Started By
Message
SP+ Rankings - Week 2
Posted on 9/7/21 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 9/7/21 at 7:52 pm
quote:
It is, as always, important to note that SP+ is intended to be predictive and forward-facing. It is not a résumé ranking that gives credit for big wins or particularly brave scheduling -- no good predictive system is. It is simply a measure of the most sustainable and predictable aspects of football. If you're lucky or unimpressive in a win, your rating will probably fall. If you're strong and unlucky in a loss, it will probably rise.
SP+ Rankings - Week 2
Ranking. Team (Off, Def)
1. Alabama (2, 3)
2. Georgia (15, 2)
3. Ohio State (1, 31)
4. Oklahoma (3, 30)
5. Penn State (20, 4)
6. Clemson (17, 5)
7. Michigan (14, 10)
8. Texas A&M (19, 8)
9. Southern Cal (7, 19)
10. Cincinnati (25, 7)
11. Utah (22, 9)
12. Iowa (51, 1)
13. Auburn (21, 11)
14. Florida (6, 32)
15. Ole Miss (4, 48)
16. Texas (9, 29)
17. UCLA (5, 50)
18. Wisconsin (50, 6)
19. Iowa State (16, 27)
20. Washington (27, 23)
21. Arizona State (33, 21)
22. North Carolina (8, 65)
23. Oregon (26, 33)
24. Virginia Tech (23, 40)
25. Miami (30, 34)
38. Kentucky (58, 24)
43. Tennessee (69, 22)
45. Arkansas (61, 38)
50. LSU (40, 66)
59. Missouri (66, 53)
60. Mississippi State (78, 43)
69. South Carolina (75, 58)
114. Vanderbilt (117, 97)
5
Posted on 9/7/21 at 7:53 pm to SummerOfGeorge
SEC Week 1 Opponents
6. Clemson (17, 5)
17. UCLA (5, 50)
25. Miami (30, 34)
74. Louisville (31, 108)
82. Florida Atlantic (100, 55)
95. Central Michigan (92, 93)
107. Kent State (63, 125)
109. Louisiana Tech (105, 105)
118. Rice (125, 78)
124. Bowling Green (128, 114)
125. ULM (120, 127)
126. Akron (126, 124)
SEC Week 2 Opponents
16. Texas (9, 29)
27. Pittsburgh (55, 15)
29. NC State (47, 20)
48. UAB (95, 12)
75. Colorado (87, 61)
92. East Carolina (81, 101)
105. Colorado State (114, 87)
116. South Florida (118, 95)
SEC Week 3 Opponents
5. Penn State (20, 4)
35. Memphis (53, 26)
55. Tulane (28, 83)
90. Stanford (76, 98)
95. Central Michigan (92, 93)
102. Georgia Southern (109, 88)
122. New Mexico (108, 119)
6. Clemson (17, 5)
17. UCLA (5, 50)
25. Miami (30, 34)
74. Louisville (31, 108)
82. Florida Atlantic (100, 55)
95. Central Michigan (92, 93)
107. Kent State (63, 125)
109. Louisiana Tech (105, 105)
118. Rice (125, 78)
124. Bowling Green (128, 114)
125. ULM (120, 127)
126. Akron (126, 124)
SEC Week 2 Opponents
16. Texas (9, 29)
27. Pittsburgh (55, 15)
29. NC State (47, 20)
48. UAB (95, 12)
75. Colorado (87, 61)
92. East Carolina (81, 101)
105. Colorado State (114, 87)
116. South Florida (118, 95)
SEC Week 3 Opponents
5. Penn State (20, 4)
35. Memphis (53, 26)
55. Tulane (28, 83)
90. Stanford (76, 98)
95. Central Michigan (92, 93)
102. Georgia Southern (109, 88)
122. New Mexico (108, 119)
This post was edited on 9/7/21 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 9/7/21 at 8:02 pm to SummerOfGeorge
How the frick did the UGA offense grade out at 15?? LOL
Posted on 9/7/21 at 8:03 pm to JackTraven
quote:
How the frick did the UGA offense grade out at 15?? LOL
Still has some preseason stuff in it, plus it recognizes UGA was playing the #5 defense (same reasons Clemson's offense is #17).
If UGA has 315 yards and 27 points against UAB this weekend? I'm guessing they'll be down around 25-30 the next week.
Posted on 9/7/21 at 8:07 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I have missed aggressive defense greatly. I hate Chris Allen was hurt.
It was awesome watching a game 1 vs a Veteran, quality QB and seeing the D just pin their ears back at times and attack.
I'm convinced the strength of an attacking Saban D lies with the strength and football IQ of his interior LBs.
Things look good on D as a whole. Love the pressure off the edges. Strength upfront and athletic, aggressive secondary (so damn aggressive one Drew a PI for simply being on the field).
It was awesome watching a game 1 vs a Veteran, quality QB and seeing the D just pin their ears back at times and attack.
I'm convinced the strength of an attacking Saban D lies with the strength and football IQ of his interior LBs.
Things look good on D as a whole. Love the pressure off the edges. Strength upfront and athletic, aggressive secondary (so damn aggressive one Drew a PI for simply being on the field).
Posted on 9/7/21 at 8:08 pm to SummerOfGeorge
LSU too high
Posted on 9/7/21 at 8:58 pm to SummerOfGeorge
UCLA #5 offense
LSU #66 defense
Sheesh
LSU #66 defense
Sheesh
Posted on 9/7/21 at 9:29 pm to Jebadeb
quote:
UCLA #5 offense
LSU #66 defense
Sheesh
I’ll add in a sheesh with UCLA being 50 on defense
Posted on 9/7/21 at 9:43 pm to SummerOfGeorge
LSU too high
Posted on 9/7/21 at 10:09 pm to SummerOfGeorge
19 on offense with 5 turnovers. I'll take it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News