Started By
Message

re: When Does The Alabama Dynasty End?

Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:15 pm to
Posted by bamascott2
XIV
Member since Apr 2009
9671 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

I'm just saying the system didn't deliver equal opportunity and is stupid, and didn't determine a true champion. The BCS title is yours. But imo, a National Champion was never determined.

Just...wow.
Posted by tider04
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2007
5606 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

I know you did. I'm just saying the system wasn't fair. Does that mean I think LSU should be handed the crystal football? No. I'm just saying the system didn't deliver equal opportunity and is stupid, and didn't determine a true champion. The BCS title is yours. But imo, a National Champion was never determined.

But you could say that every year, couldn't you? I mean how do we know USC was better than AU in 2004? How do we know LSU was better than some of the other 2-loss teams in 2007? How do we know Utah wasn't the best team in 2008? Even with a 4 team playoff....how do you know #5 wasn't really the best team? Until we have a 64 team playoff in football can you really know who the true champ is, according to your idealistic standard?
Posted by VanBasten9
Land of The White Elephants
Member since May 2012
1384 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

Being short, fat, and a soccer player doesn't help, either


we may be short....but we aint fat.
it's from all that running....
Posted by tider04
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2007
5606 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

but just because you're the best team doesn't mean you deserve to be in the title game

Wow. I rest my case, your honor.
Posted by Bobby Moore
Red Hill, Mississippi
Member since Jun 2005
17751 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:20 pm to
dynasty.......
Posted by tider04
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2007
5606 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

dynasty.......

21-0
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
58754 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:21 pm to
Utah........... , McCarron's tattoo...... , Ul-Monroe...... I can do this too, let's move on
This post was edited on 7/7/12 at 10:23 pm
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48098 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

I am no way affiliated with anything from Arkansas.. I just hate LSU.. That is all.

I would hate LSU too if I was an Auburn fan. If A JJ/ JL qb combo went 3-1 against us, I'd hate that school too. By a total score of 116 to 65. You're beneath us. HISTORICALLY AND PRESENT. DWI
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29311 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:22 pm to
I don't, but I will say that this is the only year that I can say that the method of winning the BCS could have swayed people's minds on who deserved the National Championship. The BCS should be whoever wins is the National Champ, but could any team in the history of the BCS champ game have lost the game fair and square, but the fashion in which the win came in to effect? If LSU had lost to Bama in January by a score of 9-6, and missed 7 field goals in the process... Who would deserve the championship? The AP would have named LSU. No doubt. If the system allows for the fashion in which the game occurred to determine the champion, then it doesn't actually determine the champion. It isn't a game of who can lose by a small margin and miss the most field goals in the process. It is just about winning, and LSU already proved they could beat Alabama. Am I saying Alabama didn't win the BCS? No. They are BCS Champs. That doesn't make them National Champs.
Posted by bamascott2
XIV
Member since Apr 2009
9671 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:22 pm to
JJ...
Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

flamefest rerun





It's like a CD on autoloop.
This post was edited on 7/7/12 at 10:27 pm
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48098 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:23 pm to
Yes 5'10 is really short. And I'm not nor ever been fat. I'm superior to you, boy.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
58754 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

JJ...



, thank god he's gone
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29311 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:24 pm to
No I think the BCS was able to reasonably determine the National Champs in a lot of years. In those years, the manner in which a team won the BCS game never would have mattered. I just explained how it would have in January.
Posted by bamascott2
XIV
Member since Apr 2009
9671 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

Yes 5'10 is really short. And I'm not nor ever been fat. I'm superior to you, boy.

Check the sig. You're my hero.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48098 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

So you're saying OSU had the better resume. Methinks you would have rather played OSU, because you know they would have been easier to beat.


I'm saying OSU had a better resume, because they did. THESE ARE FACTS YOU DUMBASSES. NOT OPINIONS. CAMT BE ARGUED.
BAMA - 2 ranked teams 3 with above .500
OSU- 5 ranked teams 6 above .500

These are pre blow ranking because that's te resume used to vote in teams.
ONCE AGAIN, THESE ARE FACTS.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48098 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

It did when OU/tu/Texas Tech tied for the Big 12 South. Texas Tech was viewed as the weaker team, and tu the missed out, even though they beat the team that won the division with the same record. So... You're wrong.


No I'm not. Tex lost out because a weaker SOS. I'm not wrong.
Posted by bamascott2
XIV
Member since Apr 2009
9671 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:27 pm to
Ricky, you're drunk again. Go to bed.
Posted by tider04
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2007
5606 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

I don't, but I will say that this is the only year that I can say that the method of winning the BCS could have swayed people's minds on who deserved the National Championship. The BCS should be whoever wins is the National Champ, but could any team in the history of the BCS champ game have lost the game fair and square, but the fashion in which the win came in to effect? If LSU had lost to Bama in January by a score of 9-6, and missed 7 field goals in the process... Who would deserve the championship? The AP would have named LSU. No doubt. If the system allows for the fashion in which the game occurred to determine the champion, then it doesn't actually determine the champion. It isn't a game of who can lose by a small margin and miss the most field goals in the process. It is just about winning, and LSU already proved they could beat Alabama. Am I saying Alabama didn't win the BCS? No. They are BCS Champs. That doesn't make them National Champs.

So by your logic, if TAMU wins the West in a few years and UF wins the East, but UF already beat TAMU in the regualr season, the SECCG should just be canceled? I'm guessing your view of the value of rematches would change in a heartbeat
Posted by polarbehr
behind gump lines
Member since Sep 2011
6568 posts
Posted on 7/7/12 at 10:28 pm to
Ask Florida what happened after they broke the coaches trophy, bamas run at a dynasty is over.
Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15 16 17 ... 30
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 30Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter