Started By
Message
re: Stoops takes a jab at Aggies and Mizzou
Posted on 3/8/12 at 3:49 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Posted on 3/8/12 at 3:49 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
That argument only has merit if you believe your premise, which I don't. WVU and TCU are making lateral moves into the Big 8. Misurah and eATMe are taking a HUGE step up. in competition.
Okay. So who in the big 12 is going to suffer from TCU's and WVU's competition? Somebody has to go up and somebody has to go down. Either these two will or one of the Bevo Dong Suckers will. Can't be both ways.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 3:49 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
WVU and TCU are making lateral moves into the Big 8.
He's just another angry, delusional little hog fan. His kind make the reasonable hog fans look bad. Don't give him the response he's looking for and maybe he'll go away.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 3:51 pm to semotruman
quote:
reasonable hog fans

I'm actually looking forward to seeing him try to argue this
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:04 pm to BenHOGan
quote:
That argument only has merit if you believe your premise, which I don't. WVU and TCU are making lateral moves into the Big 8. Misurah and eATMe are taking a HUGE step up. in competition.

Man some of you Arkansas fans are either completely stupid, blinded by your hatred for the new kids in the conference or are absolutely atrocious at trolling.
Either way, it really makes your fan base look turible.
This post was edited on 3/8/12 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:09 pm to Alahunter
TCU and WV have had the benefit of being in weaker conferences. I will bet that they both will be average in the Big 12, behind Texas, Oklahoma, OSU.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:17 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Okay. So who in the big 12 is going to suffer from TCU's and WVU's competition? Somebody has to go up and somebody has to go down. Either these two will or one of the Bevo Dong Suckers will. Can't be both ways.
I didn't say the Big 8 was going to suffer now that Misurah and eATMe came in. I said that WV and TCU will not suffer as much as eATMe and Misurah do with their respective moves.
Follow me here, Aggie. I'll type slow so you can keep up....Playing at TT, Baylor (without RGIII), Iowa State, at Kansas are either not as difficult as playing the middle and bottom tiers of their old conferences, or it's a push. The top of the WAC/Mountain West (or whatever TCU's conference was calling itself last year) and the top of the Big East are a cut below the top tier of the Big 8, but not a whole lot. WVU and TCU will get their brains pounded in by teh top tier of the Big 8 - as you did. But they will fit right into the middle/lower tier of the Big 8 as y'all did.
Meanwhile, eATMe and Misurah will move up considerably in competition. The Mississippi schools, Vandy and Kentucky equate nicely to the bottom tier of the Big 8, but after that, every one of the remaining teams will possess the ability to blow your doors off. They/we won't do it in every game, but the potential will be there. And it's that grind that will eventually beat you down.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:21 pm to kilo
quote:
blinded by your hatred for the new kids in the conference
I want to be very clear. I do not hate the new kids. I lack respect for Misurah, but I do not hate them. I'd have to care about them to hate them.
As for eATMe, I think they are a good addition if we had to expand. They have some tradition, and they know how to properly hate Texas. They get respect for that. Lose some for the dude cheerleaders, though.
I just know we could have and should have done better than adding misurah. I think it's something conference leadership and the other member schools will soon wish had not been done.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:22 pm to BenHOGan
quote:
BenHOGan
quote:
I want to be very clear. I do not hate the new kids
Then you are stupid or a terrible troll.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:26 pm to kilo
quote:
I want to be very clear. I do not hate the new kids
Then you are stupid or a terrible troll.
Reading comprehension isn't your "thing" is it kilo? I stated my reasons for saying your team and the ags won't fare as well in your moves as WV and TCU will in theirs. My reasons are valid and will be proven to be true.
Nothing hateful or stupid about it. Nothing trolling about it either. Just my opinion. Misurah, especailly, brings nothing to the league. And they are delusional to think that the move over to the SEC - even the "weaker" East - will go smoothly. Rude awakening on your horizon.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:28 pm to BenHOGan
quote:
Reading comprehension isn't your "thing" is it kilo? I stated my reasons for saying your team and the ags won't fare as well in your moves as WV and TCU will in theirs. My reasons are valid and will be proven to be true. Nothing hateful or stupid about it. Nothing trolling about it either. Just my opinion. Misurah, especailly, brings nothing to the league. And they are delusional to think that the move over to the SEC - even the "weaker" East - will go smoothly. Rude awakening on your horizon.
Except that's NOT what you said.
You are backtracking now that people called your dumb arse out.

