Started By
Message
re: Ole Miss spends $6.7 million on transfers and NIL, still not ranked #1 on on3 rankings.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 12:35 am to WildcatMike
Posted on 12/25/23 at 12:35 am to WildcatMike
Who tf is coming up with those numbers? I could grab numbers out of air and be just as accurate as that nonsense. I realize we're coming into a conference that truly doesn't understand the difference between bags and NIL deals, but media types should know better.
0
Posted on 12/25/23 at 1:15 am to WildcatMike
quote:
Ole Miss spends $6.7 million on transfers and NIL, still not ranked #1 on on3 rankings.
This isn’t the amount that Ole Miss is spending, it’s a rough estimate of the total NIL value of the entire roster. Ole Miss is ranked second in ON3’s transfer rankings despite adding the most talent because they had a reasonably talented team to begin with and Louisville’s roster was absolute dogshit. ON3’s ranking isn’t about overall quality of the class, but how much your roster talent has improved over the previous year.
Posted on 12/25/23 at 7:11 am to BigOrangeKen
Those numbers are garbage too
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:44 am to WildcatMike
I thought Kiffin wanted a salary cap
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:31 am to WildcatMike
I think that’s literally all they had
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News