Started By
Message
re: Most infamous games in SEC since 1992
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:21 am to tigerfan in bamaland
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:21 am to tigerfan in bamaland
so despite failing to qualify with the definition of PI, and despite what the officials on the field, in home office, and others officials have stated, its still PI
I realize deep down in your heart you wanted LSU to have a win and think everyone is out to get you but it wasnt PI

I realize deep down in your heart you wanted LSU to have a win and think everyone is out to get you but it wasnt PI
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:31 am to NYCAuburn
When in doubt, it's a penalty. It was in doubt enough to throw the flag.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:31 am to auburnphan23
quote:
auburnphan23
do you post about anything other than UGA?
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:52 am to NYCAuburn
I hate this argument a lot.
First of all, the ball was certainly in the realm of catchable. It was not completely uncatchable. Arguing that it was completely uncatchable is fricken insane. We all saw the play. We've all watched it a bunch of times. Give it up.
THAT BEING SAID:
Even if the call had been PI, (which it probably should have been) it doesn't mean LSU would have won. They would have had to still get the ball into the fricken end zone, which the failed to do all day long.
So I think most rational Auburn fans need to sit back and admit they got a little lucky in this game on a few specific calls, and I think rational LSU fans need to admit that even if the call had been correct the game could still very well have ended in a loss.
First of all, the ball was certainly in the realm of catchable. It was not completely uncatchable. Arguing that it was completely uncatchable is fricken insane. We all saw the play. We've all watched it a bunch of times. Give it up.
THAT BEING SAID:
Even if the call had been PI, (which it probably should have been) it doesn't mean LSU would have won. They would have had to still get the ball into the fricken end zone, which the failed to do all day long.
So I think most rational Auburn fans need to sit back and admit they got a little lucky in this game on a few specific calls, and I think rational LSU fans need to admit that even if the call had been correct the game could still very well have ended in a loss.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:56 am to slayerxing
quote:
First of all, the ball was certainly in the realm of catchable. It was not completely uncatchable. Arguing that it was completely uncatchable is fricken insane. We all saw the play. We've all watched it a bunch of times. Give it up.
you have to be within reach to be catchable. are you saying he was within reach?
Also if a ball goes over a players head/hands out of bounds by 5 ft or more from the tips of his hands, would you classify that as catchable?
quote:
So I think most rational Auburn fans need to sit back and admit they got a little lucky in this game on a few specific calls, and I think rational LSU fans need to admit that even if the call had been correct the game could still very well have ended in a loss.
calls go either direction, its always the losing team that laments on missed calls and missed calls for the wining team are always forgotten
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 8:01 am
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:01 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
The LSU/Auburn game several years back where Auburn was called for PI on a fourth down and the refs picked up the flag claiming the ball was tipped (2006 I think). I love watching LSU fans go full corndog as much as anyone, but they got robbed that day.
The ball was tipped. The db tipped it, thus no pi.
Also that game proved that Russell was going to be a bust.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:11 am to NYCAuburn
I'm not going to debate with someone that is clearly overly invested in irrationally defending something, especially when the outcome had no impact whatsoever on my life.
I just think both sides need to let it go. It was only one play that happened to go Auburn's way. The game had like 118 plays run in it. 1 play typically does not determine the outcome of a football game.
I just think both sides need to let it go. It was only one play that happened to go Auburn's way. The game had like 118 plays run in it. 1 play typically does not determine the outcome of a football game.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:15 am to slayerxing
quote:
m not going to debate with someone that is clearly overly invested in irrationally defending something, especially when the outcome had no impact whatsoever on my life.
I was merely asking a question to gauge what you deem uncatchable, refusal to answer suggest unsubstantiated conclusions. I love how when you have legit debate on here you are obsessed or irrational etc...
quote:
It was only one play that happened to go Auburn's way. The game had like 118 plays run in it. 1 play typically does not determine the outcome of a football game.
You probably shouldnt have posted this

Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:16 am to NYCAuburn
if it wasn't PI it was at the very minimum defensive holding
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:17 am to Choctaw
quote:
at the very minimum defensive holding
Do you know the qualifiers for defensive holding?
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:32 am to slayerxing
quote:
It was only one play that happened to go Auburn's way.
lulz
I could give Auburn this play and are there plenty of other examples.
Lafell mugged in the EZ end of first half. No call. Hester catches a swing pass for a first down and then takes two steps when the ball gets knocked out. Initially ruled a fumble out of bounds. Then mysteriously reversed to incomplete on a critical 4th down play. Phantom hold called on a critical third down conversion. Off the top of my head. I am sure there were more.
I dont blame Auburn fans, but what I cannot understand is some Aubun fan's inability to admit they got just about every call. Why not? Who cares? You won.
We beat Bama on a bullshite PI interference call in 04. Basically won us the game. Also saban made them reverse a possession call with the jumbtoron before replay was instituted. (although it was the right call.)
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 8:33 am
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:33 am to NYCAuburn
no...i just threw that out there to piss you off
Posted on 4/30/14 at 9:02 am to FourThreeForty
For Georgia...
I'd say the 2007 WLOCP GA/FL Enzone stomp
the GA/UA Blackout stomp
and the bad call on AJ Green in the GA/LSU game.
I'd say the 2007 WLOCP GA/FL Enzone stomp
the GA/UA Blackout stomp
and the bad call on AJ Green in the GA/LSU game.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 9:27 am to tigerfan in bamaland
quote:These are the two plays that are mind boggling. Forget the other crap we are arguing about. And for the record, I know LSU has used some help to win games, i remember when we played Bama around 02-04 and our defensive back pulled out a gun and shot a bama WR in the back in order to make an int in the endzone(obviously it didnt happen like that but it might as well have)
Lafell mugged in the EZ end of first half. No call. Hester catches a swing pass for a first down and then takes two steps when the ball gets knocked out. Initially ruled a fumble out of bounds. Then mysteriously reversed to incomplete on a critical 4th down play

Posted on 4/30/14 at 9:36 am to slayerxing
quote:
Even if the call had been PI, (which it probably should have been) it doesn't mean LSU would have won. They would have had to still get the ball into the fricken end zone, which they failed to do all day long.
Well, the ball got to the end zone in the first half, but 'interference' made the ball uncatchable...oh, wait:
LINK
That occurred on LSU's FG drive at the end of the 1st half. They should have gotten 7 on that drive instead of 3.
quote:
1 play typically does not determine the outcome of a football game.
Had they gotten the TD in the 1st, they would have been driving for a FG at the end to win it. They had two plays from AU's 19 yard line at the end going for the TD when a FG should have won it.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 9:38 am to mjw60532
Also, the AJ Green celebration penalty comes to mind against LSU in 09.
The call me gesture penalty against JD Phillips against LSU.
The no penalty against Mettenburger of LSU for the same call me gesture.
--------------------------------
Auburn and LSU have the most lopsided calls when playing in their own stadium.
The call me gesture penalty against JD Phillips against LSU.
The no penalty against Mettenburger of LSU for the same call me gesture.
--------------------------------
Auburn and LSU have the most lopsided calls when playing in their own stadium.
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 9:44 am
Posted on 4/30/14 at 9:40 am to lsupride87
quote:
These are the two plays that are mind boggling. Forget the other crap we are arguing about. And for the record, I know LSU has used some help to win games, i remember when we played Bama around 02-04 and our defensive back pulled out a gun and shot a bama WR in the back in order to make an int in the endzone(obviously it didnt happen like that but it might as well have)
This.
If a team plays enough games, bad calls generally will even out. HOWEVER, they don't necessarily even out over the course of just one game. The 2006 game was an example of the majority of bad calls going against one team.
Was a whistle blown before Troy Twillie intercepted Nix's pass? The world may never know...
Posted on 4/30/14 at 9:52 am to observant1
quote:So rich coming from a Bama fan, so rich.
Auburn and LSU have the most lopsided calls when playing in their own stadium.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:30 am to olddawg26
quote:
A ref threw a flag for targeting before the hit even happened, and it wasn't targeting. It reset the downs, kicked off a 1st string player, and lost the game,
I know which play you're talking about. I think that hit was soft as hell. I could see roughing the passer on that one, but an ejection was too much. The other "targeting" for the hit on Krause was worse. That was a terrible call. For once, the calls in a close game went our way.
Back to top
