Started By
Message
re: Sanders officially decommits.....
Posted on 9/30/09 at 5:52 pm to Jhag
Posted on 9/30/09 at 5:52 pm to Jhag
quote:
Just keep bumping up in those recruiting rankings
Per rivals...
2010
AU is 23rd. Chizik.
2009
Au was 19th. Chizik.
2008
Au was 20th. CTT
2007
Au was 7th. CTT
2006
Au was 10th. CTT
2005
Au was 13th. CTT
Boogs I apologize when I said that Chizik and co were basically doing the same thing CTT did, this is not correct. Chizik and co have a ways to go just to do as well as CTT.
I know you will consider these fact flames and will come back with a personal attack but WTFever.
2
Posted on 9/30/09 at 5:53 pm to thebearisdead
quote:
It's way over your head...
now that is one awesome, awesome comeback.
Posted on 9/30/09 at 5:54 pm to WhoLeoJones
Congrats WhoLeo... Anything else?
Posted on 9/30/09 at 5:55 pm to thebearisdead
quote:
now that is one awesome, awesome comeback.
Thanks
Posted on 9/30/09 at 5:56 pm to WhoLeoJones
The 2010 class isn't complete yet brah.
And the circumstances of the 2009 class makes the fact that he pulled in a top 15 class (per Scout IIRC) very impressive to me.
ETA: I'll also add that Recruiting Rankings aren't good as a statsheet in that form. Florida was ranked like #23 last year and their class was one of the best in the nation.
And the circumstances of the 2009 class makes the fact that he pulled in a top 15 class (per Scout IIRC) very impressive to me.
ETA: I'll also add that Recruiting Rankings aren't good as a statsheet in that form. Florida was ranked like #23 last year and their class was one of the best in the nation.
This post was edited on 9/30/09 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 9/30/09 at 5:57 pm to Ross
quote:
And the circumstances of the 2009 class makes the fact that he pulled in a top 15 class (per Scout IIRC) very impressive to me.
Check out the enrolled rankings. Finishing outside the top 25 is impressive. Excellent!
quote:
The 2010 class isn't complete yet brah.
No shite. You want me to give you extra points based on kids AU gets officals from or something? This is all we have to go off of right now.
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:00 pm to WhoLeoJones
quote:
No shite. You want me to give you extra points based on kids AU gets officals from or something? This is all we have to go off of right now.
That's exactly what I want you to do. Of course.
Stop being a dipshit. Those rankings aren't worth jack right now and won't be until NSD and subsequent weeks. Even then they will still be flawed, and will have to combined with other factors and recruiting services and include the much more important Average Star Rankings before you even want to begin using that shite in an argument.
This post was edited on 9/30/09 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:02 pm to WhoLeoJones
quote:
Check out the enrolled rankings. Finishing outside the top 25 is impressive. Excellent!
I'm looking at Scout's main page for Team Recruiting Rankings and noticed Auburn slipped to #16 for last year. Well, can't say we're top 15 anymore but once again I digress, given the circumstances that class was impressive to real in.
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:03 pm to Sofa King Crimson
Gerald West
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:04 pm to rangers911
quote:
You oversigned to win it one year the other only one site had Bama in the lead the others had ND in the lead. No doubt Bama had some good classes though.
You could sign 1,000 players, but they're still only going to count your top 20 players in the point system.
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:07 pm to Ross
quote:
Stop being a dipshit. Those rankings aren't worth jack right now and won't be until NSD and subsequent weeks. Even then they will still be flawed, and will have to combined with other factors and recruiting services and include the much more important Average Star Rankings before you even want to begin using that shite in an argument.
Will it matter if you finish about 6th in the SEC? Who do you think you will pass, UGA, LSU, UA, UTK? You do know all those schools still have players they will sign right.
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:09 pm to WhoLeoJones
quote:
Will it matter if you finish about 6th in the SEC? Who do you think you will pass, UGA, LSU, UA, UTK? You do know all those schools still have players they will sign right.
I figured they'd all cease their recruiting activities immediately.
But seriously; in my opinion, if the average star ranking is similiar and both schools pull in top ten classes, there is little difference between the quality of those classes (except some years when there is a gap between 1-3 and the rest). That's how I feel about where we end up in the recruiting rankings.
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:09 pm to Ross
quote:
I'm looking at Scout's main page for Team Recruiting Rankings and noticed Auburn slipped to #16 for last year. Well, can't say we're top 15 anymore but once again I digress, given the circumstances that class was impressive to real in.
Yes, very impressive. Of course you would use scout.
Try these.
LINK
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:10 pm to WhoLeoJones
quote:
Yes, very impressive. Of course you would use scout.
What, pray tell, is wrong with Scout other than its interface is less appealing than that of Rivals?
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:11 pm to WhoLeoJones
And in those rankings, we are #23. What happened to your claim of us being outside the top 25?
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:12 pm to Ross
quote:
What, pray tell, is wrong with Scout other than its interface is less appealing than that of Rivals?
Nothing especially if you are an AU fan because the AU rivals site is considered garbage and my boog friends consider ITAT light years better but the scout national info is lacking compared to rivals and most see espn passing them in the next couple of years. Actually rivals better watch out for espn also.
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:13 pm to Ross
quote:
Sanders officially decommits.....
And in those rankings, we are #23. What happened to your claim of us being outside the top 25
My bad you only feel out of the top 20. Congrats.
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:15 pm to WhoLeoJones
quote:
Nothing especially if you are an AU fan because the AU rivals site is considered garbage and my boog friends consider ITAT light years better but the scout national info is lacking compared to rivals and most see espn passing them in the next couple of years. Actually rivals better watch out for espn also.
ITAT's boards, while lightyears ahead of the shitfest called The Bunker, still suck.
According to whom is Scout's information inferior to Rivals? I've heard claims that point to the exact opposite but on the whole I consider them for the most part equal.
I will say that ESPN's recruiting service is going to catch strong wind very soon.
This post was edited on 9/30/09 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:15 pm to WhoLeoJones
quote:
My bad you only feel out of the top 20. Congrats.
No need for sarcasm, just pointing out inconsistencies in your posts with the stats you provide.
This post was edited on 9/30/09 at 6:17 pm
Posted on 9/30/09 at 6:18 pm to Ross
quote:
According to whom is Scout's information inferior to Rivals? I've heard claims that point to the exact opposite but on the whole I consider them for the most part equal.
These guys to start with LINK inspite of a long running fued with the rivals national board scout is not even considered important enough to warrant a spin off board.
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News