Started By
Message
re: So Ben Tate is faster than McCluster?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:03 pm to Duke
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:03 pm to Duke
quote:
McCluster is shifty and has great football speed. His 40 time isn't surprising. I've seen him get caught from behind numerous times. He's just so exposlive from the word "Go."
agreed. You Ole miss fans are really good posters.
1
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:03 pm to sabes que
I guess my calling your CS a RB is a moral victory for you. Congrats.
Still doesn't change the fact, that he sucked and it was either because he sucks, or his coaching the last 4 yrs made him a soft player with a bad work ethic.
Still doesn't change the fact, that he sucked and it was either because he sucks, or his coaching the last 4 yrs made him a soft player with a bad work ethic.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:04 pm to Alahunter
you didnt say RB you said CS... hahahahahah
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:05 pm to adammwilson
quote:
You Ole miss fans are really good posters.
Nah, we just look better by comparison with all the corndogs and gumps here.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:05 pm to Alahunter
quote:
soft player
so now you are saying a very physical rb is soft now?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:05 pm to sabes que
Andd.. no argument to why he was so bad, or his coaching was. Because there is none.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:06 pm to sabes que
when you were proven wrong on saying that a running back has no business being 240... you tried to retract and say you said scott.. but the beauty of message boards is to go back and look.... you said a running back has no business being that big... then you strait up said you didn't say running back you said CS.. 
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:07 pm to sabes que
You stated that his time wasn't bad for a RB that weighed 240. It is. It's bad that a RB even weighs this much, but to then have OLinemen show more athletic ability, that's sad. Like I said, some would, in addition to blaming his lack of discipline, blame the coaches for instilling such a poor work ethic. After all, how many times on here in this site, have Lsu fans said that a players results are the reflection of his coaching? It carries through for your team too, right? Fact is, he showed up heavier than he should be, has underperformed what he should have. That is either a reflection of being coached poorly, or you had a bad RB this year
I didn't say a RB. I said CS. And he underperformed. If it's not coaching, and it's not his new ballooned up size, then what do you attribute his poor showing to?
i had to post this one more time
I didn't say a RB. I said CS. And he underperformed. If it's not coaching, and it's not his new ballooned up size, then what do you attribute his poor showing to?
i had to post this one more time
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:08 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Says the guy who made a thread bragging about his ex-rb's stats at the combine
Yeah I did, but I didnt say he would/would not get drafted b/c of combine results.
YOu on the other hand,looked at CS's forty time and vertical leap and came to the conclusion he might not get drafted because of it, totally disregarding what he did on the football field. That's crazy and ill informed.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:08 pm to adammwilson
Nope, he was supposed to be first string, and number one RB for Lsu. Touted as the best in the conference, a Heisman potential candidate. You're stating that he's a physical back. Shouldn't a physical back be able to manage more than 60 yds rushing in more than 4 out of 9 games he's played in as a starting RB. And he barely got 60 yds in one of those 4 games.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:09 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
totally disregarding what he did on the football field
Like rush for less than 60 yds in 5 of his 9 games? And rush for over 100 only once? Against Tulane?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:11 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Nope, he was supposed to be first string, and number one RB for Lsu. Touted as the best in the conference, a Heisman potential candidate. You're stating that he's a physical back. Shouldn't a physical back be able to manage more than 60 yds rushing in more than 4 out of 9 games he's played in as a starting RB. And he barely got 60 yds in one of those 4 games.
i don't think anyone hyped him as a possible heisman winner. With no line help?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:12 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Like rush for less than 60 yds in 5 of his 9 games? And rush for over 100 only once? Against Tulane?
what does this have to do with his combine being related to lsu's coaching?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:12 pm to adammwilson
It was on here quite a bit before the season. And wasn't he running behind an All SEC lineman in Ciron Black? Seems that some coaches and many others thought there was some talent on that line. Heck, even Miles stated it was the best Oline he's ever had.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:13 pm to sabes que
I was answering a question. Keep up.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:13 pm to Alahunter
quote:
And wasn't he running behind an All SEC lineman in Ciron Black?
an o.line has 5 guys on it.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:15 pm to adammwilson
No shite sherlock. And Lsu's coach said it was the best he's ever had. I would think and ex-lineman and head coach would know what he's talking about. After all, nobody wants to acknowledge that it's that coach that might be part of the reason Scott is underperforming and did underperform this year.
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:15 pm to adammwilson
so do you have nothing to say about your blatant lie... ?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:16 pm to sabes que
Do you not want to answer why his performance is so bad?
Posted on 2/28/10 at 4:18 pm to Alahunter
do you think glenn coffee was a good RB at alabama?
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News