Started By
Message
re: ***OFFICIAL who's going to this week's games? *Updated on pg 1*
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:30 am to Bellabama
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:30 am to Bellabama
I have too, since I've dropped 2 straight. Last week was just poor scoring all around. My first loss though.. I hit 140 with my active guys and lost still. I hateeeeee losing! 
1
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:32 am to Alahunter
Three straight here... 
How is cutie?
How is cutie?
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:34 am to Bellabama
I keep flip flopping on who I want to start at QB. I can't make up my mind. arghhhhh
I've not heard anything yet. I know she was gonna have a Cesarean, so I imagine she's gonna be out of it for awhile. I don't think she ever got a chance to check the mail yesterday. Just waiting anxiously to hear that she came through with flying colors and we have a baby Cutie with us now.
I've not heard anything yet.
I know she was gonna have a Cesarean, so I imagine she's gonna be out of it for awhile. I don't think she ever got a chance to check the mail yesterday. Just waiting anxiously to hear that she came through with flying colors and we have a baby Cutie with us now.Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:40 am to Alahunter
Well... Locker has a terrible Offensive line to hold him up... Oregon State lit up my Arizona Defense, which was pretty good...
Which is incidentally why I initially had them sitting, because Cal's D has been great except for the one weekend I had them before.
Nebraska is playing Texas this week, and so Martinez will probably get 9 points again. Because Texas sucks.
Which is incidentally why I initially had them sitting, because Cal's D has been great except for the one weekend I had them before.
Nebraska is playing Texas this week, and so Martinez will probably get 9 points again. Because Texas sucks.
This post was edited on 10/14/10 at 11:41 am
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:42 am to Bellabama
Indy QB is goin against Arky St.. like the 80th something pass defense.. but Landry and Okie are goin against Iowa State, and they suck too. I'm afraid whichever I go with, will have a pretty good first half and then sit on the bench and not get anymore points. It's a case of more success costing me points I think. I think Martinez will have a solid game. Looking at our matchups against each other, it looks like QB play is gonna be the difference overall in our game.
I think Martinez will have a solid game. Looking at our matchups against each other, it looks like QB play is gonna be the difference overall in our game.Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:46 am to Alahunter
Well... My WR situation sucks too. I got Hanks when I thought Julio was hurt, and for some reason, I'm being a total homer all season about Maze. I keep waiting for him to break it out. And NOW, if I let him go, he's going to have like 30 points. But now since I let Hanks go, he's probably going to have 30 points.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:49 am to Alahunter
They usually don't sit QBs as quickly as they sit other players. Oregon State's D looks like they give a few points away, and if their offense lights up Washington's D, look for Locker to stay in most of the game. Most points I got with Locker when I had him was when they were in close games but still lost.
I guess the question is will your Indy QB get as many points in the first half as Locker for the whole game.
I guess the question is will your Indy QB get as many points in the first half as Locker for the whole game.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:49 am to Bellabama
I hear ya and you're probably right. Maze and Hanks will probably account for 250 yds between them and 4 Td's. I've been hit an miss on my WR's for the most part. Fuller has been good, he seems to be a go to guy in the endzone for the Aggies. My others, are sporadic, so we'll see. My best RB is injured though.. damn dirty playing Aubies. 
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:52 am to Alahunter
I keep playing with the Baylor WR who got arrested at the Taco Bell. I thought they would suspend him for at least a game, but they didn't... so I got him back. He's their #1 receiver, and I think he'll get more throws. That's why I gave Hanks back.
Losing makes me neurotic.
Losing makes me neurotic.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 11:57 am to Bellabama
I dropped a WaSt WR and picked up an Oregon WR that had better numbers, not realizing they had a bye week. So I had to drop a spare TE and pick up the same WaSt WR I had so I'd have 3 to play this week. I picked up Locker, mainly as a chance to try to trade for a RB with Locke getting hurt. But with Pryor passing more since his leg is injured some, I repicked up Herron, thinking he'll get more carries again and I won't have to trade.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:03 pm to Alahunter
This is why I wish they let us borrow people's benched players...
I am totally wishy washy about John Clay... They said his ankles were bothering him, and White was going to share carries, but they gave him the ball for all of their TD's last week...but they are playing Ohio State. Baker shares with Bell, but they are playing Illinois who has been tricking people with their Rushing D. Lattimore will probably have a shitty week against Kentucky because he was gangbusters against Alabama... EVEN though he still didn't rush for 100 yards.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:14 pm to Bellabama
I saw that. I secretly got Locker, while trying to decide if I should try to offer him back to you for Clay. I know Clay's ankles were hurting and you probably wouldn't play him this week against my defense, since OSU's defense was so good. And thought since it wouldn't hurt you, you might consider it. Then I thought, well.. someone else might need a QB and a better RB that might need to trade in another week or so, so I decided to just hang onto him to see if I thought I could fanagle a better trade later on. Plus I thought it'd be my luck, I'd get a RB I couldn't use and you'd beat me with Locker as your starting QB this week if I did it.
I secretly got Locker, while trying to decide if I should try to offer him back to you for Clay. I know Clay's ankles were hurting and you probably wouldn't play him this week against my defense, since OSU's defense was so good. And thought since it wouldn't hurt you, you might consider it. Then I thought, well.. someone else might need a QB and a better RB that might need to trade in another week or so, so I decided to just hang onto him to see if I thought I could fanagle a better trade later on. Plus I thought it'd be my luck, I'd get a RB I couldn't use and you'd beat me with Locker as your starting QB this week if I did it. This post was edited on 10/14/10 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:14 pm to Alahunter
That would only work if I wanted Locker... Persa's turned out better...
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:15 pm to Bellabama
ahhh.. so THIS is where the IM thread is.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:16 pm to Bellabama
I was hoping you'd overanalyze and think he'd be a better option for you as they got into more Pac10 play and his dual QB features would end up blossoming as the season went.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:16 pm to Rohan2Reed
We are talking fantasy. Pull up a chair.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:42 pm to Bellabama
I will be at the Ga Southern UT Chatty game.
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:43 pm to CigarLovingTiger
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:55 pm to Bellabama
whaddup yo
Posted on 10/14/10 at 12:59 pm to RedElephants
Trying to figure out if I really want to go to the Alabama game. I wish someone would start a helicopter service from Birmingham to Tuscaloosa... sort of like the helicopters that take you to the Newark airport from Manhattan.
Page 12 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News