Started By
Message
re: What games would have Les lost
Posted on 11/4/16 at 9:48 am to bamasgot13
Posted on 11/4/16 at 9:48 am to bamasgot13
quote:
They'll say the offense wouldn't have been as dynamic and that the games would've been closer with Les, though.
Would that be wrong?
0
Posted on 11/4/16 at 9:50 am to Jim Croce
quote:
hey would have beaten Wisconsin
I don't think so. Wisconsin D would have feasted on Etling passes. Wisconsin would have won by around 17.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 9:50 am to ASW2015
Les would have won all but maybe Ole Miss.
Les would not have set three all-time LSU offensive records in the three games.
Les would not have outscored the opponents 73-7 in the second half.
Les' offense did not like being on the field for more than three plays at a time, so LSU probably would have given up a lot more than the 38 points LSU has given up without him.
Les would not have set three all-time LSU offensive records in the three games.
Les would not have outscored the opponents 73-7 in the second half.
Les' offense did not like being on the field for more than three plays at a time, so LSU probably would have given up a lot more than the 38 points LSU has given up without him.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 9:52 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Do you think Mississippi is better than Jacksonville State?
I think Mississippi is playing uninspired football now. Jacksonville State has only lost to you guys. So I think OM is more talented, but not executing as well.
But I do think LSU is playing inspired and believing in themselves again. I'm hoping Bama can stop that and have them cussing each other out on the sidelines by halftime.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 9:53 am to Tridentds
quote:
Same record. Record would have been the same if Orgeron started off the year as HC. LSU still loses to Wisconsin and Auburn.
bullshite. Maybe Auburn but we absolutely beat Wisconsin with O and Ensminger & Etling. I don't think anyone but LSU fans realize how bad the play calling was with Cam and Harris.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 9:54 am to Tridentds
So by putting in a qb that can actually complete a short/mid range pass, LSU loses by 15 more points?
Poor troll attempt
Poor troll attempt
Posted on 11/4/16 at 9:56 am to Bayou_Tiger_225
LSU 10 points vs Southern Miss in first half at home.
Not sure if you guys think this is awesome or what? You guys are almost delusional about your offense being unstoppable. Seriously.
Not sure if you guys think this is awesome or what? You guys are almost delusional about your offense being unstoppable. Seriously.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 9:58 am to Tridentds
Poor attempt not sure why I took your comment seriously
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:00 am to Tridentds
quote:
LSU 10 points vs Southern Miss in first half at home.
Not sure if you guys think this is awesome or what? You guys are almost delusional about your offense being unstoppable. Seriously.
Nobody said it's unstoppable. Etling would've absolutely been able to get their LBs off the LOS. The OL handled their DL really well that game.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:00 am to Jim Croce
Of course they don't lose by 17 but they don't beat Wisconsin with or without Orgeron. That's my opinion.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:02 am to MightyYat
I think you forget the dumpster fire Auburn was when yall played them. They are not the Auburn of today. I actually think you beat Auburn with coach O but still lose to Wisconsin.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:04 am to MightyYat
quote:
I don't think anyone but LSU fans realize how bad the play calling was with Cam and Harris.
Oh I'm positive the entire country knew how bad the play calling was with Les and Cam
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:04 am to Tridentds
quote:
Of course they don't lose by 17 but they don't beat Wisconsin with or without Orgeron. That's my opinion.
LSU lost by 2pts with Harris throwing 2 ints. Etling 100% doesn't make that last int.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:08 am to Tridentds
Did anyone say our offense was unstoppable???
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:09 am to doogles19
quote:
Did anyone say our offense was unstoppable???
No one is used to seeing LSU competent on offense. Can't blame them really.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:11 am to doogles19
You guys are rattled and borderline hysterical...
Going to be kind of sad around here on Saturday night.
Going to be kind of sad around here on Saturday night.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:11 am to Tridentds
quote:
Of course they don't lose by 17 but they don't beat Wisconsin with or without Orgeron. That's my opinion.
good thing your opinion means nothing. They were in field goal range with Les and Harris. Now, a team that is playing much better, would lose by 17? As far as Auburn, they were literally less than a second away from winning that game. This is unbelievably stupid even for an aggie
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:12 am to Tridentds
quote:
You guys are rattled and borderline hysterical...
Going to be kind of sad around here on Saturday night.
Just because you're getting called out on your trolling? C'mon now.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:13 am to bamasgot13
quote:
None. They'll say the offense wouldn't have been as dynamic and that the games would've been closer with Les, though.
You must watch a lot of LSU football.
Posted on 11/4/16 at 10:14 am to RT1941
OM would have likely been a close game that could've gone either way at the end. Missouri game would've been a lot closer also. I don't know that the record would've been different but if not for Miles we would likely be 6-1 or 7-0
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News