re: Who has been the most dominant CFB Program since 2000

quote:

---

Except that doesn't include 2010, so it doesn't include all of last decade.

---

Still a pretty interesting take

Its obvious they put stock in different factors than the people in this thread have

He lists how he factors wins, conference championships, bowl wins, BCS bowl wins, top 25 finishes, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes and MNC into a formula

and this is what he comes out with (again this is 2000-2009 so not exactly the same time period we were talking about but close enough)

1.USC
2.Oklahoma
3.Texas
4.Ohio State
5.Florida
6.LSU
7.Georgia
8.Boise State
9.Miami
10.Virginia Tech
11.Oregon
12.Florida State
13.TCU
14.Auburn
15.West Virginia
16.Boston College
17.Utah
18.Alabama
19.Michigan
20.Wisconsin
21.Nebraska (tie with Iowa)
22.Iowa (tie with Nebraska)
23.Texas Tech
24.Oregon State
25.Tennessee

ETA: Sorry double post

quote:

---

LSU for splitting a title and backing into another with 2 losses.

---

If you would like to get technical.

LSU did not split. We won the BCS National Championship.

LSU did not back in. Our resume was better than anyone else.

quote:

---

pretty sure UGA had 2 losses that year as well

But they lost head to head to Tennessee, who had the same amount of conference losses, so they didn't get to go to the SEC CG

---

right...whats your point?

2000-2009 is close enough? you are losing 10-15 percent of the games, dude.

quote:

---

Hahahaha....LSU has the most wins, the best Poll data,, the most bowl wins, the most Crystal Trophies ......and the H2H over Florida, Auburn, Bama,OSU and Oklahoma..why is this still a discussion?

---

and yet they only ranked #6 in the poll from that article on most dominant program from 2000-2009... interesting

quote:

---

why is this still a discussion?

---

because Larry is still trying to flame....its just not working out for him

LSU had more wins over Oklahoma from 2000-2010?

The article was from Feb 2010. So USC would not be on the top.

At first, in this thread, your deciding factor was, "most dominant". Then you got owned with the facts and it went to "what ever you think is most dominant." Then you swithed to "most impressive" (ie. Auburn's undefeated seasons). Which btw is a terrible argument. Now your basing things on a list some guy put together almost two years ago.

GTFO man, youre a jackass and terrible at making any points.

quote:

---

But they lost head to head to Tennessee, who had the same amount of conference losses, so they didn't get to go to the SEC CG

---

I guess you are starting to catch on to how these things work.

quote:

---

LSU had more wins over Oklahoma from 2000-2010?

---

shhhhhh

dont try to present LSU fans with actual facts... just use only the data that makes them the winner and bow down to their greatness