Started By
Message
re: MS State fans - will MSU hire Petrino after this season or next
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:26 pm to engie
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:26 pm to engie
quote:
The extent to which you do not know what you are talking about is hilarious. Really.
Stick to the topic. We are not talking about Hud recruiting at State. We are talking about Hud recruiting against OM from ULL.
This post was edited on 5/16/13 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:27 pm to Fipitan
quote:
Let's define "consistently" before I pull down your tighty whities and spank you in front of all these posters...
We took 5 of the top 9 composite players in MS last year. You got 3 -- 2 OM legacies and a SP player.
Yep, sounds like imminent dominance...
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:29 pm to engie
quote:
We took 5 of the top 9 composite players in MS last year. You got 3 -- 2 OM legacies and a SP player.
And that, my friends is why we define terms.
In the future, be a lamb and make sure you add IN THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI to your assertions about recruiting prowess vs Freezus.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:31 pm to Fipitan
quote:
Stick to the topic.
quote:
We are not talking about Hud recruiting at State.
Obviously, yes we are. That was the entire point of contention.
quote:
We are talking about Hud recruiting against OM from ULL.
In which case, surely you can show me a bunch of players Freeze grabbed while in Jonesboro that Mullen wanted.
And the bad thing is -- Hud actually does prettymuch have a South Panola dream team down in Lafayette.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:33 pm to engie
I'm baffled as to how State fans can defend Mullen while naming his successor
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:34 pm to Fipitan
quote:
And that, my friends is why we define terms.
I said "head to head" initially. What, exactly, do you think that implies -- if not players we both recruited against each other on?
You recruited very well last year. You did not, however, do it at MSU's expense in any tangible way beyond historical norms -- which is, to say, we both get about 50% of the players we both go after.
quote:
In the future, be a lamb and make sure you add IN THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI to your assertions about recruiting prowess vs Freezus.
In the future, please employ common reading comprehension so that what I say in simple terms will be easily understood...
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:42 pm to engie
quote:
Obviously, yes we are. That was the entire point of contention.
Actually, no. My reply to NIH was only, ONNNNNLLLLLYYYYY about his assertion that Hud grabbed some top talent from OM stomping grounds while recruiting the past 2 season at ULL. This is what's called a hijack, or thread splinter. Or, you could just say that NIH and I were enjoying some banter before you stumbled in and barfed all over the floor...
I replied that the players he signed at ULL from SP and Madison (OM stomping grounds) were not HS Seniors that OM was after. They were transfers from JUCO's (ie, Tig Barksdale) who left OM or were booted.
That's it. Hud had not signed a player to ULL's roster that OM or MSU have wanted since he got there. He has been picking up our leftovers, in culinary parlance.
quote:
In which case, surely you can show me a bunch of players Freeze grabbed while in Jonesboro that Mullen wanted.
w. t. f? Are you having an aneurism? Do you need a doctor?
quote:
And the bad thing is -- Hud actually does prettymuch have a South Panola dream team down in Lafayette.
In what world is this a "bad thing"? Good for Hud. If he can keep those kids eligible and headed in the right direction, how on earth is this a bad thing? I assume you meant, it's bad for OM because it shows how awesome he is at recruiting and how MSU will dominate with him as HC. Unfortunately for you, those same kids who didn't qualify or were dismissed for academics from OM would also fail to qualify at MSU...
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:45 pm to EC Reb
quote:
I'm baffled as to how State fans can defend Mullen while naming his successor
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:46 pm to engie
quote:
I said "head to head" initially. What, exactly, do you think that implies -- if not players we both recruited against each other on?
MSU had offers on over half our recruits. Those are head to head.
quote:
You recruited very well last year. You did not, however, do it at MSU's expense in any tangible way beyond historical norms
If we sign a top 10 class every year, please explain why I should give a single frick whether it hurts MSU or not?
quote:
which is, to say, we both get about 50% of the players we both go after.
What does this have to do with anything at all... ever?
quote:
In the future, please employ common reading comprehension so that what I say in simple terms will be easily understood...
What you say is never easily understood by anyone, but it is often VERY simple.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:56 pm to EC Reb
Well I don't like people bad mouthing my wife...but I still cheat on her.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:58 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
quote:
but I still cheat on her.
I want a turn. But she has to shower first.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:58 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
+1
I'm faithful to Enrique but how can I say he's better looking than Juan circa Portland '05?
I'm faithful to Enrique but how can I say he's better looking than Juan circa Portland '05?
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:58 pm to Fipitan
Sure...she's fictional..so have at her.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 2:59 pm to NIH
quote:
Juan circa Portland '05
Yummy yummy
Posted on 5/16/13 at 3:02 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
This thread has gone from Petrino going to state to Mullen being a good coach to Egg Bowl predictions to Hudspeth and his hot arse wife to Mississippi recruiting and has now arrived at fricking fictional women. 
Posted on 5/16/13 at 3:02 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
quote:
Sure...she's fictional..so have at her.
DUDE!!! Bitch has a sack, bro. Not cool.
Did you get a
From the
?
Posted on 5/16/13 at 3:09 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
A summary of my time in Portland:
Posted on 5/16/13 at 3:09 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
quote:
A mouth's a mouth brah
I'll allow it.
Popular
Back to top


1




