Started By
Message
re: SEC Teams with realistic expectations to win their division(s).
Posted on 9/27/18 at 6:55 am to jawjaTiger
Posted on 9/27/18 at 6:55 am to jawjaTiger
Why do you have A&M out with only 1 SEC loss but Auburn and State still in with theirs? Oh I get it, you automatically assume Alabama wins out but for each individual hypo. And that's what you call realistic? You have far too many teams for this to be realistic expectations.
Realistic would be:
West:
Alabama favored; LSU certainly in the hunt; Auburn on the fringe.
East:
Georgia favored; Kentucky in the hunt; Florida on the fringe.
Realistic would be:
West:
Alabama favored; LSU certainly in the hunt; Auburn on the fringe.
East:
Georgia favored; Kentucky in the hunt; Florida on the fringe.
This post was edited on 9/27/18 at 6:56 am
Posted on 9/27/18 at 6:56 am to jawjaTiger
I’ve said to people IRL. Mizzou’s not going to win a championship, but they’re gonna muck it up for someone who thinks they are.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 7:40 am to jawjaTiger
quote:
West:
Alabama
LSU
Auburn
Miss State
Ole Miss
quote:
Texas A&M - Out
Que?
Posted on 9/27/18 at 7:41 am to Nguyening
Whoops, i replied before I read more than OP. This guy, haha.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 8:30 am to jawjaTiger
How is A&M mathematically eliminated?
If A&M wins out and LSU beats Alabama but loses to A&M, all 3 teams are 7-1.
If A&M wins out and LSU beats Alabama but loses to A&M, all 3 teams are 7-1.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 8:35 am to jawjaTiger
quote:
All teams that are not OUT can win their division at this point in time mathematically.

Posted on 9/27/18 at 8:39 am to jawjaTiger
It's extremely unlikely that Bama loses 2, so I think we can confidently remove any team that has lost to Bama or 2 other SEC teams from the realistic expectations list in the West.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 8:40 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
If A&M wins out and LSU beats Alabama but loses to A&M, all 3 teams are 7-1.
LSU and Bama would be ranked higher.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 8:46 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
LSU and Bama would be ranked higher.
Ranking isn't part of the three team tie breaking procedure.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 8:51 am to jawjaTiger
Imagine a scenario where Kentucky only loses to Georgia, Georgia loses to LSU, and LSU only loses to
Bama, who also beats Georgia in the sec championship game.
Bama goes to the playoffs obviously, and then you have Kentucky and LSU with one loss only, to teams that were highly ranked at the time even though neither got a chance to play in the sec championship game.
Bama, who also beats Georgia in the sec championship game.
Bama goes to the playoffs obviously, and then you have Kentucky and LSU with one loss only, to teams that were highly ranked at the time even though neither got a chance to play in the sec championship game.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 8:55 am to pvilleguru
quote:
Ranking isn't part of the three team tie breaking procedure.
You're right. Did that change?
Posted on 9/27/18 at 8:56 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
You're right. Did that change?
No.
Popular
Back to top

0







