Started By
Message
re: Masoli denied...
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:07 am to DaleDenton
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:07 am to DaleDenton
1
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:11 am to DaleDenton
quote:
DaleDenton
Yeah, it's safer for you to play it that way than to discuss the recent information that has come to light.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:11 am to pankReb
He posted a picture making fun of George Bush...
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:12 am to hehatedrew
quote:
He posted a picture making fun of George Bush...
RAAAAAAGGGGEEEEEE.
......who hasn't?
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:22 am to OPR
quote:
Yeah, it's safer for you to play it that way than to discuss the recent information that has come to light.
The only new information you posted was that the NCAA responded in 1 day after Ole Miss turned in all the required material to be reviewed, so there goes the "they waited until so close to the start of the season" excuse.
Oh and you posted an opinion in the form of a tweet.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:24 am to DaleDenton
Then what about this?
quote:
Cooper sat out for a season and played in 15 games last season before being dismissed from the team by Tech head coach Kerry Rupp.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:35 am to pankReb
quote:
Then what about this?
quote:
In 2007, the membership overwhelmingly overrode a rule change that allowed all graduate student transfers to be eligible immediately if they met specific conditions. Instead, the membership supported a waiver process with third-party scrutiny to resolve cases that are academically motivated.
quote:
Media reports have portrayed several aspects of this case incorrectly. Current NCAA rules do not allow a football graduate student to participate at a school other than the one from which he earned his undergraduate degree without a waiver being granted. Contrary to recent media reports, the rules do not allow such a transfer to “sit out a year” and play the following academic year.
What about it?
These waivers are on a case-by-case review, just like some players have been able to transfer and receive a waiver to not have to sit out a year (B. Green) others who transfer for a similar reason may not be granted the waiver (R. Mallett).
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:35 am to DaleDenton
quote:
The only new information you posted was that the NCAA responded in 1 day after Ole Miss turned in all the required material to be reviewed, so there goes the "they waited until so close to the start of the season" excuse.
Oh and you posted an opinion in the form of a tweet.
Are... are you... wait a minute. Are you truly serious? Are you actually reading my post fully and coming up with the stuff you just typed? You've got to be fricking with me right? I mean, that's not the limit of your reading comprehension skills, is it? It can't be. Please God almighty damn tell me that you're just fricking around, and you really do understand the information in my post.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:37 am to DaleDenton
quote:
What about it?
These waivers are on a case-by-case review, just like some players have been able to transfer and receive a waiver to not have to sit out a year (B. Green) others who transfer for a similar reason may not be granted the waiver (R. Mallett).
So you just completely skirted around the example that I gave you.
And how exactly is Mallett's transfer relevant when discussing post-grad transfers?
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:50 am to pankReb
quote:
And how exactly is Mallett's transfer relevant when discussing post-grad transfers?
Because the post-grads now follow a similar to process to under-grads compared to the prior system that was changed after Urban Myer had a kid or two follow him to Florida from Utah.
quote:
In 2007, the membership overwhelmingly overrode a rule change that allowed all graduate student transfers to be eligible immediately if they met specific conditions. Instead, the membership supported a waiver process with third-party scrutiny to resolve cases that are academically motivated.
It is no longer "if you do this and that" then you are eligible. It is now ruled on a case-by-case basis.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:54 am to DaleDenton
quote:
It is now ruled on a case-by-case basis.
This is the part they are having trouble with.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:54 am to DaleDenton
quote:
In 2007, the membership overwhelmingly overrode a rule change that allowed all graduate student transfers to be eligible immediately if they met specific conditions. Instead, the membership supported a waiver process with third-party scrutiny to resolve cases that are academically motivated.
It is no longer "if you do this and that" then you are eligible. It is now ruled on a case-by-case basis.
You continue to show us that you only comprehend what helps your argument.
Did you not see that my example happened last year?
For the Arky alumnus manning register 12 at Wal Mart.....that's two years after the stated 2007 change.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:56 am to Cdawg
The Nuttster was just on local radio and said that up until Tuesday, Stanley was getting 40% of the snaps, Mackey 35% & Masoli 25%. Not sure if I buy that.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:56 am to Cdawg
quote:
This is the part they are having trouble with.
You are right. We are having trouble with this "case by case basis" when their reasoning for not clearing him evidently wasn't a problem with other cases.
They overruled their precedent set because this is a high-profile case.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:57 am to pankReb
quote:
You continue to show us that you only comprehend what helps your argument.
Did you not see that my example happened last year?
I see the result, but you are going to have to provide the details of each so I can form a better opinion.
I know more about the Masoli situation with overall thuggery, but there is no mention why the kid was dismissed from LaTech's team...
Posted on 9/2/10 at 10:59 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
The Nuttster was just on local radio and said that up until Tuesday, Stanley was getting 40% of the snaps, Mackey 35% & Masoli 25%. Not sure if I buy that.
I can vouch for that. Stanley has been getting the majority of the snaps this fall.
quote:
Stanley finished 10-of-11 for 117 yards and also had a 20-yard touchdown run. Masoli was 5-of-10 for 124 yards and threw two touchdown passes.
and Masoli had more snaps that scrimmage than most other fall practices as well as the previous scrimmage. I know that doesn't show the snaps in running plays, but it gives you a good sample size.
Posted on 9/2/10 at 11:00 am to RebFeBrees
What a fricking dumbshit. How exactly could I be butthurt?
I guess you're dreaming of better days. Stupid runt
I guess you're dreaming of better days. Stupid runt
Posted on 9/2/10 at 11:01 am to DaleDenton
quote:
I see the result, but you are going to have to provide the details of each so I can form a better opinion.
details.
rule overturned- 2007.
my example - 2009.
NCAA stated its reasoning for not clearing Masoli- was kicked off his team
Kid from LaTech- was kicked off his team.
precedent set-2009
Posted on 9/2/10 at 11:04 am to OPR
quote:
The only new information you posted was that the NCAA responded in 1 day after Ole Miss turned in all the required material to be reviewed, so there goes the "they waited until so close to the start of the season" excuse.
So are you saying this isnt true?
Posted on 9/2/10 at 11:04 am to Jaydeaux
quote:
Jaydeaux
hey pal, where do people watch da games in the kingdom of Mandeville? I'll be visiting the parents Vandy weekend.
Page 28 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News