Started By
Message
re: TAMU Couldn't? Could They? Naw, Huh?
Posted on 10/19/11 at 1:13 am to DesignatedT
Posted on 10/19/11 at 1:13 am to DesignatedT
quote:
If he can get the right D coordinator there is no reason to think he can't be successful in the SEC though. Verdict is still up in the air regarding Tim Deruyter.
have you seen your defense lately?
Verdict is in... GUILTY of 1st Degree Suckage
1
Posted on 10/19/11 at 4:41 am to LarrySellers
#5 rushing D in the country. We have half of the equation right.... :P
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:08 am to cokebottleag
1/3 of the equation right. #1 in sacks and #5 in rushing D. Near the bottom in forcing turnovers and dead last in pass defense.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 6:29 am to cokebottleag
quote:
cokebottleag
quote:
:P
Did you seriously just type that? aTm fans literally couldn't get any gayer but damn I'll give you credit for pushing the limits.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 7:35 am to Boarford T Justice
quote:
Posted by Boarford T Justice
collie?
I thought it was a Shetland Sheepdog.
Shetlands are miniature collies.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:25 am to oklahogjr
quote:
quote:
Who gets raises in the SEC after a 9-4 season?
any of Jimmy sexton's coaches...
Posted on 10/19/11 at 8:26 am to TheBloodTypo
Offense in general? we lose 3 starters on offense. Granted they Are QB1 RB1 and WR1 but we actually have good depth at all of those. 3 guys behind Tannehill that could start for 4 B12 teams right now as RS Freshman or Freshman, C-Mike will come back (Sherman's influence) Ben Malena and RS running backs are all good, and WR depth is probably the best its ever been at A&M, got Swope/EZ/Hicks/McNeal all back next year.
This post was edited on 10/19/11 at 8:37 am
Posted on 10/19/11 at 9:13 am to texmariner84
C-Mike's coming back, as is the entire Oline. Swope and Nwachukwu will reprise their roles at WR.
Replacing Tannehill, Fuller, and Gray won't be easy, but let's not act like A&M won't still have some pieces next year.
Replacing Tannehill, Fuller, and Gray won't be easy, but let's not act like A&M won't still have some pieces next year.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 9:19 am to cokebottleag
Our Rush D isn't as good as it is ranked. We are only playing pass happy teams that do nothing but throw the ball. Given that, our Pass D isn't as bad as it is ranked. Granted it still blows, but it is not dead last bad.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 9:24 am to choog
Also, we are #1 in sacks. Theres a significant chunk of negative rushing yards that should be credited to pass defense, rather than rush defense.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 9:30 am to JJxvi
Because we have a piss-poor secondary, TimmyD has resorted to a blitz happy defense. It's very risk/reward though--hence our leading in sacks yet bringing up the rear in pass D.
That said, we've faced quite a few air it out type offenses, and I'll be curious to see what happens the rest of the year as we play a few more traditional teams. I think it'll balance out a little.
That said, we've faced quite a few air it out type offenses, and I'll be curious to see what happens the rest of the year as we play a few more traditional teams. I think it'll balance out a little.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 9:36 am to TbirdSpur2010
Until OU puts up 750 pass yards on us anyway...
Posted on 10/19/11 at 9:49 am to JJxvi
Count me in the camp that thinks the A&M/OU game will be closer than many believe. Not a sunshine pumper, but we did beat these guys last year, and we've got little to play for but pride this year--could be a favorable result for A&M if everything falls right. We'll see.
Posted on 10/19/11 at 9:52 am to TbirdSpur2010
For some reason I have little faith....
65-10
42-14
36-30
77-0
31-10
51-6
65-10
42-14
36-30
77-0
31-10
51-6
Posted on 10/19/11 at 10:14 am to JJxvi
quote:
For some reason I have little faith....
65-10
42-14
36-30
77-0
31-10
51-6
Good reason.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News