Started By
Message
re: The Latest from Chris Low... interesting comments
Posted on 12/3/10 at 8:28 pm to Monticello
Posted on 12/3/10 at 8:28 pm to Monticello
quote:
Unilateral contracts are made every day. You can agree to the terms of a contract before anyone accepts it.
Ahhhh... so now you've morphed the argument from "agreement" to "unilateral contract".
Does the SEC statute address unilateral contracts?
Posted on 12/3/10 at 8:31 pm to TIsuGGER
quote:
Paying for amateur athletes is a violation of the rules (a crime, as it were). Asking for that payment is a solicitation by law. And whether it was agreed that Cam was never getting one peeny, is not an issue. Had MSU paid, no one could possibly have known how the money would be divided.
The SEC statute that was directly quoted required AGREEMENT, a-hole.
See... the thing about this whole Cam affair is you guys will quote some rule that was "violated", be shown that it was no violation, and then morph it to something else and claim YET AGAIN it was violated.
You will continue to fish and fish and fish until you pull yet another turd out of the river yet you will call it a prize bass.
Don't stop believin', brother. Keep the faith!
Posted on 12/3/10 at 8:35 pm to arty
quote:
unilateral contract - a one-sided agreement whereby you promise to do (or refrain from doing) something in return for a performance (not a promise)agreement, understanding - the statement (oral or written) of an exchange of promises; "they had an agreement that they would not interfere in each other's business"; "there was an understanding between management and the workers"
Cecil agreed to accept money for the promise he would deliver Cam to MSU.
You seem to want conveniently ignore the key word "they" in your description above.
"THEY had an AGREEMENT..."
Posted on 12/3/10 at 8:37 pm to creolechef
quote:
Bottom line is that no matter what the NCAA rules the court of public opinion is what matters the most.
The "court of public opinion" elected Jimmy fricking Carter in 1976.
If you are depending on the good will and wisdom of the court of fricking public opinion, you are an utter moron.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 8:39 pm to superman
quote:
Cam Newton is the most dynamic football player I’ve seen in this conference since Herschel Walker.
Vince Young.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 8:43 pm to I Love Bama
quote:
ilovebama
SC is going to have Cam's AU cleat marks all over their chests tomorrow. AU will be pumped for the game and the SEC will have an undefeated team going to the NCG (could be a 5th SEC national champ in a row, involving 4 schools too). SC is in big trouble tomorrow! As the 5th team in the SEC, what bowl do you think SC will go to? What say you?
Posted on 12/3/10 at 8:55 pm to beatbammer
quote:
the thing about this whole Cam affair is
that Chris Low is 100% spot on..that this season by Auburn will forever be tainted, be stamped with an asterick, have a certain unhealthy smell to it etc.... hey, take your pick but it will never ever be respected outside Toomer's Corner.
It is what it is.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 8:58 pm to beatbammer
quote:
See... the thing about this whole Cam affair is you guys will quote some rule that was "violated", be shown that it was no violation, and then morph it to something else and claim YET AGAIN it was violated.
Ah, further proof that denial is more than a river in Egypt. I hope you enjoy that 0-14 when the hammer falls, dickwad.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 9:04 pm to tylerdurden24
This season needs at least this many ******************************************************************************************************************************************************
after it in the record books.
after it in the record books.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 9:11 pm to Katy Tiger
the thing I'm not seeing anyone say is that the NCAA came out and said that Cecil Newton violated a bylaw of the NCAA but they are not punishing Cam.
It's not a question of is there was an infraction because they said there was an infraction by Cecil and Mr. Rogers but the problem people have with it is that there is no punishment for the infraction which is total BS
It's not a question of is there was an infraction because they said there was an infraction by Cecil and Mr. Rogers but the problem people have with it is that there is no punishment for the infraction which is total BS
Popular
Back to top
