Started By
Message
re: Why did the SEC go after Texas when we already had aTm with a big market?
Posted on 9/1/22 at 3:24 pm to Sooner1984
Posted on 9/1/22 at 3:24 pm to Sooner1984
quote:
So the SEC has potentially 10 million new viewers by adding Texas and Oklahoma.
How are these “new” viewers?
Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:19 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
So when you're an A&M fan is that Alabama, Florida, Prairie View, Southern University or Texas A&M?
I'm never quite sure myself.
Then you are an idiot. Any time "A&M" is mentioned, they are always referring to Texas A&M. Every other school would be referred to in the following way:
Utah State
Prairie View
Alabama A&M
Florida A&M
Etc.
Try harder!!
Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:26 pm to transcend
quote:
Because the only team anyone outside of Texas knows about inside of Texas is Texas.
Are you ignorant or just stupid?

Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:29 pm to Hornish Kin
quote:
Didn’t you know? “We’re Texas—what starts here changes the world.” You improved yourselves merely by association with Texas. While that’s difficult to accept, we all know it’s just true.
Any more questions?
Get used to it, folks. They truly believe their own BS.

Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:35 pm to FLObserver
quote:
No offense to A&M and Mizz but if SEC had a choice between 2 teams to take back in 2012 of the four: OU/TX/A&M/MIZZ.
It would have been TX/OU 100%.
I don't recall that being the case in 1992 or when we actually made the jump.
If you were being honest, you'd say the tu add is simply about money, nothing more. Only the PAC12 and B1G would want their elitist, liberal/socialist asses.
Popular
Back to top
