Started By
Message

re: So Ben Tate is faster than McCluster?

Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by AUEagle225
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2010
2581 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

any nfl team that takes tate be4 dexter would be very foolish imo

please explain......
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:24 pm to
I love how Ben is Top 5 in a ton of categories but isn't even near a Top 5 RB list by Mayock or McShay.
Posted by greenie
Member since Feb 2010
173 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:24 pm to
Dexter is more versital
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

please explain......



dexter is a game changing home run kinda player

tate is not IMO...not implying that tate won't be a very good NFL player, because he will, just think dexter can be used in many different ways, even with his size issue

haven't looked at projections but I think Dexter would be projected higher because of those things
Posted by CFBFAN1121
Abbottabad, Pakistan
Member since Sep 2006
4174 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

dexter is a game changing home run kinda player


IMO, Reggie Bush may have killed that mindset. He was the ultimate 'homerun threat' coming out of college, he's been less than spectacular in the NFL.

Tate has the prototypical NFL RB body. He's fast and strong and much bigger than DM. Tate is more valuable IMO
Posted by rangers911
Member since Jun 2009
5159 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

dexter is a game changing home run kinda player

tate is not IMO...not implying that tate won't be a very good NFL player, because he will, just think dexter can be used in many different ways, even with his size issue

haven't looked at projections but I think Dexter would be projected higher because of those things


Dexter has more raw talent but is pigeon holed by his size. He is not an every down back in the NFL, heck he wasn't one in the SEC. He'll be a hybrid role in the NFL, punt returner, change of pace back but Tate is a workhorse back he's always been that way. I'm not saying who will go higher but that will come down to needs.
Posted by DanMullenIsOurMan
Miss. State - 41 Ole Miss - 27
Member since May 2009
4677 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:31 pm to
thanks.

Has Dixon bench pressed yet?
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
69219 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:32 pm to
225lbs 16 times for Dixon.


Dex pressed 20.
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

prototypical NFL RB body



a dime a dozen dude

quote:

IMO, Reggie Bush may have killed that mindset


then your opinion would be wrong, most teams value a player who can:

return kicks
return punts
run the ball inside & out
catch the ball out of the backfield

all which Dex does at a high level

bring this thread back when Dex is drafter higher


eta: and this is a true unbiased view as I dislike both the Rebs and Beagles equally
This post was edited on 2/28/10 at 2:35 pm
Posted by DanMullenIsOurMan
Miss. State - 41 Ole Miss - 27
Member since May 2009
4677 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:33 pm to
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
92243 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:33 pm to
Tate was also tied for 1st on the broad jump, tied for 1st on bench press, 2nd on vertical jump, and i guess he is faster than McCluster.

Tate.
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Tate was also tied for 1st on the broad jump, tied for 1st on bench press, 2nd on vertical jump, and i guess he is faster than McCluster



oh Lord, does this qualify Auburn for a Combine National Championship now?
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
92243 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:38 pm to
Jealous much?



The guys killin it at the combine.

Get over yourself.
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Jealous much?



The guys killin it at the combine.

Get over yourself.



cm'on man, learn how to take a joke
Posted by DanMullenIsOurMan
Miss. State - 41 Ole Miss - 27
Member since May 2009
4677 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:41 pm to
Dixon > Tate
but....
Tate > McCluster

IMHO
Posted by DeuceisLoose
Mandeville
Member since Sep 2008
2455 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

scott went 4.72 & 4.67 and I'd guess he'll still go 3/4th round, just like Dixon


I'd take Dixon every day of the week over Charles Scott.
Posted by greenie
Member since Feb 2010
173 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

I'd take Dixon every day of the week over Charles Scott.


Me too
Posted by DanMullenIsOurMan
Miss. State - 41 Ole Miss - 27
Member since May 2009
4677 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

I'd take Dixon every day of the week over Charles Scott.


+1
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

I'd take Dixon every day of the week over Charles Scott.


i dont disagree with that but both are 3rd-4th round guys
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 2/28/10 at 2:45 pm to
I'd definitely take Dixon over Tate
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter