Started By
Message
re: Which football program will be better the next 25 years: Texas A&M or Arkansas?
Posted on 12/28/12 at 11:54 pm to bdelarosa7
Posted on 12/28/12 at 11:54 pm to bdelarosa7
Gladius Veritas:
Thanks for just validating everything I've posted. You can try to mock and belittle the facts but that doesn't change anything.
Here are the facts:
Thanks for just validating everything I've posted. You can try to mock and belittle the facts but that doesn't change anything.
Here are the facts:
quote:
More wins, conference championships, national championships, bowl wins, heismans, money, facilities, educational prowess, size, etc, etc...
3
.png)
Posted on 12/28/12 at 11:56 pm to bdelarosa7
this thread has turned into Groundhog Day
Posted on 12/28/12 at 11:56 pm to Gladius Veritas
quote:
Yes, in the context of who is the better program, the overall record is the best measuring tool
KSU has an all-time winning record against Texas.
Posted on 12/28/12 at 11:57 pm to bdelarosa7
But seriously,
Posted on 12/28/12 at 11:57 pm to bdelarosa7
Want another fact?
41-25
41-25
Posted on 12/28/12 at 11:57 pm to bdelarosa7
Why do you keep replying to yourself? 
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:00 am to DWag215
quote:
KSU has an all-time winning record against Texas.
They've also played them 13 times
Bit of a difference between 13 and 66
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:00 am to Gladius Veritas
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:03 am to Gladius Veritas
So all time head-to-head record is the most reliable indicator of the better program except when it's not.
Got it.
Got it.
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:03 am to DWag215
quote:
KSU has an all-time winning record against Texas.
U sound jelly.
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:06 am to DWag215
quote:
So all time head-to-head record is the most reliable indicator of the better program except when it's not.
Got it.
Just saying after 66 games if you were the better program it would show on the field
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:08 am to DWag215
quote:
So all time head-to-head record is the most reliable indicator of the better program except when it's not. Got it.
More of the reason why arky fans make me
Let me emphasize again:
Oh hell - you know I'm just going to quote a large number of facts lending themselves to another fact that A&M > Arky
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:10 am to Gladius Veritas
quote:
Just saying after 66 games if you were the better program it would show on the field
Oh, but it does:
quote:
More wins, conference championships, national championships, bowl wins, heismans, money, facilities, educational prowess, size, etc, etc...
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:10 am to Gladius Veritas
quote:
Just saying after 66 games if you were the better program it would show on the field
Sure, and my arbitrary standard says 13 is the lucky number -- especially when the brunt of those games occurred in a relatively recent window.
I mean, Texas's total wins, conference championships, MNCs, Heismans, etc. definitely don't carry weight in the analysis.
This post was edited on 12/29/12 at 12:11 am
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:17 am to DWag215
13 isn't enough games to determine that
66 is
Pretty simple
66 is
Pretty simple
This post was edited on 12/29/12 at 12:20 am
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:19 am to Gladius Veritas
quote:
13 isn't enough games to determine that 66 is
Link?
Arbitrary is arbitrary.
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:20 am to bdelarosa7
It's common sense
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:20 am to Gladius Veritas
perfectly common
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:21 am to bdelarosa7
What about 17? UT owns Arky 13-4.
Given that fact, that trend will continue in the next 25 years.
Given that fact, that trend will continue in the next 25 years.
Posted on 12/29/12 at 12:22 am to bdelarosa7
A&M relegated to living vicariously through other teams
Well I'll be. Color me shocked
Well I'll be. Color me shocked
Page 27 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News