Started By
Message
re: This year marks the 80th anniversary of the most controversial title claim in CFB history
Posted on 5/17/21 at 12:06 pm to Wolfhound45
Posted on 5/17/21 at 12:06 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Baw, we were at war
K? Army played 9 games that season, which is 1 less than Bama only because Army declined to play in a bowl. Not sure what you're getting at here.
This post was edited on 5/17/21 at 12:06 pm
1
Posted on 5/17/21 at 12:08 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Not sure what you're getting at here.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 12:12 pm to Wolfhound45
I'm not sure what's so funny. The war ended in September 1945. If they had played the entire season leading up to bowl games, opting out of a bowl that would have been played in late December/early January after the conclusion of the war and after already playing a full season makes no sense.
This post was edited on 5/17/21 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 5/17/21 at 12:23 pm to imjustafatkid
Bammer gonna Bammer. Never change baw 
Posted on 5/17/21 at 1:43 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Like I said. Hosed. We won the Rose Bowl and went undefeated. Army declined the chance to play us. Making them number 1 was a sham.
So a bowl loss should affect a NC claim?
Posted on 5/17/21 at 2:58 pm to RollTide1987
1941: Mississippi State STACKED....traditional SEC powers FRICKED!!!
Posted on 5/17/21 at 4:05 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
So a bowl loss should affect a NC claim?
They didn't play in a bowl at all, so your question is irrelevant.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 6:17 pm to Wolfhound45
quote:
Bammer gonna Bammer. Never change baw
Yep.
I think the InsecureU fricks should just claim a few more.
Why not?
Mulligans
*
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News