Started By
Message
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:49 am to TTsTowel
Just ignore his arse. He's nonexistent to me.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:49 am to diddydirtyAubie
Do you have a screen shot? Some proof? Do you really expect me to take your word on such a matter?
The post has been edited and who knows what was changed after the agreeing parties entered into terms on said bet.
The post has been edited and who knows what was changed after the agreeing parties entered into terms on said bet.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:50 am to diddydirtyAubie
Dang. That was most of the good pigs. The bad ones didn't bite. 
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:51 am to Hawgeye
quote:
Do you have a screen shot? Some proof? Do you really expect me to take your word on such a matter?
The post has been edited and who knows what was changed after the agreeing parties entered into terms on said bet.
The shite has been there the whole time. Nobody in either party complained since they knew it was there from the beginning.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:53 am to roadGator
There's about 100 active Hog fans, we lost 12. Well, 11 since SH isn't going to honor the bet. Plenty of us still around.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:53 am to diddydirtyAubie
Actually, yes, my clients were complaining.
So, I'd suggest you supply some proof of an original post before an edit. Thus, the bet may be waived all together.
So, I'd suggest you supply some proof of an original post before an edit. Thus, the bet may be waived all together.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:53 am to Hawgeye
quote:
Link to thread with no edit in OP?
What would that have to do with anything? If the edits were made way before the game and no one that agreed to the bet made any protest to the edits made.
eta: Edits were made for clarification based on questions from those entering the bet. They chose to accept the bet anyways. Go find some new clients.
This post was edited on 8/31/14 at 9:55 am
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:55 am to Hawgeye
You do know that a thread had to be edited to add posters in said bet, right?
I mean, come the frick on, this is pathetic.
I mean, come the frick on, this is pathetic.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:56 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
So, basically you have no proof of the original post in which terms were agreed upon?
It's quite clear an edit was made...
It's quite clear an edit was made...
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:57 am to TTsTowel
Nothing about their reneged bets should surprise you.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:57 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
His "clients" had over 4 months to complain. They didn't complain, because nothing was changed.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:57 am to TTsTowel
The only thing I would suggest would be to produce a screen shot of original bet.
If not, then it looks like admin's may have to wave this bet all together.
If not, then it looks like admin's may have to wave this bet all together.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:58 am to diddydirtyAubie
Oh, they've been complaining.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:58 am to Hawgeye
quote:
If not, then it looks like admin's may have to wave this bet all together.
The admins have nothing to do with this bet. It's an honor system.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 9:59 am to Hawgeye
quote:
Oh, they've been complaining.
Where were they from April until August? STFU
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:01 am to diddydirtyAubie
Hard to "honor" anything that is clearly shown to be edited.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:02 am to Hawgeye
Yeah it was edited. I know for a fact my name was added on the AU side after I said I was in.
So, yes modifications were made. Anybody who was on that list and intended to be on it knows who they are. This is a sportsmans bet. Either man up if you were in or be a pussy.
So, yes modifications were made. Anybody who was on that list and intended to be on it knows who they are. This is a sportsmans bet. Either man up if you were in or be a pussy.
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:03 am to Hawgeye
I wasn't in favor of a ban on them in the first place but hawgeye you are looking horrible right now.
Popular
Back to top


1








