Started By
Message
re: Targeting?
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:10 pm to RTRnFlorida
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:10 pm to RTRnFlorida
quote:
1st and goal from the 2 is different than 3rd and goal. The no call absolutely impacted the game
I get it but when your team, Alabama included, needs a call to help actually score in a ball game it just doesn’t sting as bad.
1
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:20 pm to labamafan
Don’t disagree.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:23 pm to RTRnFlorida
quote:
Don’t disagree
It’s happened to Bama this year in a loss. It just felt cheap
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:26 pm to labamafan
I don’t think it should have or expected it to be called.
Let the players decide the game.
Marcel decided it, unfortunately.
Was a big hit. Well timed.
Let the players decide the game.
Marcel decided it, unfortunately.
Was a big hit. Well timed.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:30 pm to RTRnFlorida
quote:
1st and goal from the 2 is different than 3rd and goal. The no call absolutely impacted the game.
Right call.
Helmet to helmet isnt necessarily targeting. He made a play on the ball, side of helmets hit each other.
You dont want the officials deciding the game on a controversial call.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News