Started By
Message
re: SEC standings last 3,5, and 10 years...
Posted on 7/21/11 at 11:08 pm to DaleDenton
Posted on 7/21/11 at 11:08 pm to DaleDenton
I've never seen a standings format where 22-18 is listed over 22-13.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 11:09 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
I've never seen a standings format where 22-18 is listed over 22-13.
Yes you have, you've been bitching about it for the past hour.
Part of vacating games. Deal with it.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 11:10 pm to DaleDenton
It's not part of anything but the imaginary world that dumbass pigs live in.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 11:12 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
imaginary world
Is this where vacated games in the record books are considered to be wins and such vacated games are not included in percentages when finding wins per games played?
I think so.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 11:15 pm to DaleDenton
You've owned him here and he knows it. At the very least he is thinking about it (well, seething). Well done.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 11:30 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
Arkansas 22-18
Alabama 22-13
Wrong. Even with the vacated wins, Arkansas has more losses.
Posted on 7/21/11 at 11:37 pm to jatebe
quote:
Even with the vacated wins, Arkansas has the same winning percentage.
FIFY.
NCAA has ruled the tie-breaker in favor of Arkansas on this one.
Hell, 0U had a booster directly pay players. They were able to get their vacations over-turned.
Don't cheat, but if you do, do not do it multiple times as one day it will effect your circle jerk thread on the SECr.
Posted on 7/22/11 at 2:31 am to Sao
No one has been owned in this thread. Someone just loves to talk shite, and argue an asinine point into the ground.
Popular
Back to top

1




