Started By
Message
re: Ryan Day still whining over "non-targeting" aka “Displaced Buckeye Sore Butthole thread”
Posted on 2/4/23 at 8:03 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 2/4/23 at 8:03 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:I didn't say that I'm exclusively directing my pity there. I pity you, especially, even more than myself. I'm a sinner, but I'm saved by the grace of God.
Out of the constant drivel you post, finally, something useful
You are a sinner who won't even recognize that he is, or that he owes anything to his creator. You are a person to be pitied the most, because you are on the road to eternal damnation.
That aside, you can't even carry on a fruitful conversation about sports, much less anything of actual substance. There are people just as lost as you that at least recognize the need for rational thinking and putting forth actual arguments when having a discussion where there are differences of opinions or beliefs about truth claims. As I said previously, you ask for everything and contribute nothing.
3
Posted on 2/5/23 at 11:55 am to Knowshon5Dolla
quote:
I asked you. Directly.
Good for you.
quote:
30 pages and counting.
And the majority are from Georgia fans. It's definitely been a wonderful melt. Y’all are just confused on the source.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 11:56 am to FooManChoo
quote:
I didn't say that I'm exclusively directing my pity there. I pity you, especially, even more than myself.
Don't care. That's your issue.
At least you're half right, I suppose.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 1:04 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
you can't even carry on a fruitful conversation about sports, much less anything of actual substance.
The sad truth
Posted on 2/5/23 at 2:17 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
don't have to "come up with" anything.
If you want to rule changed, you need to articulate what exactly you want it to be changed to.
Buck fans, not just you, can’t do that. Score remains 42-41.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 3:56 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
at least recognize the need for rational thinking and putting forth actual arguments when having a discussion where there are differences of opinions or beliefs about truth claims.
Well said
Again
Posted on 2/5/23 at 5:30 pm to djsdawg
quote:
If you want to rule changed
The rule being changed every year is half the problem. I'd settle for targeting to be called consistently.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 5:34 pm to Long Dawg
I’ve seen the replay several times. It was a hard hit but it wasn’t targeting. Injuries happen and it’s unfortunate that he was knocked out of the game but that’s football.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 5:39 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
31 pages of Cat Nip for Displaced Buckeye
Posted on 2/5/23 at 6:31 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
The rule being changed every year is half the problem
How so? It’s good that they try to improve upon flawed rules.
As you said…..
quote:
They'll evaluate and update as necessary. This hit will be included in that, whether you like it or not.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 8:30 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I'd settle for targeting to be called consistently.
IOW, you are arguing for Hi def, slow mo, multiple angles Replay.
Finally.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 8:53 pm to Long Dawg
quote:
31 pages
Yep. Y’all can't help yourselves.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 9:14 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
DisplacedBuckeye
31 pages and counting, I need someone to look up the record for the longest melt because he is getting close.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 9:18 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Yep. Y’all can't help yourselves.
Just so impressed with your inability to carry on a fruitful conversation about sports.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 9:20 pm to djsdawg
I don't know if anybody has brought this up. But the officials said it wasn't targeting, so I think the mature thing to do is just accept the call as correct and move on.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 9:23 pm to FatDawg
quote:
I don't know if anybody has brought this up. But the officials said it wasn't targeting, so I think the mature thing to do is just accept the call as correct and move on.
The only thing they messed up on the play was not pushing OSU back to the 12 yard line.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 9:45 pm to FatDawg
Y'all could also accept that it was a subjective call that went your way, and not everyone agrees with it.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 9:53 pm to Long Dawg
42-41 and in the record books.
This post was edited on 2/5/23 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 2/5/23 at 9:56 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
and not everyone agrees with it.
Refs who lack bias, understand the rule, and had access to Hi def, slow mo, multiple angles Replay agree with the rule.
Posted on 2/5/23 at 10:25 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:FIFY
Y'all could also accept that it was the right call according to the rules and the video evidence and not every buckeye fan agrees with it.
This post was edited on 2/5/23 at 10:26 pm
Page 31 of 38
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News