Started By
Message
re: Tobias Singleton supposedly charged with assault
Posted on 1/25/11 at 12:55 pm to DCRebel
Posted on 1/25/11 at 12:55 pm to DCRebel
quote:
But what you're totally discounting is that her face could be totally fine. If she calls the cops and says "he assaulted me" he's gonna get arrested.
Not quite what she stated. Her description is a little more violent
quote:
The girlfriend “advised us that she and Mr. Manning were sitting in his car when Mr. Manning started striking her in the face,” reads the police report. “She exited the vehicle and got a tire jack. She states that Mr. Manning took it and threw her on the ground and started punching her in the back. (Redacted) advises that (redacted), the father of Tobias Manning, and his brothers, started kicking the blue Impala, causing damage to the driver and backside of the vehicle.”
Striking was the word used.. that means more than one hit.
Threw her to the ground...
Punching her.. That is again more than one punch.
Somewhere on that girl is a sign that this took place.....
1
Posted on 1/25/11 at 12:57 pm to DCRebel
quote:
ou're only treating it like a foregone conclusion because you're butthurt the guy didn't commit to State.
Same thing Auburn people states.. Not so DC. I have zero tolerance for that. None. Again.. with what she described there would be some sort of evidence! PERIOD!
This post was edited on 1/25/11 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:06 pm to Itsme2011
Well the WHOLE story isn't out there. Yes, she described something. But that could be totally fabricated. That happens a lot in these types of situations. Can't throw stones at the kid just yet.
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:10 pm to DCRebel
quote:
But what you're totally discounting is that her face could be totally fine. If she calls the cops and says "he assaulted me" he's gonna get arrested
No he isnt- there has to be some sort of proof or evidence for him to be arrested.
Now, there may not be enough evidence to convict, but when he got arrested, that meant something did indeed take place
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:13 pm to CoonassBulldog
Im still trying to figure out why Tobias' brothers and dad beat in the girls car?
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:14 pm to DCRebel
quote:
So for MedDawg to legitimately suggest that Mullen pulled Tobias' schooly because of these charges, even though the charges didn't come about until YESTERDAY is beyond dumb.
Damn, I was going to put "after the incident", but wanted to work the word "felony" in there.
So
"Mullen pulled Tobias Manning/Singleton's scholarship offer after the incident."
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:14 pm to RebelNutt48
quote:
Well the WHOLE story isn't out there. Yes, she described something. But that could be totally fabricated. That happens a lot in these types of situations. Can't throw stones at the kid just yet.
How do you guys keep missing what is being stated. Stop trying to figure everything out and read. If... IF what she stated is true, there is going to be visible evidence of it! noway around that..
It would show up in some form. There's too much to it, including the damaged car, for something to not be legit.
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:17 pm to Al Bundy Bulldog
quote:
Im still trying to figure out why Tobias' brothers and dad beat in the girls car?
That's a good question!
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:18 pm to Itsme2011
quote:
If... IF what she stated is true, there is going to be visible evidence of it
ok...I agree. And don't you think that it's highly likely that if she did have visual evidence, the police report would have stated it and it would be in that article?
....because typically articles say those types of things if they are there.
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:22 pm to pankReb
quote:
ok...I agree. And don't you think that it's highly likely that if she did have visual evidence, the police report would have stated it and it would be in that article?
No, I don't. He's not required to. However he does need some shred of evidence to be able to arrest anybody!
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:24 pm to pankReb
And usually if there is proof of visual evidence, the person responsible of it is usually arrested right then and there. They don't wait six weeks. In Georgia they don't at least. Unless this girl waited till yesterday to tell police of the whole incident.
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:24 pm to Itsme2011
quote:
No, I don't. He's not required to. However he does need some shred of evidence to be able to arrest anybody!
ok...and you've yet to show us any evidence to back up your off-the-cuff comments about him being a thug, pos, or whatever you called him a bit ago.
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:34 pm to Itsme2011
quote:
Striking was the word used.. that means more than one hit.
Threw her to the ground...
Punching her.. That is again more than one punch.
Somewhere on that girl is a sign that this took place.....
It's still, at this point, he-said she-said. This is all circumstantial evidence that WOULD NOT BE PERMISSIBLE in court. Just sayin'.
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:35 pm to Itsme2011
quote:
Same thing Auburn people states.. Not so DC. I have zero tolerance for that. None. Again.. with what she described there would be some sort of evidence! PERIOD!
If there were bruises, cuts, scars, etc., then there were DEFINITELY pictures taken. You show me the pictures, and I'll believe you.
I also have zero tolerance regarding violence towards women. But I'm not going to believe every story I hear and just treat it as a foregone conclusion, especially when said conclusion confirms a certain worldview.
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:36 pm to DCRebel
quote:
This is all circumstantial evidence that WOULD NOT BE PERMISSIBLE in court. Just sayin'
True, but the dents and damage to the girls car isnt. It was stated that they did a $3K job on the car. They must have kicked and beat the shite out of that Impala.
That must be how the take care of busines up in Flora.
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:37 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:
No he isnt- there has to be some sort of proof or evidence for him to be arrested.
Now, there may not be enough evidence to convict, but when he got arrested, that meant something did indeed take place
Not at all true. That isn't true for one damn second. There must be PROBABLE CAUSE to arrest someone (of a person says "he attacked me," even if it is a lie, that is probable cause). There must be EVIDENCE to convict someone. Those are not the same things.
WE SUE PEOPLE GOD DAMNIT WHY CAN'T YOU TRACTOR DRIVERS JUST LISTEN TO US?
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:38 pm to Al Bundy Bulldog
quote:
True, but the dents and damage to the girls car isnt. It was stated that they did a $3K job on the car. They must have kicked and beat the shite out of that Impala.
If they can prove that the damage was the result of kicking then yes, that'd be excellent evidence. That's not an easy task, but that's doable I suppose.
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:39 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:Are y'all going to do this?
First off I know you would give your left nut to have committed to state but how about this. Since you have all the facts how about a Ban Bet. If he is convicted I won't post until football season. If he isn't you can't. Deal?
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:40 pm to Itsme2011
quote:
How do you guys keep missing what is being stated. Stop trying to figure everything out and read. If... IF what she stated is true, there is going to be visible evidence of it! noway around that..
So long as you're saying IF then that's fine. Nobody has disagreed with the ALLEGATIONS being POSSIBLE. What we have disagreed with are people treating it as a foregone conclusion that it happened.
I have no fricking clue what took place that night, just as you don't. This girl says it happened, Tobias says it didn't. I have no reason to believe one over the other. It is up to the police, attorneys, and courts to figure that out.
Posted on 1/25/11 at 1:41 pm to Itsme2011
quote:
No, I don't. He's not required to. However he does need some shred of evidence to be able to arrest anybody!
Once again, nope.
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News