Started By
Message
re: Rematch??
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:58 pm to Bayou Bandit51
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:58 pm to Bayou Bandit51
Fair or not fair and what people do or do not want is irrelevant with the current system.
This is pretty simple. If Stanford and Okie Lite lose (something I think is very possible, maybe even likely), Bama and LSU will end up #1 and #2 again in the BCS rankings and there will be a rematch(assuming bama wins out).
In fact if I had to bet on who ends up the year at #2, I think bama is more likely than anyone else since I think there is a good chance Stanford loses to Oregon and Okie Lite loses to the Sooners.
Don't like it, but that is my opinion.
This is pretty simple. If Stanford and Okie Lite lose (something I think is very possible, maybe even likely), Bama and LSU will end up #1 and #2 again in the BCS rankings and there will be a rematch(assuming bama wins out).
In fact if I had to bet on who ends up the year at #2, I think bama is more likely than anyone else since I think there is a good chance Stanford loses to Oregon and Okie Lite loses to the Sooners.
Don't like it, but that is my opinion.
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 5:00 pm
0
Posted on 11/6/11 at 5:07 pm to LaBornNRaised
quote:
I hate that argument... The BCSNCG is for the 2 best teams in the nation. You tell me who is better that LSU and Bama? It should be the 2 best teams/thread
Its called the real world. You could have this arguement every year, and there would be 2 teams from the SEC that should be there, if we are all honest with ourselves. Its about money and fairness. Bama had there chance to be in the discussion, but will need lots of help to pass LSU for that berth.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News