PP7 for heisman

Good. Did not want LSU bidding on a guy that’s done nothing in 3 years on the football field.

He’s a great athlete who is not a great football player. Like Chris Hilton, his most impactful position on the football field is gunner. He’s not worth whatever he would demand. Not even close.

quote:

---

He ain’t built for the NIL era

---

I mean he did sign the best DL class in school history.

Maybe he just doesn't want to keep dealing with it, but he's certainly "built" for it.

quote:

---

He’s a nepo baby so he will go with daddy

---

He's not related to Frank.

quote:

---

OC push.

---

Just not true.

quote:

---

RB coach is a recruiting position.

---

You won't be saying that when your RB underperform their ranking year after year. Frank was, at one point, the best recruiter in CFB. Relationships still matter, but above board money has changed things. Frank was an all time bag man in his day. What happened with Jakeem Stewart last year would not, in a million years, have happened in say 2012. I like Frank. I know his family. I am just telling you the hard truth about his role and ability in modern CFB. It's not the same.

Even though he's a great relationship guy, his relationships matter more at LSU. Ole Miss won't be going into New Orleans and pulling 5 stars. I don't remember the last time Ole Miss won a recruiting battle (in which Frank could be a part of given his connections) over LSU. Frank is going to get the same guys Ole Miss has been getting forever.

shite, he might even give you a very slight bump, but his actual running backs (something OM has thrived with in the Kiffin era) will underperform.

You did not push or upgrade at the offensive coordinator or running backs coach positions. Frank Wilson is not who you think he is. Our running game (outside of Jayden Daniels) has been abysmal for the last 4 years.

Even if you did push or upgrade (you didn't), "outside of the HC" is doing a lot of heavy lifting.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

I can't tell who else is in this, but those four certainly are.

quote:

---

It is and yet you continuously perpetuate the myth that he has had bad offensive lines even though the data says otherwise.

---

Let's look at that data that disproves the "myth" that the bengals have had horrendous offensive lines.

2020 - 30th
2021 - 20th
2022 - 31st
2023 - 26th
2024 - 28th

Burrow has had a below average offensive line one time in his NFL career and went to the super bowl. Good try though!

TheeRealCarolina told me just yesterday that he was better than Burrow.

Am I missing something?

Those one year rentals in AJ Haulcey and Mansoor Delane really blew this year.

I hate having SEC ready first team all american's ready to step in and take over a starting spot.

quote:

---

Tua and Burrow were drafted the same year and everyone calls Tua injury-prone but he has played 4 more games than Burrow has.

Burrow is suppose to be the “winner” and yet Tua has a higher career winning percentage.

Truth is though, Hurts and Herbert are better than both of them.

---

Which stats matter? Because Burrow has more passing yards and touchdowns than Hurts despite playing 20 less games. He's got a better winning percentage and per game numbers across the board than Herbert. He has better stats at every single measurable statistic than Tua.

Joe Burrow is 5-2 in the playoffs.

Justin Herbert is 0-2 in the playoffs.

Tua is 0-1 in the playoffs.

Hurts is 6-3 in the playoffs.

So let's break down when these things matter:

- Regular season winning percentage only matters in the Burrow vs. Tua debate and Burrow vs. Hurts debate. They do not matter in the Burrow vs. Herbert debate.

- Post season winning percentage does not matter in any of the debates.

- Passing statistics do not matter at all.

- Stats, outside of winning percentage, do not matter at all in the Burrow vs. Tua debate or the Burrow vs. Hurts debate.

- Post season per game stats do not matter at all in any of the debates.

Got it.