This post was edited on 3/8/12 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:28 pm to BenHOGan
quote:
BenHOGan
Your argument is so full of holes and twisted logic.
You are trying to make and argument that the Big East and MWC are fairly comparable to the Big 12, (I hate the conference too, but it is probably the 2nd best conference in football).
Are you telling me there is a bigger gap between the SEC and the Big 12 than the Big 12 and the Mountain fricking West?
quote:
Baylor (without RGIII)

What a stupid premise for an argument. Take Cam Newton off 2010 Auburn and what happens?
quote:
TT, Baylor (without RGIII), Iowa State, at Kansas are either not as difficult as playing the middle and bottom tiers of their old conferences, or it's a push
You are really arguing New Mexico > Baylor?
Or UNLV > Iowa State?
Terrible, arrogant troll.
This post was edited on 3/8/12 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:29 pm to kilo
quote:
Except that's NOT what you said.
It was EXACTLY what I said and the point I was making. Thus, you continue to perpetuate the truism that your reading comprehension is poor.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:30 pm to BreakawayZou83
quote:
BreakawayZou83
I am sure the quality Hog posters on the SECr get embarrassed by this kind of shite.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:31 pm to kilo
quote:
kilo
I think it's time we ignore the Hog troll. This guy is actually worse than DaleDenton and SunHog.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:33 pm to BenHOGan
quote:
BenHOGan
Hey turd bunrer, its been quoted, and still here in this thread in your original post.
You back peddled quicker than shite.
I am sure now that you are stupid AND hate the new kids. You are just not intelligent enough to be trolling.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:35 pm to BreakawayZou83
quote:
Take Cam Newton off 2010 Auburn and what happens?
That Auburn team beats your hypothetical Baylor team by 2 TDs.
quote:
SEC and the Big 12 than the Big 12 and the Mountain fricking West?
I am ABSOLUTELY saying that. Big 8, MW and BE are all top-heavy with an inordinate number of bottom feeders. The middle tier of the SEC is far tougher than the middle tier of the Big 8.
quote:
You are really arguing New Mexico > Baylor?
Or UNLV > Iowa State?
If that's what you got out of it, then you're way off. NM, Baylor, Vegas, Iowa State - those are ALL bottom-feeders that you should easily beat. There are MORE of those type teams in the Big 8, MW, BE, than there are in the SEC. THAT is the comparison. You are going to encounter significantly fewer of those types of teams in the SEC than you would in the Big 8, MW,or BE. Gone are the 5 or 6 weeks when you could not just pencil in the conference win, but you could write it in pen in July. You may get 1 or 2 a year now. At best.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:38 pm to BenHOGan
quote:
That Auburn team beats your hypothetical Baylor team by 2 TDs.
You completely missed the point.

I honestly can't tell at this point if you are mind-blowingly stupid and arrogant or just a pro troll...
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:39 pm to kilo
quote:
Hey turd bunrer, its been quoted, and still here in this thread in your original post.
You back peddled quicker than shite.
I am sure now that you are stupid AND hate the new kids. You are just not intelligent enough to be trolling.
Lighten up, Francis. The undeniable truth of the matter has gotten you WAY worked up.
IF I were trolling, which I most certainly am not, then I'd say it was an unqualified success.
And you and I both know, I never backtracked on anything. Made a point. Got you mad. Backed it up. Got you more mad. Finally you resorted to name calling.
Best you just simmer down and probably not click on/read anything else you see the name BenHOGan next to.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:40 pm to BenHOGan
quote:
Best you just simmer down and probably not click on/read anything else you see the name BenHOGan next to.
Deal. If you could go one step further and stop posting, that'd be even better.
Posted on 3/8/12 at 4:42 pm to BreakawayZou83
quote:
Deal. If you could go one step further and stop posting, that'd be even better.
What?!? And deprive myself of the opportunity to engage your rapier wit and insightful skill at constructive debate? NEVER!
Back to top
