Started By
Message
re: Referee complaint, but not LSU related; The Georgia-Missouri game
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:12 am to AwgustaDawg
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:12 am to AwgustaDawg
They missed an obvious targeting late in the 3rd too.
0
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:15 am to AwgustaDawg
Truth.
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:19 am to djsdawg
The call that gave Schrader a first down when he went out of bounds was the most significant from my perspective.
Kirby called a time out to have it reviewed and they ignored the view that showed that he was a half yard short on 4th down.
But Georgia held the line anyway.
Kirby called a time out to have it reviewed and they ignored the view that showed that he was a half yard short on 4th down.
But Georgia held the line anyway.
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:20 am to AwgustaDawg
Truth.
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:23 am to LC412000
It was a missed call
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:24 am to MizzouTrue
What about the missed face mask that benefited mizzou? We just gonna focus on only calls that benefits UGA?
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:27 am to LC412000
Mizzou got bad calls, so did we. They benefitted more ultimately by being allowed to hold all game long on offensive line. There were some blatant holds that should have been called on a couple of their chunk pass plays.
Posted on 11/5/23 at 10:29 am to Fats
This there were a few in the first half you could see their tackles hooking UGA DE on the broadcast.
Officiating was poor and both sides benefited from calls and no calls
Officiating was poor and both sides benefited from calls and no calls
Posted on 11/5/23 at 11:03 am to Sweepthleg
The no. Holding calls were absolutely egregious.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News