Started By
Message
re: MIZZOU is curing cancer
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:37 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:37 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
New chemistry could cure human cancers when funding is secured.
Missouri is in the SEC now, so cure for cancer will have to wait until after football stadium upgrades.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 2:49 pm to the808bass
quote:
the808bass
So you have no facts, just assumptions?? Got ya.
To approve any drug the FDA requires drug companies show there drug is more effective than a placebo in 2 clinical trials, and the negative results are discarded.
Since you are to lazy to look it up i will give you an easy place to hear it.
8:40 mark
God why are all you Mizzou fans so dumb and uneducated?
Why do Mizzou fans think assumptions will stand in an argument instead of bringing facts?
This post was edited on 4/3/13 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 4/3/13 at 3:13 pm to beebefootballfan
I'm not assuming anything. It costs ~$1B to bring a new drug to market.
Drugs are subject to ongoing review. Even if a drug beats placebo (by a statistically significant margin), it may not be approved on the basis of side-effects.
After approval, the drug is subject to post-approval monitoring. Side effects which are reported can be the basis for re-labeling, a change in indication or even a black box warning (the basic death knell of a drug).
Your simplistic naïveté serves no purpose.
Drugs are subject to ongoing review. Even if a drug beats placebo (by a statistically significant margin), it may not be approved on the basis of side-effects.
After approval, the drug is subject to post-approval monitoring. Side effects which are reported can be the basis for re-labeling, a change in indication or even a black box warning (the basic death knell of a drug).
Your simplistic naïveté serves no purpose.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 3:19 pm to the808bass
quote:
I'm not assuming anything. It costs ~$1B to bring a new drug to market.
Drugs are subject to ongoing review. Even if a drug beats placebo (by a statistically significant margin), it may not be approved on the basis of side-effects.
After approval, the drug is subject to post-approval monitoring. Side effects which are reported can be the basis for re-labeling, a change in indication or even a black box warning (the basic death knell of a drug).
Your simplistic naïveté serves no purpose.
No crap, do you know how to read? I was discussing Clinical trials.
quote:
quote:
People need to do research about Clinical trials
Yea its crazy what it costs, and that a drug only has to have positive results twice to get approved. Pharma industry is one f'd up place these days.
This post was edited on 4/3/13 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 4/3/13 at 3:21 pm to beebefootballfan
So you admit that the following statement was sloppy, incorrect and generally misleading?
quote:
and that a drug only has to have positive results twice to get approved
Posted on 4/3/13 at 3:23 pm to zou_keeper
Using naked liposomes to passively and non-specifically accumulate in tumor sites.
But really, neat work.
But really, neat work.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 3:25 pm to the808bass
quote:
So you admit that the following statement was sloppy, incorrect and generally misleading?
What that for a drug to be approved through clinical trials it only has to out perform the placebo 2 times? No i do not. Nor will i ever. I can't help it that you can't figure out what i was saying.
Posted on 4/3/13 at 3:39 pm to zou_keeper
That will be beginning the zombie apocalypse! jk
nice work
nice work

Posted on 4/3/13 at 4:21 pm to zou_keeper
This is cool, but boron neutron capture is not a new idea and it was not developed at Mizzou. This isn't meant to denigrate the work done at Mizzou, just to point out that it's not exactly earth-shattering. If I had a nickle for every rosy article published by the public relations divisions at research institutions...
Relying purely on the enhanced permeability and retention effect of tumors (which this researcher seems to be doing) for selective uptake of boron is not going to be enough. I was in a research group during college where we were working on liposome delivery systems for chemotherapy agents so I'm well aware of this problem.
As someone who works in radiation oncology, I'm glad to see so many people working on new methods for using radiation to treat cancer. I especially look forward to the use of heavy ion therapy and neutron capture techniques.
Relying purely on the enhanced permeability and retention effect of tumors (which this researcher seems to be doing) for selective uptake of boron is not going to be enough. I was in a research group during college where we were working on liposome delivery systems for chemotherapy agents so I'm well aware of this problem.
As someone who works in radiation oncology, I'm glad to see so many people working on new methods for using radiation to treat cancer. I especially look forward to the use of heavy ion therapy and neutron capture techniques.
Popular
Back to top
