Started By
Message
re: Smael Mondon charges DROPPED
Posted on 8/26/24 at 7:34 pm to Smokeyone
Posted on 8/26/24 at 7:34 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
You are so naive. You really believe dude was charged but never interviewed. Unreal
We can only go by what the police report said. You are calling the cop a liar. Pathetic.
Is it an interview if one person asks questions while the other refuses to answer them? Not really. You act just like him. Guilty as charged.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 7:58 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
At the door threatening violence and threatening to re Easter the apartment.
But the door was closed until McCollough reopened it. I mean, an all sec DB is so scared of a drunk guy he had to chase him down the hall and sucker punch him? And i saw no account of the guy threatening violence. Getting belligerent is not the same thing.
quote:
Actions indicate otherwise
What actions? I mean, the drunk clearly wanted it to go further. He got $22,000 and vindicated. I mean, have you ever stayed in a college dorm? Stories of drunks going into the wrong dorm room or knocking on the wrong doors are common.
quote:No they didn't. That's stretching things a whole lot. The staff member being drunk and driving was the biggest contributor.
The biggest difference between McCullough and Carter? Carters actions directly contributed to the deaths of a teammate and a UGA staffer.
McCollough wasn't drunk. he was sober and made his bad decision. He purposely attacked a confused and drunk guy. You act like McCollough did not admit he committed felony assault.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 7:59 pm to djsdawg
quote:
We can only go by what the police report said
You could think and reason this through. I guess if you have no life experience to base that on it could be difficult.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 8:00 pm to BadaBingBadaBoom
quote:
Keep believing that until it’s one of your family members or friends who are killed!
Nobody is excusing the death, but it seems odd for an LSU fan to be lecturing anybody. If you want to talk about negligence of an athletic department we can talk about the LSU AD covering up rapes. It's best to keep out of the conversation unless you have a clean house.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 8:05 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
You could think and reason this through. I
There are 2 options:
1. The attacker refused to answer questions. This is what guilty people often do.
2. The attacker answered the questions, and the cop lied about that is in his report. Just because, Why?
There is zero evidence supporting that nonsensical idea of yours.
The cop would be fired, testimony thrown out, and whole case would be dismissed by the judge. None of that happened.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 8:06 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
But the door was closed until McCollough reopened it. I mean, an all sec DB is so scared of a drunk guy
Obviously not since he followed him…
quote:
What actions? I mean, the drunk clearly wanted it to go further
Did you read any of the testimony? You should.
quote:
No they didn't
The rate of speed was not a factor in your humble opinion? Ok DJ JR. UGA AD was aware of where the vehicle was, they were aware of Carter street racing (prior incidents) they were aware that the AD staff had encouraged its staffers to drink and drive. They created a situation in which this tragedy happened. And then swept it under the rug and attacked anyone that dared report on it.
And the legion of useful idiots that makeup the UGA fanbase cheered them on. Utterly mind blowing how otherwise rational people can just lose their collective minds because of “my team” mentality.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 8:07 pm to djsdawg
Think boy, think. It’s not hard.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 8:12 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Think boy, think. It’s not hard.
You are saying The attacker answered the questions, and the cop lied about that is in his report, but you can’t explain why you think something so unlikely happened.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 8:31 pm to djsdawg
Think boy, it’s not that hard.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 9:03 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Think boy, it’s not that hard.
If it’s not 1 or 2, What is the 3rd option?
Posted on 8/26/24 at 9:06 pm to djsdawg
Think it through. I know it’s hard if you are not used to it.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 9:08 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Think it through.
Think what through? The burden is on you to explain it.
Your coach was a coward to not kick that attacker off the team.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 9:14 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Think what through?
Read the reports and the testimony. Look at the actions taken by all parties involved and think. Think about the outcome and the steps needed to get there.
Posted on 8/26/24 at 9:28 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
Read the reports and the testimony.
I read what is available and posted the exact words that prove my point.
Logically speaking, your take is nonsense. Factually speaking, you have provided nothing. You need to Post the exact parts of the reports and testimony that you want us to see.
All the cop needed to see to arrest the thug was a broken face on a victim and a bloody hand on an attacker.
Posted on 8/27/24 at 5:53 am to Dawg4Life47
I swear I read smeagol..
Posted on 8/27/24 at 6:08 am to djsdawg
Read the reports. That what we know happened, take what we know the possible outcomes could have been, take what outcome we know happened. Take what we know about the people involved. Think.
Posted on 8/27/24 at 6:57 am to Smokeyone
quote:
Obviously not since he followed him…
quote:
until McCollough reopened it.
You must have missed this part of my post. The post wasn't that long, but you didn't bother reading it?
Eta
Unless you are meaning he was scared of the guy because he followed him? I mean, the guy was drunk enough to go into the wrong building and walk into the wrong apartment without realizing it, so it's not like he was a huge threat. I mean, if he knew the guy was not a threat, why attack him?
quote:
Did you read any of the testimony? You should.
But, you argued that charges could not be brought unless someone pressed them. Were charges pressed against McCollough or not. If they were who pressed them? If they were, then your argument that only the litigants could press them.
quote:
The rate of speed was not a factor in your humble opinion?
Of course, but people go fast all the time. However, when someone is drunk it is a much more affecting thing. All you have to do is look at statistics on wrecks. A high percentage of them alcohol is involved. But:
1. Carter did not make them race
2. Carter was not charged
3. McCollough was charged.
You tell us as honestly as you can. Why was Carter not charged with causing the wreck?
This post was edited on 8/27/24 at 7:38 am
Posted on 8/27/24 at 8:47 am to Smokeyone
quote:
My notifications are clear, if you didn’t like the answer then that’s a you issue.
More nonsense from Smokey as usual.
Posted on 8/27/24 at 10:49 am to Smokeyone
quote:
Read the reports.
I already what has been reported. The attacker almost killed a kid. When the cop arrived, the attacker refused to answer the cops questions and then he was arrested. This is what guilty people often do. Terrible look for your couch to not kick him off.
Posted on 8/27/24 at 11:20 am to djsdawg
Read the testimony and think.
Popular
Back to top



1





