Started By
Message
re: Why is Auburn waiting until now
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:07 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:07 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Well Florida won't claim any because they have never had an undefeated season.
2
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:07 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
"What's wrong with doing exactly what Bama did?"
Except Bama didn't do that.
Except Bama didn't do that.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:08 pm to Whitey83
quote:
Well Florida won't claim any because they have never had an undefeated season.
Wrong (as usual).
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:09 pm to GoGators1995
Florida went 5-0-1 in 1911. That's it. Okay...but no perfect seasons
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:10 pm to Whitey83
Just making a factual correction. 
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:11 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
"What's wrong with doing exactly what Bama did?"
Can't find me asking that question here.
quote:
Except Bama didn't do that.
Rectoactively deciding to claim multiple championships at one time? Sure they did. You're the one that decided to apply the records book criteria to this, which I then accomodated and agreed on what should be recognized if that is the criteria we are going to use. I very much did answer.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:12 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Y'all make fun of Bama for claiming 1941 so you can't get mad when people make fun of y'all for claiming 1993. 
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:12 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
So what are you still arguing about then? You finally agreed that Bama didn't just make up claims like you're doing now. 
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:12 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
All titles before the AP are retro active. By every school. That means that Pitt is claiming way more retro active titles than Alabama.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:14 pm to GoGators1995
Is that what you think is happening here?
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:15 pm to Whitey83
quote:
That means that Pitt is claiming way more retro active titles than Alabama.
Probably
. I'm not as familiar with all of their claims and when they started making them? Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:15 pm to Whitey83
Pitt claims 9. 8 are retro active.
1915
1916
1918
1921
1929
1934
1936
1937
1976
So Auburn is tied with Pitt.
1915
1916
1918
1921
1929
1934
1936
1937
1976
So Auburn is tied with Pitt.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:15 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Well you keep responding..
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:16 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
that Bama didn't just make up claims
I never claimed they ever did that. You're just making up arguments and applying them to me for some reason. It is weird.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:16 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
You made a false statement and were factually corrected. If you're mad then that's not my fault.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:16 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
Well you keep responding..
Hi, welcome to a message board, where people respond when asked questions.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:16 pm to Whitey83
I take that back. 7 of Pitt's 9 are retro active.
1937 and 1976 are AP.
1937 and 1976 are AP.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:17 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
You made a false statement
I did not. You decided to apply your own standard to my statement that was not what my statement was in reference to.
This post was edited on 8/20/25 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:17 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Hi, welcome to a message board when making a false statement can be 100% factually corrected.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 4:17 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
"Just doing what Bama did." 100% false. If you're mad then direct your anger to the records book.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News