Started By
Message
re: The Democrats cheated in the 2020 election. Donald Trump will win in 2024
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:07 pm to Murph4HOF
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:07 pm to Murph4HOF
quote:
I thought OmegaMan was the shittiest Auburn poster in this board.
You're picking up his slack since his banishment.
Mad at someone for whacking your underachieving UGA arse?
1
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:08 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
The decade fits your narrative,
Hell yea it does.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:10 pm to Irons Puppet
If UGA is underachieving, then the Barn is lost in the wilderness.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:10 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Agreeing is the final agreement between the school and the NCAA and an acknowledgment of wrong doings as part of throwing themselves at the mercy of the NCAA. The evidence was stacked against USC, and they knew it and they offered up those vacated wins. You need know how an NCAA investigation works. Remember Bama challenged them on everything relating to Langham. Bama did not cooperate with the NCAA in their investigation, so the NCAA made them forfit those games.
You're just going to keep on making up bullshite aren't you?
USC did appeal. Basically every school appeals if they are able. The NCAA rejected their appeal, as they most often do.
What actually happened was the NCAA started doing vacates rather than forfeits in the late 90s.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:16 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Agreeing is the final agreement between the school and the NCAA and an acknowledgment of wrong doings as part of throwing themselves at the mercy of the NCAA. The evidence was stacked against USC, and they knew it and they offered up those vacated wins. You need TO know how an NCAA investigation works. Remember Bama challenged them on everything relating to Langham. Bama did not cooperate with the NCAA in their investigation, so the NCAA made them forfit those games. And really force the record of Stallings for being defiant.
Where do you come up with this stuff?
Bama appealed the 2005-2007 “textbook gate.” Did we get a bunch of extra “L’s” for doing that?
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:16 pm to 3down10
quote:
You're just going to keep on making up bullshite aren't you?
USC did appeal. Basically every school appeals if they are able. The NCAA rejected their appeal, as they most often do.
What actually happened was the NCAA started doing vacates rather than forfeits in the late 90s.
What part did they appeal? Not the vacated wins.
Remember when AU recently offered up a post season ban on BB two years ago? That is what they agreed to with the NCAA in a preliminary ruling and self-imposed punishment. The NCAA could have come back with stiffer penalties and those could have been appealed. They didn't for Auburn, but many schools they add to it.
And you all pretend to be knowledgeable with how the NCAA works.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:18 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Look it up dumbass. You Google it but never post the difference. Those are the facts around the NCAA and CF. Vacated means the school agreed to not claim the victory, forfeited means the NCAA took the wins away. Because the schools would not agree to vacate the wins. That is the difference. Let's hear your logic with these terms.
The last forfeit the NCAA levied was in 1998.
A forfeit means the team receives a LOSS and the team they played receives a WIN.
A vacated win means the team no longer gets credit for the WIN, it does not go into the Loss column, and the team they beat does not receive a win.
Do some homework, sweet cheeks.
This post was edited on 7/18/22 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:18 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Where do you come up with this stuff?
Bama appealed the 2005-2007 “textbook gate.” Did we get a bunch of extra “L’s” for doing that?
The NCAA and Bama did not think forfeits or vacated wins were appropriate punishment. That is something they both agreed upon. Not every violation is to the level. Damn, you are so ignorant on this subject.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:19 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
The NCAA and Bama did not think forfeits or vacated wins were appropriate punishment. That is something they both agreed upon. Not every violation is to the level. Damn, you are so ignorant on this subject.
You can not be serious right now.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:21 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
The last forfeit the NCAA levied was in 1998.
Do some homework, sweet cheeks.
Tell us sweet cheeks, who was the last school to refuse to admit there were any wrongdoings at their school and refused to cooperate with the NCAA Investigation arm? Again, it is pretty much a plea-bargain by the school to vacate wins if they are caught with their hands in the cookie jar. Bama was just foolish and it cost them.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:24 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
You can not be serious right now.
Tell us then why they did vacate any wins or the NCAA have them forfeit any games because of it. Also explain the timeline of the investigation and how much Bama actually cooperated this time.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:26 pm to Marktastic86
quote:
Just because most of his wins over LSU are forgettable doesn't mean he's having memory issues.
Ohhhh he remembers every single game with LSU.
