Started By
Message
re: Mizzou still has the best group of WR'S in the SEC
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:31 pm to LSU1NSEC
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:31 pm to LSU1NSEC
quote:
mizzou offseason football: it's like snorting a f'n sleeping pill and chasing it with a shot of nyquil
And yet you consistently appear in Mizzou threads to run us by your usual garbage. You're a strange little man.
0
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:32 pm to TigerNick23
quote:
because he can't stop... Mizzou
42-10 in 2012 says otherwise. Solid dickriding tho.
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:40 pm to chattabama
You mean with our third string offensive line, Corbin Berkstresser as our starting QB, the year Henry Josey never took a snap, and half the defense was on injured reserve! Seriously you're comparing 2012 Mizzou to 2013 Mizzou! Sorry not last years team. When you handed Auburn a trip to the SEC title game I knew Auburn presented more problems than Bama would have. When Mizzou was wrapping up their East title against A&M, the score to the "Best rivalry in college football" 
went up on the scoreboard in Faurot everyone collectively groaned because we knew Auburn was the better opponent. Simply put if you lose to Oklahoma a team that nearly lost to a team that hadn't won a conference game in two seasons you are shite!
went up on the scoreboard in Faurot everyone collectively groaned because we knew Auburn was the better opponent. Simply put if you lose to Oklahoma a team that nearly lost to a team that hadn't won a conference game in two seasons you are shite! Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:43 pm to TigerNick23
Mizzou did beat teams dealing with major injuries to get to the SECCG this year, no? Why is the standard different now?
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:49 pm to TigerNick23
Hate to disagree with ya here, but there are two SEC teams that would spank Mizzous arse on a regular basis. Bama, and hate to mention it cause of their douche bag fans, LSU.
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:52 pm to chattabama
QB is not an injury teams usually are able to overcome, and losing your entire offensive line makes it more challenging. Losing skill position players is much easier to overcome than losing a starting QB. Also we beat teams with all their players A&M, UT (sucked), Vandy (on the road, don't laugh they beat Florida, and Georgia) , Kentucky (on the road, sucked) , Ole Miss (on the road), Georgia (on the road), Florida (sucked should have beat USCe, and were 9 minutes away from a national championship.
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:52 pm to chattabama
UGA and UF were decimated by injuries so your Tigers caught a break. Missouri had a good football team that was exposed in the SECCG.
What if means nothing. Alabama came to your house and wiped the floor with you.
What if means nothing. Alabama came to your house and wiped the floor with you.
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:56 pm to antibarner
Two words, C-O-R-B-I-N B-E-R-K-S-T-R-E-S-S-E-R!
The guy is currently 4th soon to be 5th, 6th on the depth chart, and I'm not sure why he hasn't transferred yet
The guy is currently 4th soon to be 5th, 6th on the depth chart, and I'm not sure why he hasn't transferred yet
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:58 pm to TigerNick23
Whatever you say there, champ. We can play in the fantasy world where Mizzou would have beaten Bama, but right now all we have to go by in the real world is head to head results.
Bama won the last game, and it was a total arse kicking. The game wasn't near as close as the scoreboard indicates, and the scoreboard showed a pounding. Bama could've hung 70 on that Mizzou team if Saban wanted.
Bama might've lost to FSU, but would've beaten Mizzou. No doubt in my mind.
Bama won the last game, and it was a total arse kicking. The game wasn't near as close as the scoreboard indicates, and the scoreboard showed a pounding. Bama could've hung 70 on that Mizzou team if Saban wanted.
Bama might've lost to FSU, but would've beaten Mizzou. No doubt in my mind.
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:01 am to chattabama
LSU and Ole Miss are the deepest in WR's, DGB isn't even on the team anymore
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:04 am to VaRebel1
LSU has a lot of talent at WR, but most of it is inexperienced. Bama has a lot of experience coming back and we have some relatively unknown but highly recruited WRs such as Robert Foster and Chris Black.
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:06 am to chattabama
You couldn't beat Oklahoma! How would you have beaten FSU or Mizzou?
My wish is to make Alabama VS. Mizzou our cross over opponent each season. Give Arkansas to MSU, we could call it the Don James Coaching Tree Battle
My wish is to make Alabama VS. Mizzou our cross over opponent each season. Give Arkansas to MSU, we could call it the Don James Coaching Tree Battle
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:12 am to TigerNick23
quote:
My wish is to make Alabama VS. Mizzou our cross over opponent each season.
Oh good grief dude, I know you're young but this is getting delusional.
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:14 am to TigerNick23
quote:
You couldn't beat Oklahoma! How would you have beaten FSU or Mizzou?
What does not beating OU have to do with beating Mizzou or FSU? OU installed a completely different offense than what they ran all year. It worked. Each game has a life of its own. No such thing as transitive property or Bama would have pounded Auburn who was beaten by the LSU team that was humiliated by Bama. I shouldn't have to explain basic principles to you.
quote:
My wish is to make Alabama VS. Mizzou our cross over opponent each season. Give Arkansas to MSU, we could call it the Don James Coaching Tree Battle
Not me. I prefer the history between Bama and UT. I still see Mizzou as a Big 12 team. Besides the last game was boring as frick. Although I'd like to see the SEC play 9 conference games so we can play you more often than once every six years.
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:15 am to Mizzou4ever
Well at least they couldn't claim we played nobody, and FYI I'm 28
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:19 am to chattabama
Certainly not Big 12 anymore, some teams haven't achieved this yet
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:22 am to TigerNick23
Congrats on the divisional title.
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:23 am to TigerNick23
Listen, we are on the same team, but there is no way we could match up against Bama on a yearly basis. That is a 90% loss each time. Don't let the haters get to you with the "we played nobody" and "the good teams you did play were decimated with injuries", it's their sorry arse excuse and denial for one of the newbies winning a SEC division.
Posted on 4/13/14 at 4:04 am to Mizzou4ever
Memo to Mizzou fans: partial success can be fleeting and easily forgotten.
See ya in the Swamp this year, 2014 Gators wont be 2013 Gators I can assure you of that.
See ya in the Swamp this year, 2014 Gators wont be 2013 Gators I can assure you of that.
Posted on 4/13/14 at 7:55 am to reel_gator8
quote:
Memo to Mizzou fans: partial success can be fleeting and easily forgotten.
Yeah like we didn't know that as we got lost in the wilderness through the 80s and most of the 90s.
Page 5 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News