Started By
Message
re: Mizzou and A&M the honeymoon is over
Posted on 6/27/13 at 12:53 pm to TooCold
Posted on 6/27/13 at 12:53 pm to TooCold
quote:
two teams that have been on the outside looking in for most of the history of college football, you sure do talk a lot of shite.
fricking aggies and their reinvention of history. You do realize that LSU is 20-5-1 against the Aggies since the 50s. You check out historical facts and not just spout shite off. This third tier university owns your arse
2
Posted on 6/27/13 at 12:58 pm to LSUNV
quote:
fricking aggies and their reinvention of history. You do realize that LSU is 20-5-1 against the Aggies since the 50s. You check out historical facts and not just spout shite off. This third tier university owns your arse
So much fail. You guys are 19-11 since the 50s vs TAMU.
And 9-9 since the 70s.
Carry on. Thought I'd help third tier count.
This post was edited on 6/27/13 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 6/27/13 at 12:58 pm to LSUNV
quote:
Now, that is pathetic.
If that's what our move is, then so be it!! Our pathetic asses are doing pretty well right now....
Posted on 6/27/13 at 1:04 pm to BigD Ag
frick you try again frick face spouting off shite again.
quote:
That winning streak was part of a 10-game unbeaten streak for LSU from 1960 to 1969 which included a 7–7 tie in 1966. From 1945–90, LSU went 21–6–1 vs. Texas A&M.
This post was edited on 6/27/13 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 6/27/13 at 1:08 pm to Maroon Flash
Greatness. Pure greatness.
Posted on 6/27/13 at 1:14 pm to SWCBonfire
LSU fans overall are bitter and angry. I guess Bama did that to them? 
This post was edited on 6/27/13 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 6/27/13 at 1:19 pm to TooCold
quote:
Also, as far as specific teams go, I wasn't expecting to hear so much garbage from Arkansas and LSU fans as I did. For two teams that have been on the outside looking in for most of the history of college football, you sure do talk a lot of shite.
LSU is a top 10 program all-time while A&M isn't even top 20. Posted on 6/27/13 at 1:21 pm to BRUNNIN4
A&M fans showing off that education
I used to think all the dumb aggie jokes were stupid, but I am starting to realize they were not jokes so much as proclamations
I used to think all the dumb aggie jokes were stupid, but I am starting to realize they were not jokes so much as proclamations
This post was edited on 6/27/13 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 6/27/13 at 1:43 pm to lsufancy63
quote:
Like LSU got dismantled by Clemson. LSU did not want to be in that bowl and still lost in the last second by 1 point. It's not like Clemson dismantled LSU. Louisville on the other hand dismantled FL!!!!!
They dismantled you in the 4th, holding you to 1 yard offensively and won the game.
Posted on 6/27/13 at 1:45 pm to VonDaMan
quote:
They dismantled you in the 4th, holding you to 1 yard offensively and won the game.
Using this logic you can't deny that LSU dismantled A&M in the second half last year.
This post was edited on 6/27/13 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 6/27/13 at 1:49 pm to LSUNV
What part of my statement is not true? For most of football history, LSU has been on the outside looking in.
By the end of the 1999 season, your overall record was 610-355-47 which would have put you barely in the top 25 for winning percentage.
Luck for you, two coaches named Saban and Miles came along to resurrect a program that had been faltering since McClendon left. Hell, in the last 13 season you have won as many games as you did in the previous 25 season. Before Saban, you were mediocre at best. Before McClendon, you sucked.
I know you all hate Saban, but you should be offering daily rim jobs to the man for giving you what you have now. You are not Alabama. You are not Notre Dame. You are not Michigan. You are a program that was stuck in neutral until you hit a gold mine in Saban. It's because of him that you are able to talk all the shite that you talk...and most years you are still on the outside looking in because the man that made you who you are, also dominates you every year and keeps you from getting you back to the big show.
Sorry. Sometimes the truth hurts.
By the end of the 1999 season, your overall record was 610-355-47 which would have put you barely in the top 25 for winning percentage.
Luck for you, two coaches named Saban and Miles came along to resurrect a program that had been faltering since McClendon left. Hell, in the last 13 season you have won as many games as you did in the previous 25 season. Before Saban, you were mediocre at best. Before McClendon, you sucked.
I know you all hate Saban, but you should be offering daily rim jobs to the man for giving you what you have now. You are not Alabama. You are not Notre Dame. You are not Michigan. You are a program that was stuck in neutral until you hit a gold mine in Saban. It's because of him that you are able to talk all the shite that you talk...and most years you are still on the outside looking in because the man that made you who you are, also dominates you every year and keeps you from getting you back to the big show.