Hell…..I think he even lost some.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:27 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
The last forfeit the NCAA levied was in 1998.
A forfeit means the team receives a LOSS and the team they played receives a WIN.
A vacated win means the team no longer gets credit for the WIN, it does not go into the Loss column, and the team they beat does not receive a win.
Do some homework, sweet cheeks.
Why the difference sweet cheeks? The NCAA doesn't care what a teams final record is since they do not award a championship in that sport at that level. Conferences can use it to determine a champion, but I haven't seen where they have with forfeited games.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:27 pm to Irons Puppet
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:28 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Why the difference sweet cheeks?
A forfeit is no longer a punishment the NCAA levies, I’m assuming because it doesn’t make sense to give a team a W who didn’t earn one.
However, back to the original topic, I’m glad you have conceded that 2004 USC was undefeated.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:29 pm to Irons Puppet
What does vacating wins really mean?
quote:
I've had several questions from fans wondering what it means for other teams in the SEC now that Alabama has to vacate 21 wins from the 2005, 2006 and 2007 seasons as part of its NCAA penalties for the textbook scandal.
The short answer is ... nothing.
Alabama has to give up those wins, but the other teams don't get the wins.
And in terms of the series record, it's as if those games were never played.
Sound confusing? Well, it is.
Remember, too, that vacating games isn't the same as forfeiting games. In 1993, Alabama had to forfeit nine games because of the Antonio Langham/agent mess, meaning the Crimson Tide's opponents in those games did get the wins.
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:30 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Worst poster is the best poster on here. A counter to the Cult gets my vote.
If I were in your shoes I’d probably cloak myself in this warm blanket as well, but I’d like to challenge you to open your mind to another possibility: that you are actually one of the biggest dumbasses on this board. Don’t react to your emotions here, just breathe and think about this for one second. Forget all the Alabama/Auburn bullshite hyperbole and take note that this board is represented by fans of 14 conference teams and many other schools after that. I’ll submit that, I don’t know, Tennessee and LSU fans typically dislike Bama way more than they dislike Auburn. As do Auburn fans, obviously. Certainly there’s gotta be a bunch of them, or several, (or even just one?) who would chime in and get your back here if it wasn’t universally understood that you were a raving lunatic. This board has a tendency to self-regulate due to all the factions and, yet, time after time we see these snuff film threads where you just make an insane claim that is immediately shown to be objectively false, and then you demonstrate an otherworldly inability to just man up and admit your fault.
I’m embarrassed to admit I just read five pages of this nonsense thread where you hosted yet another one of your endless bukake parties for yourself. Dealing with you is like driving by a car wreck. We all think we’re better. We WANT to be better- but we just can’t help but look. YOU are a 20-car pileup interstate wreck on Christmas Day. Just an absolute, clueless, and sad disaster.
Again- do not react with your emotions. Take a timeout, and just think on this one minute: why doesn’t anyone (including Tennessee, LSU, and fellow Auburn people) think you’re ever right on anything? Doesn’t that strike you as…odd? What is your explanation of this phenomenon? Is it because Alabama is a cult?
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:33 pm to Irons Puppet
Here’s a bit from an article on Textbookgate and a quote from the chair of the committee on infractions.
LINK
quote:
"There is a difference," Dee said."It's not semantics -- it's real -- between vacation and forfeiture," Dee continued. "In vacation, only the team involved, only in wins, do they vacate the wins. In forfeiture, you would not only vacate the win, but the opponent would improve their record. This was not a forfeiture, so therefore the rule only applies to the University of Alabama. It does not allow for any other university to improve its record."
That's why, in Alabama's revised results, the Tide was 0-2 in 2005, 0-7 in 2006, and 2-6 in 2007. Nothing for the opponents changed
LINK
Posted on 7/18/22 at 8:34 pm to Tuscaloosa
Come on Junior, the NCAA works totally different. Again, they do not care about any final record in CF Division I games. You can google any website and get an answer you believe, but the NCAA is the final authority on this. The real reason why forfeits are scarce is because the NCAA has promoted cooperation and wants the schools to submit a report with punishment. That is where the schools choose to vacate wins. Alabama was the last cowboy that got its dick slapped.
Page 16 of 43
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News