Started By
Message
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:54 pm to tom1987
AU/LSU fans arguing about how many titles Bama has are like dirt poor people arguing about how much money Bill Gates has.
I love these threads.
I love these threads.
This post was edited on 1/2/13 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:10 pm to USMC Gators
quote:
That's a bad example because there's been a system in place that everyone agreed to play under to decide a champion since 1998.
No it is the same thing. Alabama going unbeaten in 1925 and beating Washington was a lot like Boise State going unbeaten and beating Oklahoma.
Alabama was an upstart team who played in a region of the country nobody cared about or payed attention to. They were exactly like Boise State.
So, telling me that Alabama should have won over Dartmouth in 1925 is a lot like arguing that Boise State should have won over Florida in 2006. It is the same thing. The fact the we now have a "system" for determining a "champ" doesn't mean a whole lot.
This post was edited on 1/2/13 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:15 pm to TxTiger82
Good lord son. Perhaps you should be on a Texas Ten forum telling Wv how wonderful the Longhorns are.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:17 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Good lord son. Perhaps you should be on a Texas Ten forum telling Wv how wonderful the Longhorns are.
You done?
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:34 pm to crimsonian
Bama fans want to shut down any real conversation on this matter by labeling anyone who criticizes their "NCs" as a whiner.
Pretty much tells you what you need to know. They are incredibly sensitive about this sort of thing because they know "14" is bullshite.
Pretty much tells you what you need to know. They are incredibly sensitive about this sort of thing because they know "14" is bullshite.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:37 pm to TxTiger82
You've not added much.
I know what people 90 yrs ago were thinking..blah blah.
I know what people 90 yrs ago were thinking..blah blah.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:37 pm to TxTiger82
Quick question. Why does the number of national titles we claim bother you so much? Are they all 100% legit? Well it's tough to be when prior to 1936 there was no real way to determine a single champion. If you want to say our undefeated rosé bowl teams of the 20's are not legit champions than go ahead but we are still gonna claim them and you are still gonna be bitter about it.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:39 pm to Alahunter
quote:
You've not added much.
I added a helluva lot more than you.
Alabama fans are the kings of revisionism in cfb history.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:40 pm to Patton
quote:
Why does the number of national titles we claim bother you so much?
It doesn't, really. We were having a conversation. Most Alabama fans don't want to have this conversation.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:41 pm to TxTiger82
You added nothing but your opinion.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:42 pm to Alahunter
quote:
You added nothing but your opinion.
And you've added nothing, period. Does my opinion really offend you that much? Could you be any more sensitive about it?
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:43 pm to TxTiger82
I don't see why. The system was imperfect back than. We had great teams that were deserving of being named champions and by many they were.
Multiple teams use so called "Bama" math to get their titles. At the end of the day no matter how you'd like to determine them, Bama has more legitimate titles than any team. Sorry that rustles your jimmies
Multiple teams use so called "Bama" math to get their titles. At the end of the day no matter how you'd like to determine them, Bama has more legitimate titles than any team. Sorry that rustles your jimmies
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:46 pm to Patton
quote:
Sorry that rustles your jimmies
It doesn't, trust me.
quote:
The system was imperfect back than.
No, there was no system back then.
quote:
We had great teams that were deserving of being n
But not deserving in 1925 or 1926.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:52 pm to TxTiger82
Ok doesn't really matter what I or any Bama fan says in this thread. If you want to believe we have less titles than we do go ahead to do that. But we are going to continue to claim 14 and there isn't anything to change it
But please keep bitching about it
But please keep bitching about it
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:55 pm to Patton
quote:
If you want to believe we have less titles than we do go ahead to do that. But we are going to continue to claim 14 and there isn't anything to change it
I realize that, and I don't "believe" anything about whether Bama does or does not claim those titles.
quote:
But please keep bitching about it
I'm really not bitching. I was discussing. If you would like to join this discussion, be my guest.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:58 pm to Patton
quote:What if we want to believe you have the exact number of titles that you do?
If you want to believe we have less titles than we do go ahead to do that.
quote:At least. But this has nothing to do with the first part of your statement.
we are going to continue to claim 14
Alright. I'm done instigating.
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top


0




