Started By
Message
re: SI isn't buying Bama's BS either
Posted on 1/4/13 at 9:47 am to BooHoo Tbow
Posted on 1/4/13 at 9:47 am to BooHoo Tbow
I sure appreciate the daily SECRant post reminder from LSU and Auburn fans about how many more national titles Alabama has than their teams.
The more interesting discussion (since this one is played out) is when Alabama will take the lead over each school in the SEC in poll/BCS era national championships.* Combined.
Right now the count is Alabama 9, rest of SEC 12. Very possible it will be Alabama 10, rest of SEC 12 next Monday. Closing in!
*For purposes of this comparison, we will ignore the pre-poll era titles.
The more interesting discussion (since this one is played out) is when Alabama will take the lead over each school in the SEC in poll/BCS era national championships.* Combined.
Right now the count is Alabama 9, rest of SEC 12. Very possible it will be Alabama 10, rest of SEC 12 next Monday. Closing in!
*For purposes of this comparison, we will ignore the pre-poll era titles.
Posted on 1/4/13 at 9:49 am to PRK
quote:
Since when is "wanky" a word people use?
I work with a half dozen British dudes...I hear this all the time.
Posted on 1/4/13 at 9:56 am to PRK
Thes folks are really WANKY!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since when is "wanky" a word people use?
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Folks should just spin back over past threads and notice how LSU and Auburn fans have become so hostile and bitter toward, not only Alabama, but any and all teams who have ever had a degree of success.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, just Alabama.
FIRST:
wanky
Syllabification: (wan·ky)
Pronunciation: /'wäNGke, 'waNG-/
Definition of wanky
adjective (wankier, wankiest)
British vulgar slang
contemptible, worthless, or stupid: I was determined not to end up as some Nigel doing wanky beer ads
Check out the Auburn and LSU threads. Hell, I could care less, but it's obvious.
Posted on 1/4/13 at 10:25 am to WDE24
quote:
Ohhh, this thread again. I can't wait. USMC is going to start editing wiki pages again to use in his arguments.
That wasn't me, and someone changed it back.
Posted on 1/4/13 at 10:31 am to JaboStokes
quote:
We have so many NC we can't count them all. We have no problem counting yours.
Yeah I almost forgot its really hard for Bama fans to count to ten or more even if they can use their fingers or toes
Posted on 1/4/13 at 10:33 am to BooHoo Tbow
quote:
@Andy_Staples Going back over this story: LINK Tide title claim would actually seem MORE legit at 15 (add 1966 and 1977, drop 1941).
Posted on 1/4/13 at 10:54 am to Bellabama
quote:So Staples trolls the football world and then turns around and says Bama could legitimately claim 15 titles.
@Andy_Staples Going back over this story: LINK Tide title claim would actually seem MORE legit at 15 (add 1966 and 1977, drop 1941).
Staples Big BOOM!
Popular
Back to top


0





