Started By
Message
re: Ryan Day still whining over "non-targeting" aka “Displaced Buckeye Sore Butthole thread”
Posted on 2/3/23 at 1:51 pm to djsdawg
Posted on 2/3/23 at 1:51 pm to djsdawg
quote:
You always say something along the lines of “I don’t have to” when asked to go into details about the big stuff, and here you essentially do it again.
If you've demonstrated on the small stuff that you're not willing to admit when you're wrong, I'm not wasting my time. I'd rather be entertained than spend time trying to argue with someone who can't do that.
2
Posted on 2/3/23 at 1:51 pm to djsdawg
There was no forcible contact to the head and neck. So there’s no targeting.
Posted on 2/3/23 at 1:51 pm to djsdawg
quote:
They do
K.
Posted on 2/3/23 at 1:52 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
The personal foul would be enforced. But there wasn’t one.
This post was edited on 2/3/23 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 2/3/23 at 1:54 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
because you refused to accept a very simple reality.
I accept 42-41.
I accept my back-to-back national championship t-shirt.
And hat.
It's reality.
I accept it all.
Posted on 2/3/23 at 1:55 pm to JackTraven
quote:
OSU is the only team in the CFP era to blow a 14 point lead in the fourth. Teeeheeeheeee
This is probably why day refuses to accept what he has been told over and over about that play. It’s better for his fans to focus on the refs rather than his coaching choke job
Posted on 2/3/23 at 1:56 pm to Knowshon5Dolla
quote:
back-to-back national championship t-shirt.
And hat.
This doesn't surprise me.
Posted on 2/3/23 at 2:04 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
you've demonstrated on the small stuff th
Such as?
Posted on 2/3/23 at 2:24 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Nope. I just recommended that you provide some information on a forum I assumed you posted on.
Why would you assume I post on there? quote:
Circle jerks aren't my thing. Arguing with you fine people is much more engaging.
Well, it's pretty boring for us:
You: We shoulda won!
Us: Why?
You Becuz it was targeting!
Us: Not according to the rules.
You:Then it was unnecessary roughness!
Us: How so? In what way was it unnecessary roughness?
You: *Crickets*
quote:
An observation like...."The sky is blue!"
Well...thanks for the observation?
quote:No. But your observations have been about as enlightening.
Somehow, I doubt folks would argue with me about that, too.
quote:
Ohio State was the conference winner.
No. You were not. The conference rules stated that the conference winner had to play a minimum number of conference games. Ohio State did not. So, the BIG 10 changed the rules so you could make the playoffs instead of Indiana.
Does Ohio State and their fans always want to make it up as you go? Rules are there for a reason. You can't just ignore them when they don't suit you...unless you are the darling of the Big 10.
quote:They were updated after the season was played?
The rules were updated because they wouldn't make teams that ducked us take a forfeit, which is what should've happened.
Crap dude. I guess if you can't win by the current rules you can just change them after the fact. Maybe your coach should try that? Maybe he could just get the targeting rule changed and rewrite history?
Posted on 2/3/23 at 2:28 pm to Hback
quote:
Holy crap man, you make Irons Puppet look like a genius!
FIFY
Posted on 2/3/23 at 2:32 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Why would you assume I post on there?
Same reason y'all assume I post in Ohio State forums.
quote:
You: We shoulda won!
Us: Why?
You Becuz it was targeting!
Wrong.
quote:
So, the BIG 10 changed the rules
Guess you don't know what this means.
Posted on 2/3/23 at 2:35 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
DisplacedBuckeye
23 pages and counting, this melt just keeps getting better!!!
Posted on 2/3/23 at 2:42 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
You Becuz it was targeting! Us: Not according to the rules. You:Then it was unnecessary roughness! Us: How so? In what way was it unnecessary roughness? You: *Crickets*
Exactly. He is the cricket master
Posted on 2/3/23 at 2:51 pm to djsdawg
What’s amusing is I posted a clear, slow motion view of the MH play and he won’t address that specific video. It’s easily the best view of what happened. It’s really not even disputable what occurred. It’s clear. There was no forcible contact to head and neck. He was concussed be he either 1. Hit the ground or 2. Experiences a whiplash effect from the jarring hit. If the ball were thrown out of the end zone and uncatchable then he’d have a point for a non targeting personal foul. His emotions won’t allow him to come to grips with it. Not even clear video evidence convinces him.
Posted on 2/3/23 at 2:53 pm to CasualFan12
quote:
What’s amusing is I posted a clear, slow motion view of the MH play and he won’t address that specific video
This is all he had:
“I don’t have to”
“It’s subjective!”
Posted on 2/3/23 at 2:56 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
Holy crap man, you make Irons Puppet look like a genius!
Posted on 2/3/23 at 2:58 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Same reason y'all assume I post in Ohio State forums.
I dont assume that. I just wonder why you choose and SEC forum instead of a BIG 10/Ohio State forum. But i think we all know why.
quote:
Wrong.
Are you saying you didn't claim it was targeting then changed to Unnecessary Roughness?
Are you also saying i have not asked you several times to explain how it was unnecessary roughness and you have not done so yet?
quote:
So, the BIG 10 changed the rules
Guess you don't know what this means.
The conference changed its six-game minimum requirement for teams to qualify for the championship game in Indianapolis on December 19 after a Wednesday meeting of athletic directors, according to several reports. The deal is agreed to and is expected to be made official later today. As a result, Northwestern will face No. 4 Ohio State in the title game.
ETA
Other headlines on the subject:
Ohio St. into Big Ten finale after rule adjustment
Big Ten changes rule, allows Ohio State into conference title game
Big Ten eliminates six-game minimum, advances Ohio State to conference title game against Northwestern
Big Ten changes rule, bumps Indiana football out of conference championship game
Or maybe you don't know what it means?
Bunch whiners.
This post was edited on 2/3/23 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 2/3/23 at 3:04 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Exactly. He is the cricket master
He can't back up anything he says/claims.
Posted on 2/3/23 at 3:09 pm to CasualFan12
quote:
What’s amusing is I posted a clear, slow motion view of the MH play and he won’t address that specific video.
So did I. Does your video have something new?
Posted on 2/3/23 at 3:09 pm to DawgsLife
Page 23 of 38
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News