Started By
Message

re: So Ben Tate is faster than McCluster?

Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:18 pm to
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

it was the best he's ever had

that's laughable. It clearly wasn't.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:18 pm to
I'll take it you don't wish to answer that question.
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Do you not want to answer why his performance is so bad?

i absolutely want to discuss this... do you want to discuss you blatant lie?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:19 pm to
And perhaps, Scott isn't as good as folks are making out either.
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:19 pm to
do you think glen coffee was a productive running back at alabama!?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:21 pm to
Again, deflection of the question. You won't answer, because you'll have to admit that I'm right in either he isn't as good as you want to believe, or his coaching has failed him, or a combination of both.
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:21 pm to
ok lets take anthony dixon... would you say he was a productive back for miss state?
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:22 pm to
charles scott rushed for 1200 yards.... 5.4 yards a carry and 18 touchdowns in only full season
Posted by tigahfromtheham
On your left
Member since Jun 2005
5851 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

will be lucky to get drafted.


quote:

Injury prone


quote:

A product of the coaching he's had


quote:

a soft player with a bad work ethic


quote:

I've stated nothing but facts


Quit being a douche and a dumbass. You've stated your opinon. Scott wasn't healed enough to participate a month ago at the Senior Bowl what makes you think he's 100% now? How long would it take you to heal from a broken collarbone. Unless you just started watching SEC football this year you know good and damn well that Scott is a good back. Quit flaming.
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Again, deflection of the question. You won't answer, because you'll have to admit that I'm right in either he isn't as good as you want to believe, or his coaching has failed him, or a combination of both.


i answered you... now what do you have to say about your blatant lie? and i am still waiting for you to show me where i said that speed doesnt matter... and for you to show me where i said that CS is as good as Jerome Bettis.??? i am seriously begging you to show me where i said those things.. i will show you where you said i said them if you would like.. i am just asking you to show where i said them.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:24 pm to
11 of 22 games he started, he rushed for less than 70 yards. He had one 112 yd rushing game against Tulane this year, no more over 100 and booked his big games against Appy St, North Tx, Tulane the previous year.
This post was edited on 2/28/10 at 4:26 pm
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Scott wasn't healed enough to participate a month ago at the Senior Bowl what makes you think he's 100% now?


Someone with a valid argument.
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:26 pm to
can you just please show me where i said that speed doesn't matter??? please just look at this post.. then go find where i said that and then post it.... thats all i ask
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:29 pm to
in the meantime.. i guess i will just post this jewel again...

Alahunter-You stated that his time wasn't bad for a RB that weighed 240. It is. It's bad that a RB even weighs this much, but to then have OLinemen show more athletic ability, that's sad. Like I said, some would, in addition to blaming his lack of discipline, blame the coaches for instilling such a poor work ethic. After all, how many times on here in this site, have Lsu fans said that a players results are the reflection of his coaching? It carries through for your team too, right? Fact is, he showed up heavier than he should be, has underperformed what he should have. That is either a reflection of being coached poorly, or you had a bad RB this year

Alahunter- I didn't say a RB. I said CS. And he underperformed. If it's not coaching, and it's not his new ballooned up size, then what do you attribute his poor showing to?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:30 pm to
And to which RB were we discussing when I said A RB? This isn't a court of law. If you couldn't infer how I was talking about, then you're really stupid. As it is, I think you're just splitting hairs because you don't want to answer my single question.
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

So it's your assertion that Charles Scott is as good as Jerome Bettis. Nice.


oh and please show me where i said this... please please please
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

And to which RB were we discussing when I said A RB? This isn't a court of law. If you couldn't infer how I was talking about, then you're really stupid. As it is, I think you're just splitting hairs because you don't want to answer my single question.


you said that it is bad that a running back weighs this much.... not that charles scott does.. there is a big difference and it is very relevant
Posted by sabes que
Member since Jan 2010
10156 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:33 pm to
quote:


will be lucky to get drafted.





quote:


Injury prone





quote:


A product of the coaching he's had





quote:


a soft player with a bad work ethic





quote:


I've stated nothing but facts




Quit being a douche and a dumbass. You've stated your opinon. Scott wasn't healed enough to participate a month ago at the Senior Bowl what makes you think he's 100% now? How long would it take you to heal from a broken collarbone. Unless you just started watching SEC football this year you know good and damn well that Scott is a good back. Quit flaming.



Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90742 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:33 pm to
yes, because we were talking about so many other RB's at the combine before I worded it that way. Again, for the 3rd time, you know I was talking about CS in that statement, as you were the one saying he weighed that much and that it wasn't bad for a RB to run that. Keep on with your victory lap in calling me out for not being superspecific in my statement and not crossing an i.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
86832 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:33 pm to
Hunter you couldn't be more wrong about chuck... that is all
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter