Started By
Message
re: Rank the SEC teams in terms of overall importance to the conference
Posted on 5/3/14 at 9:57 pm to roguetiger15
Posted on 5/3/14 at 9:57 pm to roguetiger15
They have us in their fight song too, genius. That's how rivalries work.
This post was edited on 5/3/14 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 5/3/14 at 9:58 pm to CoffeeAg
quote:
Yes, the big 12 is now a weak conference. That tends to happen when your 4 largest members leave all at once to get away from a single program.
Baylor won the conference last year, this shows u how shity this conference is right now
Posted on 5/3/14 at 9:58 pm to roguetiger15
So now you're trolling too? Alright I'm out.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:00 pm to CoffeeAg
quote:
It's not about the wins. It's about the exposure. Its about recruiting and national perception. It's about momentum.
Which describes Texass, not aTm.
aTm has won 19 games the last two seasons. Texas has been down, yet won 17. Two games less than a program you're trying to tell me now "owns" the state.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:02 pm to CoffeeAg
Im not trolling. Everyone knows Jff is 100% the reason for your schools "momentum". He's gone now. He had to put up over 40 points most games to win bc your defense was shite.
This post was edited on 5/3/14 at 10:03 pm
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:02 pm to Hawgeye
I'm done arguing about this with you, troll. Go try out your flame bait on someone else.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:02 pm to roguetiger15
People on this board must have a different definition of value than I do. My definition is being difficult to replace. Sorry, but I do not see the Aggie cult as being difficult to replace.
Texas would bring more than they do. Texas Tech and Baylor would bring just as much. This assumes you want to keep the Texas market should they leave
Texas would bring more than they do. Texas Tech and Baylor would bring just as much. This assumes you want to keep the Texas market should they leave
This post was edited on 5/3/14 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:03 pm to CoffeeAg
So you speak the truth and you're a troll. Love aggie fans 
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:03 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
aTm has won 19 games the last two seasons. Texas has been down, yet won 17. Two games less than a program you're trying to tell me now "owns" the state.
19 win in sec > 17 win in big whatever
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:04 pm to Hawgeye
19 wins with an SEC schedule is significantly better than 17 wins in the Big 12. The Ole Miss team that went into Austin and waxed the Longhorns lost the last two years to A&M.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:04 pm to wrecking crew
So, two wins change everything that been in place over 100 years?
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:04 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
People on this board must have a different definition of value than I do
I think that's a given.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:05 pm to Crimson Legend
Your theory is certainly backed by Alabama beating Oklahomas arse.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:05 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Texas Tech and Baylor would bring just as much. This assumes you want to keep the Texas market should they leave
Two mediocre schools with half our alum is and absolutely tiny endowments? Less tradition, worse facilities, smaller fan bases. They're both runts and you are the worst troll on this thread.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:05 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
19 wins with an SEC schedule is significantly better than 17 wins in the Big 12. The Ole Miss team that went into Austin and waxed the Longhorns lost the last two years to A&M.
This guy get it
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:07 pm to Hawgeye
quote:aTm has had a Heisman trophy winner and most popular player since Tebow. And they've beaten Alabama. Has to count for something, right.......right?
Which describes Texass, not aTm.
aTm has won 19 games the last two seasons. Texas has been down, yet won 17. Two games less than a program you're trying to tell me now "owns" the state
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:07 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
People on this board must have a different definition of value than I do. My definition is being difficult to replace. Sorry, but I do not see the Aggie cult as being difficult to replace.
Texas would bring more than they do. Texas Tech and Baylor would bring just as much. This assumes you want to keep the Texas market should they leave
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:07 pm to CoffeeAg
Baylor has been a better program recently than aTm. So has TCU.
I'm not sure what tradition you claim aTm to have. aTm hasn't won a title since the 1930's.
I'm not sure what tradition you claim aTm to have. aTm hasn't won a title since the 1930's.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:08 pm to Hawgeye
quote:
Your theory is certainly backed by Alabama beating Oklahomas arse.
And the Big XII winner got waxed by a mid-major.
Posted on 5/3/14 at 10:10 pm to Hawgeye
Saying one conference is significantly stronger does not mean that every SEC team would beat every Big 12 team every time they play. OU took it to us and we lost. Arkansas lost two years in a row to Rutgers. Those don't change the overall point.
Wait - did I just type that Arkansas lost two years in a row to RUTGERS?
:rotflmao:
Wait - did I just type that Arkansas lost two years in a row to RUTGERS?
Popular
Back to top


0




