Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:16712
Registered on:12/8/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I just watched his soph highlights. The kid is listed at 190 but plays like he's 220. He runs through and over defenders. I'm curious to see how much more he develops the next couple years. No one is going to want to tackle this kid.
quote:

Dalen Powell

Ole miss and LSU both offered him on May 8. Class of 28'.
Composite #13 RB, #2 on 247
Has offers from other big programs like USC, FSU and Florida

re: LSU 8 @ UGA 11 Final

Posted by BayouCowboy on 5/8/26 at 6:27 pm to
Maybe our batters should use a golf club :lol:

re: LSU 8 @ UGA 11 Final

Posted by BayouCowboy on 5/8/26 at 6:25 pm to
Not a fan of the umps ankle high strike zone
quote:

Moscona’s locked on LSU said he’s likely committing to aTm soon.

Yesterday he didn't indicate that and Shea still says LSU (ie watch what they do). Corey's going full press so I still feel good about LSU
quote:

All Last Name Team....sheesh it's going to be difficult trying to pronounce their names.

LSU men's basketball will require closed captioning at a minimum. :lol:
quote:

Making the playoffs energized the boosters and it’s working out amazing right now

After this season, LSU will be the "hotness" of CFB.

Get on the Lane train or get left behind! :pimp:
quote:

Sauce wars I have my money on Shea

Hope so. Corey usually gets who he wants and he's been after Dobson for a while and it's not like we don't have money behind the offer.
quote:


#1 WR E. Royal
#3 WR B. Easter
#11 WR M. Whitley
#42 WR A. Stevens
#12 ATH B. Calais

Calais is supposed to be committing today and Speigs thinks he chooses LSU. Not sure what time though.
quote:

Playin chess, not checkers

Not just chess:
quote:

Motivated player trumps any strength coach or program

Dare I say he has the "want" to be great? :lol:
quote:

Pic looks like he’s in drivers seat. Epic that he drove back to dorm.

Looks to me like he's sitting behind the driver's seat
Despite all the new faces on the roster this is the most confident I've felt going into week 1 in a very long time.
quote:

Who is Roman Mothershed

New lead singer for Danzig. :lol:
quote:

"Iran stated in negotiations with U.S. envoy Witkoff "

see now guys like Occam are going to question whether this happened or not...... all in an attempt to prop up Kent because he said OMB.

Kind of hard to refute considering the Iranian spokesperson has been on every major network saying the same thing.

The only question is what defines "imminent"? OBL wasn't an imminent threat to mainland U.S. until he was and he just flew planes into buildings.
quote:


""The widespread assumption is that the material is still there. So we haven't seen - and not only us, I think in general all those observing the facility through satellite imagery and other means to see what's going on there - movement indicating that the material could have been transferred," Grossi ?said." -- Sounds like they really don't know one way or the other.

Then also it says, "All three Iranian uranium-enrichment plants known to have been operating - two at ?Natanz and one at Fordow - were destroyed or badly damaged in June." So what capabilities do they still have after the June attack?

Iran stated in negotiations with U.S. envoy Witkoff that they had 460kg of 60% enriched uranium, enough to make 11 nukes. To get to 90% enough for true weaponsm grade can be achieved in weeks . 3-5% enrichment is required for energy. Beyond 20% is approaching propulsion and 60% is "near weapons grade". The challenge is miniturization to put on a warhead and then delivery system with a survivable re-entry vehicle. That can take significantly longer. The question is, with their alliances with Russia and China and an already successful MRBM program, how long before they reach ICBM and MIRV capability?
quote:

I'm about a hour into the interview and it's pretty crazy people on here are completely ignoring the facts that Iran had no nuclear abilities or the ability to enrich nukes.

quote:

PARIS, March 9 (Reuters) - Almost half of ?Iran's uranium enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons-grade, was stored in a tunnel complex at Isfahan and is probably still there, U.N. nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said on Monday.
The tunnel complex is the only ?target that appears not to have been badly damaged in attacks last June by Israel ?and the U.S. on Iran's nuclear facilities.

The IAEA estimates ?that when Israel launched its first attacks in June, Iran had 440.9 kg of 60% uranium. If enriched further, that would provide the explosive needed for 10 nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick.
"What we believe is that Isfahan had ?until our last inspection a bit more than 200 kg, maybe a little bit more than that, ?of 60% uranium," IAEA chief Rafael Grossi told reporters in Paris.

You sure about that?
quote:

But, why is that America's responsibility? And how will we re-coop the money spent?

Invest now or "pay" later

Gonzaga up 6-1 on OU in 9th

Posted by BayouCowboy on 3/1/26 at 3:35 pm
2-7 Gonzaga is taking it to the same OU that was scoring 20 runs per game.

Maybe we should settle down bit with panicking about Jay's team
quote:

There is a literal act of congress that prohibits the US from selling F-22s to even our closest allies, and we all know that we're selling F-35s to basically everyone.

Those are export variants. The avionics are modified and some of the higher end technology is removed.

They are 2 totally different platforms. The F-35 is a multi-role platform. It can perform deep strike, SEAD (suppression of enemy defenses), escort, etc. It also has an AF, Marine and navy variant.

The F-22 is primarily a fighter.

It's not an either or discussion.