Started By
Message
re: Why did LSU suck for 60 years prior to 2003?
Posted on 8/5/21 at 4:46 am to BarrySwitzerMFer
Posted on 8/5/21 at 4:46 am to BarrySwitzerMFer
quote:
Hurts was really soft in the arm skills/dissecting a defense areas.
Imagine how many nattys ou would have if they had qb's like Kyler Murray and Baker Mayfield.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 5:54 am to BarrySwitzerMFer
Because LSU didn’t have the luxury of playing in a shite conference like the Big 12
Posted on 8/5/21 at 6:55 am to BarrySwitzerMFer
Last year OU celebrated the 70th anniversary of the last time they beat LSU.
Congrats!

Congrats!


Posted on 8/5/21 at 7:22 am to BarrySwitzerMFer
quote:
Oklahoma Fan
quote:
Honestly, we never should’ve been there in the first place.
only correct thing you've said so far
Posted on 8/5/21 at 11:30 am to BarrySwitzerMFer
Why are you guys feeding the troll? He is clearly just trying to get a rise out of you.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 11:56 am to BarrySwitzerMFer
you're exactly right.
From 1958 to Nick Saban's arrival at LSU they were a mediocre also ran in the SEC that were 6th in the conference in winning pct.
Nick Saban built the program so well that LSU is still benefiting from it, but in due time that will wane. Orgeron had that one great year with Brady and Burrow and immediately followed it with the worst follow up year for a title team in my lifetime.
From 1958 to Nick Saban's arrival at LSU they were a mediocre also ran in the SEC that were 6th in the conference in winning pct.
Nick Saban built the program so well that LSU is still benefiting from it, but in due time that will wane. Orgeron had that one great year with Brady and Burrow and immediately followed it with the worst follow up year for a title team in my lifetime.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:01 pm to BLG
quote:
that were 6th in the conference in winning pct.
No they weren't. They were behind Alabama, Tennesse, and Georgia (still are). In SEC titles, they were also behind those three schools and tied with Florida for 4th. All the success they've had the past 20 years hasn't really changed their "ranking" in winning percentage or SEC titles. They've made up a lot of ground, sure, and passed other teams in national titles. Just like y'all like to say LSU has been only good since Saban, I'll say to you the 1990s wasn't what LSU was like the entire 30 years prior either.
This post was edited on 8/5/21 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:05 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
90s was mostly on the feet of Dinardo never putting it together on the field despite improving recruiting.
Curley Hallman
This post was edited on 8/5/21 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:09 pm to BarrySwitzerMFer
quote:
BarrySwitzerMFer
LSU has this guy big mad.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:12 pm to BarrySwitzerMFer
yes football was invented in the year 2000 in cajunland.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:22 pm to LSUTigersLJM
At least somebody here gets it. Even if it’s only one in a hundred
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:28 pm to lsufball19
quote:
that were 6th in the conference in winning pct.
No they weren't. They were behind Alabama, Tennesse, and Georgia (still are)
wrong answer. From 1958 to 2003 LSU was 6th in the conference in winning pct, behind
Alabama
Tennessee
Florida
Georgia
Auburn
click me click me click me
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:36 pm to BLG
I thought you meant all-time, not just in that arbitrary block of time. So they won 11 fewer games than Auburn and 14 fewer than UGA over a period of over 40 years? Going 25-41 from 1989-1994 didn't help. From 1959-1988, LSU had a higher winning % than Auburn, Florida, and Tennessee and had the same number of wins as Georgia (they had two more losses, one fewer tie, and played one more game). Alabama was the only SEC program firmly ahead of them.
LINK
Like I said, LSU's run from 1989-1999 isn't what they were the entire period of time from their natiuonal title in 1958 until 2000, but y'all sure do like to pretend they were
LINK
Like I said, LSU's run from 1989-1999 isn't what they were the entire period of time from their natiuonal title in 1958 until 2000, but y'all sure do like to pretend they were
This post was edited on 8/5/21 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:38 pm to BLG
quote:
From 1958 to Nick Saban's arrival at LSU they were a mediocre also ran in the SEC that were 6th in the conference in winning pct.
quote:
From 1958 to 2003 LSU was 6th in the conference in winning pct, behind
Saban got to LSU in 2000.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:43 pm to TigerLunatik
quote:
From 1958 to 2003 LSU was 6th in the conference in winning pct, behind
Saban got to LSU in 2000.
Oh ok.
The rank in the SEC doesn't improve (still 6th in the timeframe) but the winning pct and national rank aren't quite as good.
thanks for the correction
edit: oops. I was wrong. That does change the SEC team ranks. Now it puts LSU 7th in the SEC behind
Alabama
UT
UF
UGA
Auburn
Arkansas
LSU
Of course, Arkansas wasn't in the SEC for most of that time. At least OU and Tx aren't officially in the SEC yet, because that would put LSU 9th
Gee. I honestly never realized just how badly LSU struggled in this conference before Saban arrived there.
This post was edited on 8/5/21 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:48 pm to BLG
Don't really care about where LSU ranks 30-50 years ago to be honest. Figured you would want accurate numbers since you're so interested in it.
Posted on 8/5/21 at 12:51 pm to BLG
quote:
I honestly never realized just how badly LSU struggled in this conference before Saban arrived there.
I see you glossed over the fact that LSU was T2nd in wins in the SEC from 1959-1988? Because that certainly wouldn't tie into this narrative you're trying to spin. LSU was really really bad for 11 years right before Saban got there. That was not their entire history for 40 years
If you want to see by decade, here you go
1960s
Alabama
Ole Miss
LSU
Florida
Tennessee
Auburn
Georgia
1970s
Alabama
LSU
Tennessee
Auburn
Ole Miss
Florida
Georgia
1980s
Georgia
Auburn
Alabama
Tennessee
Florida
LSU
1990s
Florida
Tennessee
Alabama
Auburn
Georgia
Ole Miss
Arkansas
LSU
This post was edited on 8/5/21 at 1:01 pm
Popular
Back to top
