Started By
Message
re: Why did Auburn declare Cam Ineligible?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 6:40 pm to Buck Sweep
Posted on 12/1/10 at 6:40 pm to Buck Sweep
so they actually did find a rule violation, a rule violation serious enough to rule him ineligible, correct?
but the next day, the NCAA, SEC, and auburn agreed on what was true and what was false, it was determined he should not be ineligible, correct?
im not trying to flame, only figure out WTF is going on...this is quite peculiar
but the next day, the NCAA, SEC, and auburn agreed on what was true and what was false, it was determined he should not be ineligible, correct?
im not trying to flame, only figure out WTF is going on...this is quite peculiar
This post was edited on 12/1/10 at 6:41 pm
Posted on 12/1/10 at 6:43 pm to DBG
quote:
this is quite peculiar
+1
i've never heard/seen anything like it
something very weird is going on right now...
Posted on 12/1/10 at 6:44 pm to TheDoc
doc, it seems there had to be an understand of the rules of engagement prior to any eligible/ineligible talk...my question, why the frick did they rule anything? why not just remain silent and continue with the investigation?
Posted on 12/1/10 at 7:02 pm to Ross
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It shows that the two bodies were in full communication for weeks and just followed protocol
THERE'S NOTHING PROTOCOL ABOUT THIS PLAN OF ACTION..IT REALLY DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE...
It shows that the two bodies were in full communication for weeks and just followed protocol
THERE'S NOTHING PROTOCOL ABOUT THIS PLAN OF ACTION..IT REALLY DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE...
Posted on 12/1/10 at 7:09 pm to DBG
quote:
doc, it seems there had to be an understand of the rules of engagement prior to any eligible/ineligible talk...my question, why the frick did they rule anything? why not just remain silent and continue with the investigation?
FBI maybe?

Posted on 12/1/10 at 7:40 pm to smillerlsu
quote:I am really confused now. If the NCAA "concluded on Monday that a violation of amateurism rules occurred" why was the athlete re-instated after the university declared him ineligible. This makes no sense. Seriously, I am confused.
The NCAA concluded on Monday that a violation of amateurism rules occurred, therefore Auburn University declared the student-athlete ineligible yesterday for violations of NCAA amateurism rules.
Posted on 12/1/10 at 7:49 pm to tigerfan182
quote:
I am really confused now. If the NCAA "concluded on Monday that a violation of amateurism rules occurred" why was the athlete re-instated after the university declared him ineligible. This makes no sense. Seriously, I am confused.
Exactly
Posted on 12/1/10 at 7:53 pm to Schwaaz
quote:
quote:
Monday: NCAA informs Auburn that they have proof that Cam violated rules of amateurism. Tuesday: Auburn reacts by declaring Cam ineligible.
If true then he is ineligible the day of the violation and AU is 0-12 today.
Yea but now that he has been reinstated by the NCAA then the MNC / BCS game would count right?

Posted on 12/1/10 at 7:56 pm to TheDoc
quote:
Why did Auburn declare Cam Ineligible?
quote:
Does the NCAA not have a mandate that dictates it does things in the open? Does it stand to reason that the NCAA was obliged to release a statement as soon as AU determined scam not to be eligable, since it is the protocol of the NCAA that AU supposedly is satisfying. This is very back room, doors closed and double bolted...
Posted on 12/1/10 at 8:00 pm to StarkvilleTigerFan
quote:backdoor deal with the NCAA for instant reinstatement as long as they would allow the NCAA to start investigating.
I'm confused-why did Auburn decide to rule Cam ineligible yesterday?

Posted on 12/1/10 at 8:17 pm to tigerfan182
quote:So, the NCAA did not know this last Friday before the Iron Bowl? They developed this Monday?
The NCAA concluded on Monday that a violation of amateurism rules occurred, therefore Auburn University declared the student-athlete ineligible yesterday for violations of NCAA amateurism rules.
I.
Popular
Back to top
