Started By
Message
re: Oklahoma president David Boren on conference expansion
Posted on 5/11/17 at 7:29 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 5/11/17 at 7:29 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Spoken like someone who cant follow along/understand that simple flow of discussion.
He said football titles. I responded about football. You come along and talk about track and volleyball.
You are proof that anyone can get a commission in the US Army.
He said football titles. I responded about football. You come along and talk about track and volleyball.
You are proof that anyone can get a commission in the US Army.
1
Posted on 5/11/17 at 7:31 pm to kilo
quote:
If Mizzou wants to move to the B1G, Mizzou will move to the B1G.
My body is ready.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 7:31 pm to kilo
quote:
Missouri has done more than LSU since entering the SEC
That is your quote verbatim. As it did not explicitly state football nor could it be a reasonable expectation that someone reading the thread could infer that it implied football, the ruling on the field stands as called.
Missouri fan loses the challenge and is charged a timeout.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 7:33 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
So you clearly admit that you cant follow the chain of discussion in between two posts that are right next to each other? I mean, it even shows you what post each post is responding to as well.
You could have just said "Im a dumbass" in this post. Would have been much more succinct
You could have just said "Im a dumbass" in this post. Would have been much more succinct
Posted on 5/11/17 at 7:48 pm to AU24
OP is a troll posting a thread that is meaningless to SEC football.
Maybe OU fans are behind this hoping to be embraced by the SEC.
They and their big mouth Coach ought to go annoy some other conference.
Maybe OU fans are behind this hoping to be embraced by the SEC.
They and their big mouth Coach ought to go annoy some other conference.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 7:54 pm to kilo
quote:
OU can have our spot with the other hicks and inbreds and we can be amongst the educated and civilized where we belong.
Yup, it's a perfect marriage for everyone.
See yins later
Posted on 5/11/17 at 7:56 pm to GenghisKhan
quote:
Every time Mizzou changes conference affiliation, it gets harder for the Mizzou to win a football title.
They have done better in the SEC than they did in the old big 12
Posted on 5/11/17 at 7:57 pm to Boomer00
quote:
They have done better in the SEC than they did in the old big 12
that's not true but who wants to deal in reality.
amirite?
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:08 pm to AU24
I wish LSU would issue statement like that
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:11 pm to kilo
LSU beat the DOGSHIT out of Missouri this past year in one of their best offensive performances ever.
Missouri plays in the sec east. Which I think has a couple of really good, historic programs with potential to be presently good, but let's be real, Missouri would not even be in contention for a DIVISION title if they played in the SEC west. In fact I could realistically never see them doing better than 2-4 every single year.
If you want to be "honest" and "serious" when you're saying other sports don't matter, then stick with the mantra. Missouri's football program is nowhere near the level of almost every single team in the conference.
Missouri plays in the sec east. Which I think has a couple of really good, historic programs with potential to be presently good, but let's be real, Missouri would not even be in contention for a DIVISION title if they played in the SEC west. In fact I could realistically never see them doing better than 2-4 every single year.
If you want to be "honest" and "serious" when you're saying other sports don't matter, then stick with the mantra. Missouri's football program is nowhere near the level of almost every single team in the conference.
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:27 pm to AU24
Do any of you guys really think Oklahoma is going to leave the big12 and Texas and OK State. Not gonna happen, and the SEC doesn't want them.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:27 pm to Odysseus32
Compare the Mizzou west opponents to those that LSU played in those two division winning years. Mizzou went 4-0 against them, how did LSU do against them in the respective years. Mizzou beat teams in LSU's division they couldnt even beat yet you talk about the "weak east"
I know you like to talk about last year vs Mizzou and I understand that LSU fans have trouble understanding that 2016 isn't 2014 or 2013 but maybe you will catch on at some point.
The fact of the matter is Mizzou has had in the last 5 seaosns:
12 win season
11 win season
2 division titles
top 5 finish.
2 new years day bowl victories.
LSU:
The truth hurts. You all create this false narrative and believe it.
I know you like to talk about last year vs Mizzou and I understand that LSU fans have trouble understanding that 2016 isn't 2014 or 2013 but maybe you will catch on at some point.
The fact of the matter is Mizzou has had in the last 5 seaosns:
12 win season
11 win season
2 division titles
top 5 finish.
2 new years day bowl victories.
LSU:
The truth hurts. You all create this false narrative and believe it.
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:33 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Do any of you guys really think Oklahoma is going to leave the big12
I think they will move at some point. My guess is it will be a package deal with Texas somewhere that's not the SEC.
The Big 12 is a dead man walking, all the institutions in it realize this.
Im not convinced that when push comes to shove the powers that be in Oklahoma politics are going to let OU go down becasue it has Okie State ball and chained to its leg.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:40 pm to kilo
quote:
None of this conference expansion is predicated on people running track or any other nonrevenue sport no matter how much you think they are important to the equation.
big ten expansion ain't about football either, bub. Rutgers didn't get in for its athletic prowess
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:41 pm to kilo
I'm not going to believe anyone is this braindead.
I just came to a realization. I don't need to argue this. Nobody does. LSU is LSU and Missouri is missouri. Lol I'm out.
I just came to a realization. I don't need to argue this. Nobody does. LSU is LSU and Missouri is missouri. Lol I'm out.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:43 pm to escatawpabuckeye
So if it's only about TV sets and the conference network why Nebraska for the B1G?
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:45 pm to Odysseus32
We are talking about since we joined. Historically LSU is better.
You realize your coveted 2007 national championship came about because LSU backdoored in after #1 Missouri lost right?
You realize your coveted 2007 national championship came about because LSU backdoored in after #1 Missouri lost right?
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:46 pm to kilo
Senators. Research funding. Real money.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:47 pm to escatawpabuckeye
Nebraska is a wart on BIG academics.
Come on.
Come on.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 8:53 pm to kilo
No shite they are.
But they are also a flagship school without an instate rival with two us senators. It's pretty straightforward.
For the record I favored Missouri over Maryland. But it is less an athletic decision and more funding and politics
But they are also a flagship school without an instate rival with two us senators. It's pretty straightforward.
For the record I favored Missouri over Maryland. But it is less an athletic decision and more funding and politics
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News