Started By
Message
re: When Does The Alabama Dynasty End?
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:15 pm to TeLeFaWx
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:15 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I'm just saying the system didn't deliver equal opportunity and is stupid, and didn't determine a true champion. The BCS title is yours. But imo, a National Champion was never determined.
Just...wow.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:16 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I know you did. I'm just saying the system wasn't fair. Does that mean I think LSU should be handed the crystal football? No. I'm just saying the system didn't deliver equal opportunity and is stupid, and didn't determine a true champion. The BCS title is yours. But imo, a National Champion was never determined.
But you could say that every year, couldn't you? I mean how do we know USC was better than AU in 2004? How do we know LSU was better than some of the other 2-loss teams in 2007? How do we know Utah wasn't the best team in 2008? Even with a 4 team playoff....how do you know #5 wasn't really the best team? Until we have a 64 team playoff in football can you really know who the true champ is, according to your idealistic standard?
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:18 pm to bamascott2
quote:
Being short, fat, and a soccer player doesn't help, either
we may be short....but we aint fat.
it's from all that running....
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:19 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
but just because you're the best team doesn't mean you deserve to be in the title game
Wow. I rest my case, your honor.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:20 pm to Bobby Moore
quote:
dynasty.......
21-0
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:21 pm to tider04
Utah...........
, McCarron's tattoo......
, Ul-Monroe......
I can do this too, let's move on
This post was edited on 7/7/12 at 10:23 pm
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:22 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
I am no way affiliated with anything from Arkansas.. I just hate LSU.. That is all.
I would hate LSU too if I was an Auburn fan. If A JJ/ JL qb combo went 3-1 against us, I'd hate that school too. By a total score of 116 to 65. You're beneath us. HISTORICALLY AND PRESENT. DWI
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:22 pm to tider04
I don't, but I will say that this is the only year that I can say that the method of winning the BCS could have swayed people's minds on who deserved the National Championship. The BCS should be whoever wins is the National Champ, but could any team in the history of the BCS champ game have lost the game fair and square, but the fashion in which the win came in to effect? If LSU had lost to Bama in January by a score of 9-6, and missed 7 field goals in the process... Who would deserve the championship? The AP would have named LSU. No doubt. If the system allows for the fashion in which the game occurred to determine the champion, then it doesn't actually determine the champion. It isn't a game of who can lose by a small margin and miss the most field goals in the process. It is just about winning, and LSU already proved they could beat Alabama. Am I saying Alabama didn't win the BCS? No. They are BCS Champs. That doesn't make them National Champs.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:22 pm to tider04
quote:
flamefest rerun
It's like a CD on autoloop.
This post was edited on 7/7/12 at 10:27 pm
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:23 pm to bamascott2
Yes 5'10 is really short. And I'm not nor ever been fat. I'm superior to you, boy.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:23 pm to bamascott2
quote:
JJ...
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:24 pm to tider04
No I think the BCS was able to reasonably determine the National Champs in a lot of years. In those years, the manner in which a team won the BCS game never would have mattered. I just explained how it would have in January.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:25 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Yes 5'10 is really short. And I'm not nor ever been fat. I'm superior to you, boy.
Check the sig. You're my hero.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:25 pm to Grievous Angel
quote:
So you're saying OSU had the better resume. Methinks you would have rather played OSU, because you know they would have been easier to beat.
I'm saying OSU had a better resume, because they did. THESE ARE FACTS YOU DUMBASSES. NOT OPINIONS. CAMT BE ARGUED.
BAMA - 2 ranked teams 3 with above .500
OSU- 5 ranked teams 6 above .500
These are pre blow ranking because that's te resume used to vote in teams.
ONCE AGAIN, THESE ARE FACTS.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:26 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
It did when OU/tu/Texas Tech tied for the Big 12 South. Texas Tech was viewed as the weaker team, and tu the missed out, even though they beat the team that won the division with the same record. So... You're wrong.
No I'm not. Tex lost out because a weaker SOS. I'm not wrong.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:27 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Ricky, you're drunk again. Go to bed.
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:27 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I don't, but I will say that this is the only year that I can say that the method of winning the BCS could have swayed people's minds on who deserved the National Championship. The BCS should be whoever wins is the National Champ, but could any team in the history of the BCS champ game have lost the game fair and square, but the fashion in which the win came in to effect? If LSU had lost to Bama in January by a score of 9-6, and missed 7 field goals in the process... Who would deserve the championship? The AP would have named LSU. No doubt. If the system allows for the fashion in which the game occurred to determine the champion, then it doesn't actually determine the champion. It isn't a game of who can lose by a small margin and miss the most field goals in the process. It is just about winning, and LSU already proved they could beat Alabama. Am I saying Alabama didn't win the BCS? No. They are BCS Champs. That doesn't make them National Champs.
So by your logic, if TAMU wins the West in a few years and UF wins the East, but UF already beat TAMU in the regualr season, the SECCG should just be canceled? I'm guessing your view of the value of rematches would change in a heartbeat
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:28 pm to Hoyt
Ask Florida what happened after they broke the coaches trophy, bamas run at a dynasty is over.
Popular
Back to top


0