Sorry. Sometimes the truth hurts.
Posted on 6/27/13 at 1:50 pm to TooCold
quote:
Before McClendon, you sucked.
This is where I stopped reading. You are very misinformed.
Posted on 6/27/13 at 1:54 pm to BRUNNIN4
Fair enough. Sucked was probably not the right word. Average to slightly above average perhaps. I mean you have 1958 and all, but other than that you were an average program overall. Nothing too awe inspiring and you had a hard time holding on to coaches. Just my observation.
Posted on 6/27/13 at 1:55 pm to bigDgator
I don't think mizzou ever had a honeymoon...I think it went straight to the incident phase
1)Has your perception of the SEC or any teams in particular changed?
Not really. I just pay more attention to the league than I did before. Main changes are how I view fan bases. In my opinion LSU has been by far the best and most welcoming fan base. Alabama is less arrogant than I thought they'd be. Arky, Ole Miss, and Kentucky are douchier than I would've expected (coincidentally 3 of the top 4 closest schools to Mizzou). Other than that no major surprises.
2)Do you feel a part of the conference yet?
Not yet. In fairness, I never felt we were part of the Big 12 either. Since the death of the Big 8 Mizzou hasn't really belonged to a conference IMO. I think in time my feelings will change, especially once more people from SEC land actually visit Missouri and realize that most of their assumptions about us have been misguided/aren't true at all. Right now we're still a large chunk in the blender...we're technically in but it'll take some time to fully homogenize.
3)What would you change/not change?
Obviously I would change just about everything about 2012. It was a historically bad year across the board for us and not what I wanted to start out like. I'd have let Pinkel go after this season and begun rebuilding instead of delaying the inevitable. I'd have kept Michael Dixon instead of kicking him off the basketball team despite there being no evidence or legal basis for the accusations. I would prefer Mizzou to be in the west because it makes more sense. I wouldn't change the move to the SEC. It was necessary for us. I wouldn't change my expectations. I still see us, long-term, as a top 3or4 team in the east (6-8 overall). I still see us as a top 3 basketball program. Those are most of the things I would/wouldn't change.
1)Has your perception of the SEC or any teams in particular changed?
Not really. I just pay more attention to the league than I did before. Main changes are how I view fan bases. In my opinion LSU has been by far the best and most welcoming fan base. Alabama is less arrogant than I thought they'd be. Arky, Ole Miss, and Kentucky are douchier than I would've expected (coincidentally 3 of the top 4 closest schools to Mizzou). Other than that no major surprises.
2)Do you feel a part of the conference yet?
Not yet. In fairness, I never felt we were part of the Big 12 either. Since the death of the Big 8 Mizzou hasn't really belonged to a conference IMO. I think in time my feelings will change, especially once more people from SEC land actually visit Missouri and realize that most of their assumptions about us have been misguided/aren't true at all. Right now we're still a large chunk in the blender...we're technically in but it'll take some time to fully homogenize.
3)What would you change/not change?
Obviously I would change just about everything about 2012. It was a historically bad year across the board for us and not what I wanted to start out like. I'd have let Pinkel go after this season and begun rebuilding instead of delaying the inevitable. I'd have kept Michael Dixon instead of kicking him off the basketball team despite there being no evidence or legal basis for the accusations. I would prefer Mizzou to be in the west because it makes more sense. I wouldn't change the move to the SEC. It was necessary for us. I wouldn't change my expectations. I still see us, long-term, as a top 3or4 team in the east (6-8 overall). I still see us as a top 3 basketball program. Those are most of the things I would/wouldn't change.
This post was edited on 6/27/13 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 6/27/13 at 2:14 pm to TooCold
quote:
What part of my statement is not true? For most of football history, LSU has been on the outside looking in.
Dear Lord, the truth, you either are retarded or dumb and I am thinking its a little of both. Retread my post
Coming from a fan of a program that does not have one consensus NC DIAF
We will shut you up this year
This post was edited on 6/27/13 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 6/27/13 at 2:40 pm to LSUNV
Of course it is my opinion...based on facts. I pointed it out in detail based upon your win/loss record and history. Again, for most of football history LSU has been slightly above average. The last decade has been a phenomenal run and it was started by Saban. You owe him a lot. Do you need a credible media outlet to do your math for you?
Posted on 6/27/13 at 2:52 pm to TooCold
Bye
Posted on 6/27/13 at 3:23 pm to LSUNV
Hello! 
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News