Started By
Message
2
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:55 pm to I-59 Tiger
quote:
So 74-72 is a bigger win than 50-7?
Which game did the losing head coach receive a gatorade bath?
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:56 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
We pretty much tripled your score over a 5 year period
We beat you by more than 7x what you scored in one season.
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:58 pm to TeLeFaWx
LSU's did. So you are saying 74-72 is a bigger win than 50-7?
Posted on 4/7/20 at 3:59 pm to I-59 Tiger
quote:
LSU's did.
Hahaha, wait you're saying your head coach got a gatorade bath and LOST the game???
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:00 pm to TeLeFaWx
evidently you think a two point win is bigger than a 43 point win.
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:04 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
So Bama must have dominated them, right ? Why don’t you tell us how Alabama did against the “ joke “ conference ? We will wait .
*Somewhere in the distance a lone wolf howls
11-13. 0-6 v. Texas. 9-2 in games since 1970. All but one of the losses were prior to 1974. Saying the SWC was a great conference is about like saying Minnesota and Army are great football programs. By the time it fell apart in 1996, only Texas, A&M, TTU, and Arkansas were actually wanted by another conference. The Texas legislature forced Baylor into the deal. Imagine if a conference imploded today and only half its teams could find a power 5 conference to take it. Would we call that a great conference? I'd call it a joke.
BY DECADE
W L T Win % PFPG PAPG
1980's 4 1 0 80.0 24.6 8.6
1970's 5 1 0 83.3 37.3 5.3
1960's 1 2 1 37.5 11.5 11.8
1950's 0 6 0 0.0 4.2 23.3
1940's 1 1 0 50.0 18.0 24.0
1930's 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1920's 0 1 0 0.0 10.0 19.0
1910's 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 20.0
This post was edited on 4/7/20 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:06 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
worst five year period in LSU history to crow about
You got pounded on, got upset and ran away from the series. Thats what happened
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:08 pm to MillerLiteTime
The Southwest Conference as a whole was a very,very good football league until the late 1980's. Sure there were some dog years,but every league had those as well. In fact from top to bottom the SWC may have had the best league in the 1970's.
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:08 pm to Murph4HOF
quote:
Melt, bitch
Sweet lord.
Is this the retort for all new posters on this forum, when you cannot think of a thing to add of substance?
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:25 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
Don't lie. You know those numbers are not accurate.
Feel free to check my math. I’ll wait for your corrections.
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:27 pm to MillerLiteTime
quote:
11-13.
quote:
Would we call that a great conference? I'd call it a joke.
Got it. Alabama was 11-13 against the joke conference.
Keep us posted on your other clutch opinions.
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:32 pm to texag7
quote:
You got pounded on, got upset and ran away from the series. Thats what happened
Actually, tamu requested that the series be cancelled because it was joining the Big12 in 1996 and it’s league schedule wouldn’t accommodate the annual matchup with LSU.
LSU agreed and waived its right to the cancellation fees called for in the contract.
You’re probably thinking of the time time tamu left the Big12 because Daddy Texas embarrassed it in every sport for a century. The ags paid tens of millions in buyout money to the Big12 conference to stop the annual beatings.
Ouch!
As It Tries to Bolt the Big 12, The Joke's On Texas A&M (Again)
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:34 pm to I-59 Tiger
quote:
The Southwest Conference as a whole was a very,very good football league until the late 1980's. Sure there were some dog years,but every league had those as well. In fact from top to bottom the SWC may have had the best league in the 1970's.
So it was such a good league that only a decade after it was great, it imploded, out-casting half its teams to CUSA? The SWC past the 1950's was about as good as the old Big East. It was a one state league known for dominance by one team and a bunch of others trying to play catch-up by cheating at a rate so high that it shocked people even by 1980's cheating standards. The SWC had horrible attendance, fan support, facilities, basically everything you would use to determine the health of a league. None of its teams outside of Texas, A&M, and Arkansas had any national relevance beyond occasional successful runs of a few years by the smaller teams that would later be taken down by obvious cheating scandals.
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:35 pm to texag7
quote:
You got pounded on, got upset and ran away from the series. Thats what happened
Why is Aggie so bad vs LSU these days?
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:42 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Got it. Alabama was 11-13 against the joke conference.
Keep us posted on your other clutch opinions.
Put it in context. Nearly all of the losses were prior to the 70s. Half the losses were to Texas (one of the few schools that were not a joke in the SWC). I'll be the first to admit that for whatever reason, very old school pre-1970's Alabama was not good against the SWC or especially against Texas.
Also, if (by your logic) SWC > Alabama automatically means the SWC was great, then shouldn't LSU > SWC automatically mean that the SWC is trash given that LSU was very average as a whole while the SWC existed?
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:49 pm to MillerLiteTime
K. Keep us posted.
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:49 pm to Bankshot
quote:
One of our games against Texas Tech was considered an SEC game years ago.
Think that happened twice with Ole Miss and pre-SEC Arkansas.
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:49 pm to I-59 Tiger
quote:
So 74-72 is a bigger win than 50-7?
Obviously.
74-72:
Tamu put that score on commemorative cups, on the inside of their bowl rings, above its student section when LSU men’s BB visited college station, and their coach has an oil painting of a play from the game hanging in his office.
50-7:
A footnote score against one of the few non-ranked teams LSU played that year. Lumped in with Arkansas, Ole Miss, Vandy, and Utah State.
Posted on 4/7/20 at 4:55 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Lsupimp
So I've tried to engage you in a discussion relevant to the thread topic you posted and yet all you have been able to do is make every response revert to some troll of Alabama. Outside of your initial post you haven't responded with any numbers or even opinions; purely trolls of Alabama simply because of the logo next to my name. Keep up the good fight buddy.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News