Started By
Message
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:04 pm to TigerMeister
quote:
LSU isn't anything special yet we have the most national championships in all sports in the SEC
Umm, No you don't
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:06 pm to Hawgeye
My original post pertains to football, mens basketball, and baseball. I'm not keeping track of women's gymnastics championships. So if UT or anyone else has championships in those kinds of sports then I'm sorry for the slight.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:07 pm to Me
Then why would you say "All Sports" if you did not mean it?
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:08 pm to Me
quote:
You guys may want to actually win something sometime
Hmmm, lets compare:
Tennessee: National Champs 1938,1940,1950,1951,1967,1998
LSU: National Champs
1958,2003,2007
Most SEC titles:
1-Alabama
2-Tennessee
3-Georgia
4-LSU
Not winning sure has been good to us, or do you want to keep doing this?
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:15 pm to Tnman
quote:
Not winning sure has been good to us, or do you want to keep doing this?
Nope, I'm pretty content with my stance. Tenn has been riding on an overrated reputation since the 1970's. Besides, I said BCS championships, all that 1930s bullcrap is irrelavant.
I find it embarassing that this great program has never been to the final four, won a baseball championship (is this even correct no one rebutted?) and 1 BCS championship. The only thing they have is following Peyton Manning in the pros and he couldn't even bring a heisman or championship to the school. But he is a pefect example of the overrated comment I originally made.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:17 pm to Tnman
Do you mean "you're" fricking idiot?
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:17 pm to adammwilson
quote:
1990
What fricking title are you talking about?
Colorado and Georgia Tech split the title that year.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:18 pm to Lee County Tiger
He meant UGA in baseball. Some moron from UT said that they had never won in baseball. I'm noticing that they aren't very good with facts.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:20 pm to Me
quote:
He meant UGA in baseball. Some moron from UT said that they had never won in baseball. I'm noticing that they aren't very good with facts.
Ah. Good for them.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:21 pm to Lee County Tiger
quote:
When you really stop and think about it this school has done nothing in its sports history
History? 1930's is part of history isn't it?
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:21 pm to Tnman
quote:
1930's is part of history isn't it?
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:22 pm to Tnman
quote:
Top ten winningest college football programs:
1. Michigan: 877-304-38
2. Texas: 845-321-34
3. Notre Dame: 837-291-42
4. Nebraska: 837-341-41
5. Ohio State: 819-308-53
6. Alabama: 813-316-43
7. Penn State 812-351-43
8. Oklahoma: 796-305-53
9. Tennessee: 783-333-55
10. USC: 774-307-54
Hmmm, where's LSU
You know damn well where LSU is...only 3 behind Tennessee..
13. Louisiana St. 710 387 47
Couldn't find the up to date list from NCAA site but through 2007 what they had listed here is the NCAA Top Ten Schools With National Championships (not including football)
Where's Tennessee?
UCLA: 100
Stanford: 94
Southern California: 84
Oklahoma State: 48
Arkansas: 43
LSU: 40
Texas: 39
Michigan: 32
North Carolina: 32
Penn State: 32
Posted on 3/28/10 at 5:28 pm to Tnman
quote:
Hmmm, lets compare:
Tennessee: National Champs 1938,1940,1950,1951,1967,1998
LSU: National Champs
1958,2003,2007
The only year you have there with the AP and/or UPI and the BCS is 1951 and 1998...if you are going to count all of UT's then throw all of LSU's in there as well...
1908, 1935, 1936, 1958, 1959, 1962, 2003, 2007
Posted on 3/28/10 at 8:46 pm to Tnman
quote:
1938
quote:
1940
quote:
1950
quote:
1967
Posted on 3/28/10 at 8:48 pm to Draconian Sanctions
FWIW, Historically Tennessee has a slightly better football program than LSU and a badass Women's Basketball program.
LSU is significantly stronger than Tennessee in every other sport.
LSU is significantly stronger than Tennessee in every other sport.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 8:57 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Let's not forget that LSU backed into the '03 title game. If the Pac 10 had been part of the BCS USC would have been in the title game. USC won the AP title that year and would've likely claimed the Coaches' Poll had the coaches not been obligated to vote for the winner of the BCS title game.
Posted on 3/28/10 at 9:02 pm to powerT
quote:
Let's not forget that LSU backed into the '03 title game. If the Pac 10 had been part of the BCS USC would have been in the title game. USC won the AP title that year and would've likely claimed the Coaches' Poll had the coaches not been obligated to vote for the winner of the BCS title game.
1st post=lols
Posted on 3/28/10 at 9:22 pm to Deactived
And yet LSU was still closer than Tenn to having any claim to any title in 2003. Fact.
Popular
Back to top


0





