Started By
Message
re: Stevan Ridley vs Mark ingram in the pros
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:38 pm to thunderbird1100
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:38 pm to thunderbird1100
The aints suck.
2
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:39 pm to thatdude1985
Good excuse on why he's fricking terrible.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:39 pm to hg
quote:
Oh like when drew threw it to him on a screen last week and he fricking fell down on his own when it was a sure TD? He's fricking terrible.
Oh like when Drew "Let me Stat Pad all night" Brees threw a screen pass on the rare occasion that he does to MI?
I guaran-fricking-tee you that if Mark was getting treated fairly by a different team he would be tearing it up.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:40 pm to thatdude1985
quote:
The aints suck.
butthurt
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:40 pm to LSUNV
quote:
Saints are a pass first Team, what doesn't make sense, our run blocking sucks regardless
It only sucks with Mark Ingram in the game apparently
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:40 pm to hg
quote:
Pierre Thomas and Chris Ivory say hey.
Mark Ingram is mother fricking garbage.
Ingram is a different style running back and doesn't fit their style. Glad you're not the typical LSU/Saints fan.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:40 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
MOAR. SHITTY. EXCUSES.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:41 pm to hg
He's a better RB than you, but you don't see him coming on forums talking shite about shitty posters.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:41 pm to Schwaaz
MOAR
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:41 pm to hg
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:41 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
So the excuse Bama homers are rolling with is the Saints OL blocks for all their other RBs but not for Ingram.
I'm going with outside of their passing game the saints just suck in general. It's a shame MI talents are wasting there.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:41 pm to wildtigercat93
I bow to your genius football knowledge. You apparently should be coaching and not chatting in a forum
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:42 pm to thatdude1985
quote:
He's a better RB than you, but you don't see him coming on forums talking shite about shitty posters.
What in the frick is this shite?
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:42 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
I guaran-fricking-tee you that if Mark was getting treated fairly by a different team he would be tearing it up.
What exactly is the "unfair treatment" hes getting?
He receieves a check and plays football and the coaches use him as they see fit. Why does he deserve anything other than that? He certainly hasnt earned anything on the field, so why is a 2nd year back supposed to be given carries and touches he didnt earn?
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:43 pm to hg
I am laughing out loud right now.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:43 pm to Schwaaz
quote:
Ingram is a different style running back and doesn't fit their style
What?
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:43 pm to hg
you're just jealous you suck at RB!!!!! 
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:43 pm to LSUNV
quote:
I bow to your genius football knowledge. You apparently should be coaching and not chatting in a forum
Wut? Im not saying the Saints should be playing Ingram and more/less
Just that hes not that good of a running back and you can disprove that by saying the run blocking sucks only when he comes into the game
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:44 pm to wildtigercat93
I mean frick he gets more playing time than he deserves. He plays like shite while Ivory balls and gets less game action.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 4:44 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
exactly is the "unfair treatment" hes getting?
Let's see.
MI comes in.
MI runs a dive play.
Defense stops it.
MI leaves.
MI comes in later.
Same thing happens.
IT IS THE ONLY WAY WE USE HIM.
Page 3 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News