1992
I don't think you get how he thinks. It is based on $, not what some fat gump Uprez says.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:09 pm to engie
If we made enough noise (we would), they wouldn't want to destabilize the conference for 250,000 TV sets in Tulsa.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:10 pm to Gradual_Stroke
This post was edited on 2/17/13 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:11 pm to JDM1992
This post was edited on 2/17/13 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:12 pm to Gradual_Stroke
Destabilize? EL OH EL...I have heard it all now!
You can raise all the hell you want - What are you going to do about it? Exactly. You think the SEC is reliant on A&M? A&M is reliant on the SEC. Take your place at the table and shut up.
You can raise all the hell you want - What are you going to do about it? Exactly. You think the SEC is reliant on A&M? A&M is reliant on the SEC. Take your place at the table and shut up.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 7:14 pm
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:12 pm to Swoopin
I would hope not. What are the benefits for the SEC?
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:15 pm to JDM1992
quote:
Adding two Oklahoma schools adds far more subscribers than NC State and Virginia Tech.
That's the point. The SEC will not add two schools from the same state, it's the same market. That is why Va/Va Tech and NC State will be the next expansion targets. That would cover the entire southern US as SEC markets.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:16 pm to kywildcatfanone
This post was edited on 2/17/13 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:18 pm to Swoopin
Look in the stands during a Cinn. home game.....that'll give you the answer. 
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:20 pm to JDM1992
You're dumb if you believe that. The Carolina market and the Virgina market are huge and are exactly what the SEC is looking at. OK and OKSt? 
What?!
What?! Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:23 pm to Swoopin
No thanks. Most natural additions need to be Clemson and VT.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:25 pm to Swoopin
I'd rather grab Oklahoma City with OU,but I do like the FU to the buckeyes this would propose; however the SEC is already nationally broadcast. If I wanted an Ohio school, bring me tOSU.
Posted on 12/13/12 at 7:25 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
Most natural additions need to be Clemson and VT.
Clemson brings nothing the SEC doesn't already have with USC. A Va school and a NC school will be what's next for the SEC.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News