Started By
Message
re: Rushing vs ranked teams
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:03 pm to easy money
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:03 pm to easy money
Yes, worth noting that we have two common opponents coming up in MSU and Auburn. LF7 ran all over Auburn, and I suspect Henry will as well (although probably more like 180 yards instead of LF7's 228.). I also suspect Henry gets at least 150 vs MSU.
So we'll see and the stats will even out a bit, but eventually they'll be in LF7s favor. Arkansas and Ole Miss don't have the most stout run defense, and Henry struggled with Arkansas.
So we'll see and the stats will even out a bit, but eventually they'll be in LF7s favor. Arkansas and Ole Miss don't have the most stout run defense, and Henry struggled with Arkansas.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:04 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
But why are you guys looking at ranked teams? Look at the rushing defenses each has faced.
LF went against the uf defense and had 180 yards at 5.8 ypc.
Henry against Ole miss was 127 5.5 ypc.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:05 pm to easy money
quote:
When you put up the SEC stats, it's about as even as it gets. We will see if that continues.
We're talking about 6.5 ypc vs 5.5 ypc in SEC play. That's not even at all.. LF7 has more total rushing yards and a higher ypc despite having a 30 yard game AND playing in one less game AND having 23 less carries on the season.
LF7 is 200 yards behind Henry in SEC play on 60 less carries
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:06 pm to Rickdaddy4188
I thought LSU had a pretty awesome defense. Not as good as Ole Miss?
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:07 pm to whiskeyjohn
quote:
Henry has played better against stiffer competition thus f
What stiff competition? Bama has played 1 sec team with less than 3 losses.
Lsu has played 3 sec teams with less than 3 losses.
LF has played 1 less game
And still has
More rushing yards
more rushing yards per game
Higher ypc #
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:07 pm to MykTide
quote:
I thought LSU had a pretty awesome defense. Not as good as Ole Miss?
there's a reason Henry got 25% of his yards in the final 3 minutes.. they were exhausted and on the field for 40 minutes
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:07 pm to MykTide
Henry would rush for - yardage behind LSU online against Bama last Saturday.
The stat of 31 yards on 19 carries while being contacted behind the line of scrimmage on 13 attempts against 17 5 star Bama defenders deserves the heisman
The stat of 31 yards on 19 carries while being contacted behind the line of scrimmage on 13 attempts against 17 5 star Bama defenders deserves the heisman
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:09 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
quote:
But why are you guys looking at ranked teams? Look at the rushing defenses each has faced.
LF went against the uf defense and had 180 yards at 5.8 ypc.
Henry against Ole miss was 127 5.5 ypc.
Henry had 147 yds 3 TDs and avg. 11.3 YPC vs Wisconsin's 6th ranked rushing defense. UF's is 19th ranked.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:10 pm to Alahunter
This proves it. DH210 is better than LF31.
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:10 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
Henry had 147 yds 3 TDs and avg. 11.3 YPC vs Wisconsin's 6th ranked rushing defense. UF's is 19th ranked.
Akron has the #5 rushing defense in the country but I'm sure SEC teams would struggle to rush against them
SDSU is the #10.. man, I'm glad LSU doesn't play them
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 8:11 pm
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:10 pm to MykTide
quote:
thought LSU had a pretty awesome defense. Not as good as Ole Miss?
Not against the run.ole miss' Opponents yard per carry number is lower than lsu's.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:11 pm to bmy
average rank of rushing defenses faced, going into the game last weekend:
DH faced 50.1 ranked
LF faced 77.7 ranked
DH faced 50.1 ranked
LF faced 77.7 ranked
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:12 pm to bmy
quote:
Akron has the #5 rushing defense in the country but I'm sure SEC teams would struggle to rush against them
I was comparing UF and Wisconsin's rushing defenses. Both P5 teams. Akron is a MAC team. Why are you using non-P5 teams?
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:12 pm to Alahunter
quote:
average rank of rushing defenses faced, going into the game last weekend:
DH faced 50.1 ranked
LF faced 77.7 ranked
Who the frick cares if teams like SDSU or Akron are ranked in the top-10 rushing defense?
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:13 pm to Alahunter
Dude no matter what you try to do, nobody is going to change their opinion in college football about fournette vs. Henry....
They aren't even in the same hemisphere of backs.....its size vs total package.....
Fournette breaks 6-10 of those runs Henry got gobbled up from behind
They aren't even in the same hemisphere of backs.....its size vs total package.....
Fournette breaks 6-10 of those runs Henry got gobbled up from behind
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:14 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
I was comparing UF and Wisconsin's rushing defenses. Both P5 teams. Akron is a MAC team. Why are you using non-P5 teams?
because they're still listed in the "total rankings". i'm making the point that it's retarded to say "well they were up against a top-10 rushing defense" when the top 10 includes teams like SDSU and akron.
stats from conference play are superior in every single way.
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:16 pm to bmy
quote:
stats from conference play are superior in every single way.
Au and SC ranked 101 and 102 in rush defense going into the game.
Ole Miss and Arky ranked 18 and 25 in rush defense going into the game.
Henry still has as many TD's and more ypg.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:17 pm to Alahunter
Wow pretty damning statistics
Henry is far superior in conference and in big games
Henry is far superior in conference and in big games
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:17 pm to rmnldr
Lets see.....hmmmmmmmmmmm, 38 x 1.6 = 60.8

Popular
Back to top



0







