Started By
Message

re: Tennessee Wins Injunction Against the NCAA

Posted on 2/25/24 at 2:09 pm to
Posted by Smokeys Howl
Member since Oct 2022
1985 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 2:09 pm to
You're just not smart.
Posted by Smokeys Howl
Member since Oct 2022
1985 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 4:50 pm to
Hearing that the NCAA will make an announcement in short order.
Posted by robvols
Member since Jan 2024
1005 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 5:27 pm to
Joe not at QB means you guys LOSE!
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
14786 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

Joe not at QB means you guys LOSE!


Sure thing, champ.
Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12773 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

Trey Wallace is a Knoxville native and wrote Rocky Top Insider.

I am sure he is completely unbiased and impartial.




You should give us more hard hitting legal analysis on a case you clearly misunderstood or are just simply too stupid to understand.
Posted by LewEvansFan
Member since Mar 2023
3885 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

Trey Wallace is a Knoxville native and wrote Rocky Top Insider. I am sure he is completely unbiased and impartial.


Lolz. You realize his nickname is War Eagle Wallace, right? He’s from Alabama.
Posted by Smokeys Howl
Member since Oct 2022
1985 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 1:48 am to
He thought SPYRE was a single person.

He thought the NCAA would win the injunction case.

He thought NICO would be made ineligible.

He thought UT would get the death penalty.

He thought marketing groups were boosters.

...

He's been wrong on everything so far.
Posted by robvols
Member since Jan 2024
1005 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 8:29 am to
Billy is on the hot seat and you know it!
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
14786 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Billy is on the hot seat and you know it!


Absolutely. Which makes it even funnier when Tennessee still loses to him
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39390 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:01 am to
Good to see the vols bragging about only losing 19 of 25 to Florida.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
13x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
50320 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:06 am to
quote:

He's been wrong on everything so far.


Dis you?

Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
7628 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:14 am to
Big winner: Alabama and Auburn.

Unlike Tennessee which has state NIL laws in place, Alabama doesn't.

By erasing the NCAA's ability to regulate NIL, the only thing that matters will be state laws about NIL.

Alabama has none. Their schools have free reign now in terms of their NIL contracts.
Posted by Cheap Roscoe
Member since Feb 2024
113 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Unlike Tennessee which has state NIL laws in place, Alabama doesn't.

Yes, the lawmakers in a state that just killed the NCAA are going to bring the hammer down.

The University of Tennessee will now tell the legislature how they want the laws written, and those laws will pass with huge bipartisan support.

Hell, the taxpayer may wind up picking up the tab for UT recruits.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
14786 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Hell, the taxpayer may wind up picking up the tab for UT recruits.


And rainbows on unicorns might lift UT to the sky to win their first SEC championship since Crystal Pepsi went out of production.
Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
7628 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Yes, the lawmakers in a state that just killed the NCAA are going to bring the hammer down.

The University of Tennessee will now tell the legislature how they want the laws written, and those laws will pass with huge bipartisan support.

Hell, the taxpayer may wind up picking up the tab for UT recruits.


Be that as it may, until they change those laws they can be sued under them. It won't be a criminal suit, so it's not like the state has to initiate the lawsuit. A competitor for signing the player can bring suit.

Alabama doesn't have that issue. YOu effectively won't have any grounds to bring a lawsuit against them for NIL matters. They can do whatever they want.
Posted by Cheap Roscoe
Member since Feb 2024
113 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Be that as it may, until they change those laws they can be sued under them. It won't be a criminal suit, so it's not like the state has to initiate the lawsuit. A competitor for signing the player can bring suit

Who would have to enforce those laws?

That same AG that just went after the NCAA.

Keep hoping and praying for a miracle. It's not coming.

quote:

Alabama doesn't have that issue. YOu effectively won't have any grounds to bring a lawsuit against them for NIL matters. They can do whatever they want.


GREAT! So will we. That's the whole point.
This post was edited on 2/26/24 at 9:37 am
Posted by Cheap Roscoe
Member since Feb 2024
113 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:48 am to
quote:

And rainbows on unicorns might lift UT to the sky to win their first SEC championship since Crystal Pepsi went out of production

If this was Bama, LSU, or UGA talking, you might have a case.

You're rolling up on close to 20 years.

5-7 trying to talk trash.

You'll be lucky to win 5 games this year.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
14786 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:48 am to
quote:

5-7 trying to talk trash.


29-16
Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
7628 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Who would have to enforce those laws?

That same AG that just went after the NCAA.


They're CIVIL laws, not CRIMINAL laws.

Any party that can claim financial damage from the laws being broken can bring suit. That means any other school or collective for a school or simply a company who wanted to sign the player for advertising purposes who was outbid even if not affiliated with the school. If state rules for NIL were broken, they can sue.

Now UNLIKE NCAA violations, where the player and company signing the contract wouldn't be touched but instead the school is hit with sanctions, it wouldn't work that way with these. Those being sued would be the signees of the contract that was in violation of state law. The player himself and the company he signed the NIL deal with.

So it's better for the schools, but much worse for the player.

It does add interesting "meta-gaming" situations where schools could have their collectives sue players/collectives for other schools to disrupt their college football season by making them appear in court.
Posted by Cheap Roscoe
Member since Feb 2024
113 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 9:52 am to
quote:

29-16
Congrats on winning the closest thing you could to a bowl game.
Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15 16 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter