Started By
Message
Which of these 2020 matchups is the safest win?
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:35 pm
Arkansas
Mizzou
Vanderbilt
I’m thinking Mizzou.
Things have been quiet and drama free at vandy in terms of opt outs and transfers.
Pittman still has a lot of work to do but Arkansas used to be dangerous under Bert, so there’s gotta be something salvageable there.
I think Mizzou barely has a team. I dont even know who their coach is.
Mizzou
Vanderbilt
I’m thinking Mizzou.
Things have been quiet and drama free at vandy in terms of opt outs and transfers.
Pittman still has a lot of work to do but Arkansas used to be dangerous under Bert, so there’s gotta be something salvageable there.
I think Mizzou barely has a team. I dont even know who their coach is.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:58 pm to PlateJohnsonIII
You'll get a reply shortly saying State will be the easiest win of 2020
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:00 pm to PlateJohnsonIII
Mizzou is the obvious answer but I’m going to go against the grain and pick Vandy.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:18 pm to TheCheshireHog
Vandy has four new quarterbacks this year, none of which were on the roster last year to be clear.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:21 pm to BobMayonnaise
So you’re thinking Mizzou since Vandy clearly got a talent influx with those four new guys?
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:24 pm to TheCheshireHog
I think that is exactly what he is saying... RIght?
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:59 pm to BobMayonnaise
vandy offense will be historically bad.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:20 pm to TheCheshireHog
I’m saying Vandy will be worse than usual.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:21 pm to BobMayonnaise
But still better than Mizzou?
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:23 pm to PlateJohnsonIII
quote:
Arkansas
Mizzou
Vanderbilt
I’m thinking Mizzou.
Things have been quiet and drama free at vandy in terms of opt outs and transfers.
Pittman still has a lot of work to do but Arkansas used to be dangerous under Bert, so there’s gotta be something salvageable there.
I think Mizzou barely has a team. I dont even know who their coach is.
Arkansas is your best bet! Mizzou is your worst bet!
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:23 pm to PlateJohnsonIII
I'd be pretty shocked if Vandy won a game this year to be honest. They seem next level bad.
Arkansas is horrible too though. So do not count them out on having an absurdly bad season either.
Arkansas is horrible too though. So do not count them out on having an absurdly bad season either.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:23 pm to PlateJohnsonIII
Arkansas, easily. First year HC (not just at Ark, but ever) and their roster was so depleted of talent that no amount of money could convince Lane to go there.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:36 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
But still better than Mizzou?
Pssst...it’s a troll
OP is a weird guy
He’s still got some “they ain’t southern, I don’t like Yankees” in him but he’s a literal pinko commie homosexual
Posted on 9/2/20 at 11:39 pm to Grateful Reb
I disagree. It’s Vandy by far.
Everyone in this conference underestimates Mizzou every year.
I’m not betting against Arkansas in some games, because of Felipe Franks. Sure he wasn’t great at UF, but he was decent, and has a lot of experience. Sounds like a perfect Transfer QB to an Arkansas team who has been lacking the past couple years.
Vandy should lose every game this year, except maybe vs UGA.
Everyone in this conference underestimates Mizzou every year.
I’m not betting against Arkansas in some games, because of Felipe Franks. Sure he wasn’t great at UF, but he was decent, and has a lot of experience. Sounds like a perfect Transfer QB to an Arkansas team who has been lacking the past couple years.
Vandy should lose every game this year, except maybe vs UGA.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 10:29 am to JohnnyRebel
quote:
I disagree. It’s Vandy by far.
Everyone in this conference underestimates Mizzou every year.
I’m not betting against Arkansas in some games, because of Felipe Franks. Sure he wasn’t great at UF, but he was decent, and has a lot of experience. Sounds like a perfect Transfer QB to an Arkansas team who has been lacking the past couple years.
Vandy should lose every game this year, except maybe vs UGA.
Actually a lot of folks OVERestimated Mizzou last year; but I get your point. In fact I'd rather be underestimated going into the season, not that it really has any effect on opponents. SEC coaching staffs are way too sophisticated for that. I expect us to get soundly beaten in our opener, but do you think Saban's message is going to be "take it easy in practice this week baws, Mizzou is a cupcake."
As you can see I don't post a lot but I probably spend more time here than I should and I always get a kick out of the variety of posters. Probably the majority just want to troll and dish shite, which admittedly can be kinda funny, but then someone will weigh in with a sober well-reasoned analysis like the above (UGA dig aside) and so you get the other side too separating the football men from the boys.
It would be interesting if people had to place monetary bets on that which they are trolling. But where would the fun in that be?
This post was edited on 9/3/20 at 10:34 am
Posted on 9/3/20 at 11:29 am to JesusQuintana
quote:
Pssst...it’s a troll
It’s a question, not a troll.
I gave my opinion and welcomed all SEC (read: not Clemson, Oklahoma, or Texas) fans to disagree.
If you disagree, just disagree and I will be happy to listen.
Posted on 9/3/20 at 12:59 pm to PlateJohnsonIII
quote:
I think Mizzou barely has a team. I dont even know who their coach is.
Harry Potter, duh.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News