Started By
Message
re: Stetson Bennett will pass for 4000 yards this year
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:33 pm to Jumpinjack
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:33 pm to Jumpinjack
Georgia was the better team. Proved it all year. We didn’t struggle and we didn’t lose to the likes of an A&M. Bama was lucky to beat UF and should have lost to AU.
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:35 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Oregon has no business scoring 24 in game 1 with a brand new O vs an extremely talented D.
Oregon lost one OL and has a senior qb. Lanning will have intimate knowledge on where to attack too.
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:35 pm to SaturdayNAthens
Most Bama fans acknowledge this but there's a few out there that don't, and the internet makes a few seem like many.
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:38 pm to bisonduck
I will bet $100 to your favorite charity against $100 to my favorite charity that uga beats Oregon, point spread be damned.
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:40 pm to deeprig9
Are you saying straight up or with the spread?
This post was edited on 6/5/22 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:47 pm to mbogo
quote:
They were healthy enough to play. Funny you went to using players who actually played in the games.
Major difference between 100% and 76%.
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:48 pm to Jumpinjack
quote:
I'm not arguing, we choked. Fricking BillO and PeteG, God awful coaches.
Ok.
Look. You guys had/have a great team. Things just fell our way this year. In order to win a title a team has to have a lot of talent and a little luck. We had some luck, and you guys just couldn't catch a break. Next year Alabama will be in the driver's seat.
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:50 pm to bisonduck
quote:
Oregon lost one OL and has a senior qb. Lanning will have intimate knowledge on where to attack too.
Oregon has earned respect in my book. Y'all be a good OSU team, and if we take the game lightly it could come back to bite us.
I don't think we take you lightly, but that's why they play the game.
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:51 pm to mbogo
quote:
"He had a clean tear. Most of the time you have an ACL tear, other ligaments get torn and you have some meniscus damage. He didn’t have any of that, which is great.”
Who is this referring to?
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:54 pm to DawgsLife
Yawn, it's over. Uga finally won one when it mattered most. Next season is coming within 3 months.
It's just bitching or bragging at this point. Move on. Looking at what could have been or what was will catch you chasing that high for 40+ years.
It's just bitching or bragging at this point. Move on. Looking at what could have been or what was will catch you chasing that high for 40+ years.
This post was edited on 6/5/22 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 6/5/22 at 8:58 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Oregon has no business scoring 24 in game 1 with a brand new O vs an extremely talented D.
I am not too confident in a win. However, Oregon could put up some points.
Posted on 6/5/22 at 11:45 pm to bisonduck
I take that back. Looks like it’s -18.5.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 1:45 am to DawgsLife
quote:
He came back for the one game and reinjured his injury and did not play in the other games.
Show me the injury list where he is on it and I will acknowledge his absence due to injury.
No activities. He wasn't a part of the team.
quote:
Correct. But if a player has been playing all year and all of a sudden he doesn't show up, then there's a pretty good chance he was injured.
So, you don't know if he was injured you are just saying there is a good chance. If he was injured there are lists and reports for such things.
Agiye Hall was actually on the depth chart, 2nd string. This guy you are using was never going to play he was so far down any chart. To use him is a joke.
Pickens saying he was 100 pct and Saban saying something about the game somehow equates? Georgia did deserve to win since the team with the most point at the end of the game deserves to win. It's why they had more pointsa that we are discussing.
I didn't say Saban doesn't know what he is taking about. I said he couldn't come out and say Bama lost because of injuries for political reasons. But, he has mentioned the injuries. Pickens was just answering a simple innocuous question about when he was 100 pct. His answer had no ramifications however he answered it.
No, most of the players you mentioned weren't starting players. Smith and Ratledge were the only injured starters. Not only did Bama have over 3 times as many starters out but some of the starters they lost were vital, irreplaceable players.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 1:46 am to djsdawg
quote:
Major difference between 100% and 76%.
Major is playing vs not playing. But, if you want to destroy your depth argument by saying Georgia's backups were 24 pct worse than the starters so they had to play the starters...
Bama had 2 OLs(not the center who was already out) go out against Cincy and didn't return. They played a week later, so we have to assume they weren't 100 pct so it only make it worse when you try to use the "not 100 pct" absuridty.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 6:56 am to Che Boludo
quote:Absolutely did. This looks like it is Alabama's season coming up. Y'all are loaded.
Yawn, it's over. Uga finally won one when it mattered most. Next season is coming within 3 months.
quote:That's what I have been trying to tell Bamma fans. But muh, #Injuries
It's just bitching or bragging at this point. Move on. Looking at what could have been or what was will catch you chasing that high for 40+ years.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 6:59 am to bisonduck
You responded to me, but I didn't say this:
quote:
Oregon has no business scoring 24 in game 1 with a brand new O vs an extremely talented D.
quote:We have a lot of talent coming back on defense, but we will also be very young in places. I could see oregon putting up some points. (By some I mean more than most did last year) Oregon has been pretty strong offensively....at east in the past, so I assume you are now.
I am not too confident in a win. However, Oregon could put up some points.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 7:20 am to mbogo
quote:
Show me the injury list where he is on it and I will acknowledge his absence due to injury.
Injury list?
SDo, in your mind Georgia decided not to play our #3 RB just because? We kept in on the bench even though every other game he was healthy he played in?
quote:
No activities. He wasn't a part of the team.
What activities are you talking about? Practice we have tons of players that were hurt and not practicing...so what activities are you talking about.
besides....no matter why he had production that was missing. It doesn't matter if it was because of injury, suspension, death in the family, he quit or any other reason. His production we had all year was missing and he was a projected 1st round draft pick.
Crap, if he had a parent that died you would say he chose to go to their funeral instead of playing in the game so we can't count him. You're a piece of work. He played all year and we missed his production.
quote:Do tell. Why don't you just use logic instead? he averaged 7 carries a game when he was healthy and then he strained hi MCL.After that it got spotty. Why do you think?
If he was injured there are lists and reports for such things.
quote:And, according to Tide fans failed miserably. Your coaching staff should have gotten your backups some reps.
Agiye Hall was actually on the depth chart, 2nd string.
quote:Really? Do tell. Where was he on our depth chart? Tell me then sit back and I will show you where you are wrong.
This guy you are using was never going to play he was so far down any chart. To use him is a joke.
quote:Which is stupid. When has Saban EVER minced words because of "political" reasons? he just accused a former assistant of cheating in the national media, but now you are saying he guards his words?
I didn't say Saban doesn't know what he is taking about. I said he couldn't come out and say Bama lost because of injuries for political reasons.
quote:Except for Adam Anderson, George Pickens, Dominick Blaylock, and several of the others would have rotated in for significant playing time.
No, most of the players you mentioned weren't starting players. Smith and Ratledge were the only injured starters.
If not for injuries there is not telling how badly we would have beaten Alabama.
quote:Name them. I am betting most of them played, and in your world you can't count them. I mean if they played in the game they were healthy, right?
Not only did Bama have over 3 times as many starters out but some of the starters they lost were vital, irreplaceable players.
Posted on 6/6/22 at 7:40 am to mbogo
quote:
Major is playing vs not playing.
Ok, let’s go with that……
Adam Anderson didn’t play, so using this logic, it was major.
quote:
Bama had 2 OLs(not the center who was already out) go out against Cincy and didn't return.
So they weren’t hurt enough to miss a single game.
On the other hand, I am talking about guys hurt enough to miss numerous games. Hell, smith didn’t even start in Atlanta. That’s how questionable he was.
Popular
Back to top


1





